{"title":"Association of Age-Friendly Hospital Care and Patient Outcomes for Older Adults.","authors":"Kathleen Drago, Bryanna De Lima","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitalized older adults are at greater risk for hospital-acquired complications than their younger counterparts. The Age-Friendly Health Systems 4Ms care delivery framework-What Matters, Mentation, Mobility, and Medication-provides evidence-based practices to improve care for older adults. This study assessed if 4Ms care in the hospital was associated with better patient outcomes and lower costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors retrospectively analyzed adults aged 65 years and older hospitalized at an academic hospital from September 2020 through December 2023 based on age-friendly status. Primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), total charges, and 30-day hospital and emergency department (ED) readmissions. Linear regression models were used for LOS and total charges. Survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models analyzed the 30-day hospital and ED readmissions. All models used propensity score matching to minimize confounding. Subgroup analyses were based on high and low case mix index (CMI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 20,202 admissions for patients aged 65 years and older. The hospitalized older adults receiving 4Ms care had 15.5% lower hospital charges (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.02-17.92), 5.2% shorter stays (95% CI 2.91-7.37), and had a 10.4% lower rate of hospital and ED readmissions (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.95) than those not receiving 4Ms care. The 4Ms recipients with a higher CMI had lower charges, shorter lengths of stay, and a lower risk of readmission than recipients with a lower CMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 4Ms care delivery framework was associated with reduced inpatient utilization and overall cost of care. These results support reliable delivery of the 4Ms to benefit older hospitalized adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2025.07.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hospitalized older adults are at greater risk for hospital-acquired complications than their younger counterparts. The Age-Friendly Health Systems 4Ms care delivery framework-What Matters, Mentation, Mobility, and Medication-provides evidence-based practices to improve care for older adults. This study assessed if 4Ms care in the hospital was associated with better patient outcomes and lower costs.
Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed adults aged 65 years and older hospitalized at an academic hospital from September 2020 through December 2023 based on age-friendly status. Primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), total charges, and 30-day hospital and emergency department (ED) readmissions. Linear regression models were used for LOS and total charges. Survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models analyzed the 30-day hospital and ED readmissions. All models used propensity score matching to minimize confounding. Subgroup analyses were based on high and low case mix index (CMI).
Results: The sample included 20,202 admissions for patients aged 65 years and older. The hospitalized older adults receiving 4Ms care had 15.5% lower hospital charges (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.02-17.92), 5.2% shorter stays (95% CI 2.91-7.37), and had a 10.4% lower rate of hospital and ED readmissions (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.95) than those not receiving 4Ms care. The 4Ms recipients with a higher CMI had lower charges, shorter lengths of stay, and a lower risk of readmission than recipients with a lower CMI.
Conclusion: The 4Ms care delivery framework was associated with reduced inpatient utilization and overall cost of care. These results support reliable delivery of the 4Ms to benefit older hospitalized adults.
背景:住院的老年人发生医院获得性并发症的风险高于年轻人。老年人友好型卫生系统4Ms护理提供框架——“重要的是什么”、“心理状态”、“行动能力”和“药物”——为改善老年人护理提供了循证实践。这项研究评估了在医院的4Ms护理是否与更好的患者预后和更低的成本有关。方法:作者回顾性分析了2020年9月至2023年12月在某学术医院住院的65岁及以上老年人。主要结局是住院时间(LOS)、总费用和30天医院和急诊部(ED)再入院。LOS和总收费采用线性回归模型。生存分析和Cox比例风险模型分析了30天住院和急诊室再入院情况。所有模型都使用倾向评分匹配来最小化混淆。亚组分析基于高、低病例混合指数(CMI)。结果:样本包括20,202例入院的65岁及以上患者。与未接受4Ms护理的老年人相比,接受4Ms护理的住院老年人住院费用降低15.5%(95%可信区间[CI] 13.02-17.92),住院时间缩短5.2% (95% CI 2.91-7.37),住院和急诊科再入院率降低10.4%(风险比0.90,95% CI 0.84-0.95)。与CMI较低的接受者相比,CMI较高的4Ms接受者的费用较低,住院时间较短,再入院风险较低。结论:4Ms护理交付框架与降低住院利用率和总体护理成本有关。这些结果支持4Ms的可靠输送,使住院的老年人受益。