Centering Community Voices: Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement in Pediatric Palliative Care Research.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Camille R Murray, Elizabeth Reisinger Walker, Maura Savage, Khaliah Johnson
{"title":"Centering Community Voices: Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement in Pediatric Palliative Care Research.","authors":"Camille R Murray, Elizabeth Reisinger Walker, Maura Savage, Khaliah Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Black and Native American children in the United States experience disparities in serious illness care and outcomes which are compounded by systemic inequities. These disparities necessitate research approaches that center the voices of racially minoritized families, combat systems of oppression, and promote culturally humble care. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) emphasizes engaging affected communities throughout the research process.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this evaluation, we assessed the engagement of a stakeholder advisory board (SAB) convened to guide a study about racism in pediatric serious illness care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a mixed method combined process and outcome evaluation to explore SAB members' perceptions of meaningful participation in meetings and agency in influencing the project's direction. Themes from observation data, Zoom chat logs, and post-meeting surveys were synthesized using triangulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes emerged: consistent and active engagement, building connection through empathy and humor, and shared purpose and personal commitment. These findings suggest that members' relationships with each other and sense of purpose fueled sustained engagement. Real-time response to improvement suggestions by SAB members fostered trust with the research team and promoted members' understanding of their capacity within the project.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SAB facilitated meaningful contributions toward the larger project from members and provided an emotionally supportive environment where participants could process shared experiences of racism in healthcare. The findings demonstrate the alignment between CBPR and values of palliative care and the value of iterative evaluation in community-engaged pediatric serious illness health equity research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.08.041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Black and Native American children in the United States experience disparities in serious illness care and outcomes which are compounded by systemic inequities. These disparities necessitate research approaches that center the voices of racially minoritized families, combat systems of oppression, and promote culturally humble care. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) emphasizes engaging affected communities throughout the research process.

Objectives: In this evaluation, we assessed the engagement of a stakeholder advisory board (SAB) convened to guide a study about racism in pediatric serious illness care.

Methods: We used a mixed method combined process and outcome evaluation to explore SAB members' perceptions of meaningful participation in meetings and agency in influencing the project's direction. Themes from observation data, Zoom chat logs, and post-meeting surveys were synthesized using triangulation.

Results: Three themes emerged: consistent and active engagement, building connection through empathy and humor, and shared purpose and personal commitment. These findings suggest that members' relationships with each other and sense of purpose fueled sustained engagement. Real-time response to improvement suggestions by SAB members fostered trust with the research team and promoted members' understanding of their capacity within the project.

Conclusion: The SAB facilitated meaningful contributions toward the larger project from members and provided an emotionally supportive environment where participants could process shared experiences of racism in healthcare. The findings demonstrate the alignment between CBPR and values of palliative care and the value of iterative evaluation in community-engaged pediatric serious illness health equity research.

以社区声音为中心:评估儿童姑息治疗研究中的利益相关者参与。
简介:美国黑人和印第安儿童在严重疾病护理和结果方面存在差异,这种差异因系统性不平等而加剧。这些差异需要以少数族裔家庭的声音为中心的研究方法,与压迫制度作斗争,并促进文化上的谦逊关怀。基于社区的参与性研究强调在整个研究过程中让受影响社区参与进来。在本次评估中,我们评估了利益相关者咨询委员会(SAB)的参与情况,该委员会旨在指导一项关于儿科重症护理中的种族主义的研究。方法:我们使用过程和结果评估相结合的混合方法来探索SAB成员对有意义参与会议和影响项目方向的机构的看法。观察数据、Zoom聊天记录和会后调查的主题使用三角测量法进行综合。结果:出现了三个主题:持续和积极的参与,通过同理心和幽默建立联系,共同的目标和个人承诺。这些发现表明,成员之间的关系和目标感推动了持续的参与。对SAB成员提出的改进建议的实时响应促进了与研究团队的信任,并促进了成员对他们在项目中的能力的理解。讨论:SAB促进了成员对更大项目的有意义的贡献,并提供了一个情感支持的环境,参与者可以处理医疗保健中种族主义的共同经历。研究结果表明,在社区参与的儿科大病健康公平研究中,CBPR与姑息治疗的价值以及迭代评估的价值之间存在一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信