Too vulnerable? Successful practices for conducting research with children and young people who have life-limiting or life-threatening illness.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-06 DOI:10.1177/02692163251362046
Eve Namisango, Marie Friedel, Sema Yurduşen, Waleed Alrjoub, Debbie Braybrook, Ghadeer Alarjeh, Anna Roach, Sabah Boufkhed, Bobbie Farsides, Lucy Coombes, Richard Harding
{"title":"Too vulnerable? Successful practices for conducting research with children and young people who have life-limiting or life-threatening illness.","authors":"Eve Namisango, Marie Friedel, Sema Yurduşen, Waleed Alrjoub, Debbie Braybrook, Ghadeer Alarjeh, Anna Roach, Sabah Boufkhed, Bobbie Farsides, Lucy Coombes, Richard Harding","doi":"10.1177/02692163251362046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A dearth of evidence exists on how to include children and young people in palliative care research.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to identify successful practices in involvement, recruitment and data collection with children and young people with life-limiting illness in research.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We synthesised methods from five primary studies from three geographical regions in which children with life-limiting conditions were recruited and interviewed. Using Expert Elicitation Methodology we identified successful practices in the three areas of involvement, recruitment and data collection. We established consensus on methodological challenges and solutions, and developed 10 recommendations for inclusion in research protocols.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Primary cross-national research in three regions; Middle East (one study), sub-Saharan Africa (one study), Europe (three studies), reporting on studies that recruited <i>N</i> = 244 children aged 5-18 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recommendations are: (1) research team supported by advisory group of children for entire research process; (2) appropriate distress protocol tailored to population; (3) opt not to use term 'palliative care' in study materials if significant distress is a risk; (4) be deliberate in purposive sampling to ensure diagnoses heterogeneity where appropriate; (5) age-appropriate information materials pre-tested by children; (6) clinical teams receive training in recruitment; (7) time to build rapport before starting data collection; (8) consider potential biases and advantages of having parent/carer present during interview; (9) use age-appropriate toys/games during interviews; (10) selfcare for researchers to manage distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These recommendations can guide design and conduct of research, enabling children with life-limiting illness to meaningfully participate and express their views.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1021-1029"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163251362046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A dearth of evidence exists on how to include children and young people in palliative care research.

Aim: We aimed to identify successful practices in involvement, recruitment and data collection with children and young people with life-limiting illness in research.

Design: We synthesised methods from five primary studies from three geographical regions in which children with life-limiting conditions were recruited and interviewed. Using Expert Elicitation Methodology we identified successful practices in the three areas of involvement, recruitment and data collection. We established consensus on methodological challenges and solutions, and developed 10 recommendations for inclusion in research protocols.

Setting: Primary cross-national research in three regions; Middle East (one study), sub-Saharan Africa (one study), Europe (three studies), reporting on studies that recruited N = 244 children aged 5-18 years.

Results: Recommendations are: (1) research team supported by advisory group of children for entire research process; (2) appropriate distress protocol tailored to population; (3) opt not to use term 'palliative care' in study materials if significant distress is a risk; (4) be deliberate in purposive sampling to ensure diagnoses heterogeneity where appropriate; (5) age-appropriate information materials pre-tested by children; (6) clinical teams receive training in recruitment; (7) time to build rapport before starting data collection; (8) consider potential biases and advantages of having parent/carer present during interview; (9) use age-appropriate toys/games during interviews; (10) selfcare for researchers to manage distress.

Conclusions: These recommendations can guide design and conduct of research, enabling children with life-limiting illness to meaningfully participate and express their views.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

太脆弱?对患有限制生命或威胁生命疾病的儿童和青少年进行研究的成功做法。
背景:关于如何将儿童和年轻人纳入姑息治疗研究的证据缺乏。目的:我们旨在确定研究中患有限制生命疾病的儿童和青少年的参与、招募和数据收集方面的成功实践。设计:我们综合了来自三个地理区域的五项主要研究的方法,这些研究招募并采访了生命受限的儿童。使用专家启发方法,我们确定了参与、招聘和数据收集三个领域的成功实践。我们就方法学上的挑战和解决方案达成了共识,并提出了10项纳入研究方案的建议。背景:三个地区的初步跨国研究;中东(一项研究),撒哈拉以南非洲(一项研究),欧洲(三项研究),报告了招募N = 244名5-18岁儿童的研究。结果:建议:(1)在整个研究过程中由儿童咨询小组支持的研究团队;(2)有针对性的救助方案;(3)如果存在重大痛苦风险,选择不在研究材料中使用“姑息治疗”一词;(4)在适当的情况下,审慎地进行有目的的抽样,以确保诊断出异质性;(五)儿童预先测试的适龄信息材料;(6)临床团队接受招聘培训;(7)开始数据收集前建立融洽关系的时间;(8)考虑有父母/照顾者在场的潜在偏见和优势;(9)在采访时使用适合年龄的玩具/游戏;(10)研究人员自我护理以管理痛苦。结论:这些建议可以指导研究的设计和开展,使患有限制生命疾病的儿童能够有意义地参与并表达他们的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信