Pain experience of people with inflammatory bowel disease: a qualitative study.

IF 2.9 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Charlotte Beames, Afra Azadi, Amanda C de C Williams
{"title":"Pain experience of people with inflammatory bowel disease: a qualitative study.","authors":"Charlotte Beames, Afra Azadi, Amanda C de C Williams","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly experience pain, whether during active disease or remission, which interferes with daily life and major goals and causes distress. Current psychological methods of pain management draw from musculoskeletal pain interventions, but it has not been established that the musculoskeletal model is a good fit. We aimed to outline a psychological model of IBD pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used qualitative methods: a very open interview (Grid Elaboration Method), conducted online and transcripts analysed for themes and subthemes. 15 men and 15 women with IBD pain, recruited from a national charity, took part in 4 months to February 2024. Participants scored their average pain 5/10 and interference by pain with activity 6/10, where 10 is maximum pain or interference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We extracted five inter-related themes: on the emotional impact of pain and symptoms; the challenge of pain; restrictions due to pain and other IBD symptoms; shortcomings in healthcare, particularly for pain; and poor public understanding of IBD. Although the first theme, universally endorsed, covered anxiety about the meaning of pain, we did not find the fears about physical integrity that characterise much musculoskeletal pain, nor the avoidance of physical activities based on those fears.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We propose that further exploration is warranted of the experience of IBD-related pain and how people adjust to it. This will inform the design of better psychologically-informed interventions to help people with IBD manage their pain, independently and in partnership with healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12414221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly experience pain, whether during active disease or remission, which interferes with daily life and major goals and causes distress. Current psychological methods of pain management draw from musculoskeletal pain interventions, but it has not been established that the musculoskeletal model is a good fit. We aimed to outline a psychological model of IBD pain.

Methods: We used qualitative methods: a very open interview (Grid Elaboration Method), conducted online and transcripts analysed for themes and subthemes. 15 men and 15 women with IBD pain, recruited from a national charity, took part in 4 months to February 2024. Participants scored their average pain 5/10 and interference by pain with activity 6/10, where 10 is maximum pain or interference.

Results: We extracted five inter-related themes: on the emotional impact of pain and symptoms; the challenge of pain; restrictions due to pain and other IBD symptoms; shortcomings in healthcare, particularly for pain; and poor public understanding of IBD. Although the first theme, universally endorsed, covered anxiety about the meaning of pain, we did not find the fears about physical integrity that characterise much musculoskeletal pain, nor the avoidance of physical activities based on those fears.

Conclusion: We propose that further exploration is warranted of the experience of IBD-related pain and how people adjust to it. This will inform the design of better psychologically-informed interventions to help people with IBD manage their pain, independently and in partnership with healthcare.

Abstract Image

炎症性肠病患者的疼痛体验:一项定性研究。
炎症性肠病(IBD)患者通常会经历疼痛,无论是在活动性疾病还是缓解期,这干扰了日常生活和主要目标,并导致痛苦。目前的疼痛管理的心理方法从肌肉骨骼疼痛干预,但它还没有建立,肌肉骨骼模型是一个很好的适合。我们旨在概述IBD疼痛的心理模型。方法:我们采用定性方法:非常开放的访谈(网格细化法),在线进行,并对主题和副主题进行分析。从一个国家慈善机构招募了15名患有IBD疼痛的男性和15名女性,参加了到2024年2月的4个月。参与者给他们的平均疼痛评分为5/10,对疼痛的干扰评分为6/10,其中10是最大的疼痛或干扰。结果:我们提取了五个相互关联的主题:对疼痛和症状的情绪影响;痛苦的挑战;疼痛和其他IBD症状引起的限制;医疗保健方面的缺陷,特别是疼痛方面的缺陷;公众对炎症性肠病的认识不足。尽管第一个主题得到了普遍认可,涵盖了对疼痛意义的焦虑,但我们没有发现肌肉骨骼疼痛所特有的对身体完整性的恐惧,也没有发现基于这些恐惧而避免体育活动。结论:我们建议进一步探索ibd相关疼痛的经历以及人们如何适应它是有必要的。这将为设计更好的心理知情干预措施提供信息,以帮助IBD患者独立地或与卫生保健部门合作管理他们的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信