Wenqin Xu , Abigail M. Keith , Wenjuan Ye , Xin Hu , Noel Southall , Juan J. Marugan , Marc Ferrer , Mark J. Henderson , Patrick M. Sexton , Giuseppe Deganutti , Lee E. Eiden
{"title":"Design of peptide-based PAC1 antagonists combining molecular dynamics simulations and a biologically relevant cell-based assay","authors":"Wenqin Xu , Abigail M. Keith , Wenjuan Ye , Xin Hu , Noel Southall , Juan J. Marugan , Marc Ferrer , Mark J. Henderson , Patrick M. Sexton , Giuseppe Deganutti , Lee E. Eiden","doi":"10.1016/j.bcp.2025.117300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The PACAP receptor PAC1 is a G<sub>s</sub>-coupled family B1 GPCR for which the highest-affinity endogenous peptide ligands are the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptides PACAP38 and PACAP27, and whose most abundant endogenous ligand is PACAP38. PACAP action at PAC1 is implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders, atherosclerosis, pain chronification, and protection from neurodegeneration and ischemia. As PACAP also interacts with two related receptors, VPAC1 and VPAC2, highly selective ligands, both agonists and antagonists, for PAC1 have been sought. To date, the peptide PACAP(6–38) and polypeptide M65, which is related to maxadilan, a sandfly vasodilator peptide, have been identified as selective for PAC1. Several non-peptide small molecule compounds (SMOLs) have been reported to be specific antagonists at PAC1, albeit there is only limited literature detailing their pharmacology across different systems and within different laboratories. Here, we present a platform of cellular assays for the screening of biologically relevant antagonists at PAC1 and show that some currently proposed SMOL antagonists do not have activity in this cell reporter assay, while we confirm that PACAP(6–38) and M65 are competitive antagonists. We have used this assay system to explore other peptide antagonists at PAC1, guided by molecular dynamics analysis of the PACAP-PAC1 interaction based on cryo-EM structural models of PAC1 complexed with a number of biologically active ligands. The affinity-trap model for the PAC1-ligand interaction successfully predicts the engagement behavior of PACAP27 and PACAP38 peptide-based PAC1 inhibitors. In particular, C-terminal deletants of PACAP(6–38) that maintain equipotency to PACAP(6–38) allow the shorter sequence to function as a scaffold for further peptide-based antagonist exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8806,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical pharmacology","volume":"242 ","pages":"Article 117300"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006295225005659","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The PACAP receptor PAC1 is a Gs-coupled family B1 GPCR for which the highest-affinity endogenous peptide ligands are the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptides PACAP38 and PACAP27, and whose most abundant endogenous ligand is PACAP38. PACAP action at PAC1 is implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders, atherosclerosis, pain chronification, and protection from neurodegeneration and ischemia. As PACAP also interacts with two related receptors, VPAC1 and VPAC2, highly selective ligands, both agonists and antagonists, for PAC1 have been sought. To date, the peptide PACAP(6–38) and polypeptide M65, which is related to maxadilan, a sandfly vasodilator peptide, have been identified as selective for PAC1. Several non-peptide small molecule compounds (SMOLs) have been reported to be specific antagonists at PAC1, albeit there is only limited literature detailing their pharmacology across different systems and within different laboratories. Here, we present a platform of cellular assays for the screening of biologically relevant antagonists at PAC1 and show that some currently proposed SMOL antagonists do not have activity in this cell reporter assay, while we confirm that PACAP(6–38) and M65 are competitive antagonists. We have used this assay system to explore other peptide antagonists at PAC1, guided by molecular dynamics analysis of the PACAP-PAC1 interaction based on cryo-EM structural models of PAC1 complexed with a number of biologically active ligands. The affinity-trap model for the PAC1-ligand interaction successfully predicts the engagement behavior of PACAP27 and PACAP38 peptide-based PAC1 inhibitors. In particular, C-terminal deletants of PACAP(6–38) that maintain equipotency to PACAP(6–38) allow the shorter sequence to function as a scaffold for further peptide-based antagonist exploration.
期刊介绍:
Biochemical Pharmacology publishes original research findings, Commentaries and review articles related to the elucidation of cellular and tissue function(s) at the biochemical and molecular levels, the modification of cellular phenotype(s) by genetic, transcriptional/translational or drug/compound-induced modifications, as well as the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of xenobiotics and drugs, the latter including both small molecules and biologics.
The journal''s target audience includes scientists engaged in the identification and study of the mechanisms of action of xenobiotics, biologics and drugs and in the drug discovery and development process.
All areas of cellular biology and cellular, tissue/organ and whole animal pharmacology fall within the scope of the journal. Drug classes covered include anti-infectives, anti-inflammatory agents, chemotherapeutics, cardiovascular, endocrinological, immunological, metabolic, neurological and psychiatric drugs, as well as research on drug metabolism and kinetics. While medicinal chemistry is a topic of complimentary interest, manuscripts in this area must contain sufficient biological data to characterize pharmacologically the compounds reported. Submissions describing work focused predominately on chemical synthesis and molecular modeling will not be considered for review.
While particular emphasis is placed on reporting the results of molecular and biochemical studies, research involving the use of tissue and animal models of human pathophysiology and toxicology is of interest to the extent that it helps define drug mechanisms of action, safety and efficacy.