Prepectoral Passot-Type Immediate Breast Reconstruction With the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Grades 2 and 3 Ptosis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Brittany Davis, Jessica Hale, Elaine Lelli, Mark A Brzezienski
{"title":"Prepectoral Passot-Type Immediate Breast Reconstruction With the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Grades 2 and 3 Ptosis.","authors":"Brittany Davis, Jessica Hale, Elaine Lelli, Mark A Brzezienski","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Implant-based breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy remains one of the most frequently used methods of breast reconstruction in the US. Patients with large, ptotic breasts often face poorer outcomes. We hypothesized that implant-based breast reconstruction with auto-augmentation techniques can minimize problems with acellular dermal matrices (ADM) by using less, and providing the benefit of prepectoral placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single institution retrospective review of all patients with grade 2 or 3 ptosis following subpectoral and prepectoral BR with autologous dermal tissue and/or ADM over a 5-year period. Outcomes, complications, and costs between the subpectoral, prepectoral, and tissue expander (TE) with ADM groups were compared within our sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women in the Passot-type reconstruction groups had significantly higher body mass indices and rates of radiation therapy. When body mass index and radiation were controlled for, there were no significant differences in complication rates between prepectoral Passot, subpectoral Passot, and the TE/ADM group. Passot-type reconstructions can be significantly less expensive than TE/ADM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prepectoral Passot-type reconstruction is a viable method to limit complications of subpectoral approaches at roughly half the cost of a TE/ADM approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"95 3S Suppl 1","pages":"S29-S36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Implant-based breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy remains one of the most frequently used methods of breast reconstruction in the US. Patients with large, ptotic breasts often face poorer outcomes. We hypothesized that implant-based breast reconstruction with auto-augmentation techniques can minimize problems with acellular dermal matrices (ADM) by using less, and providing the benefit of prepectoral placement.

Methods: We performed a single institution retrospective review of all patients with grade 2 or 3 ptosis following subpectoral and prepectoral BR with autologous dermal tissue and/or ADM over a 5-year period. Outcomes, complications, and costs between the subpectoral, prepectoral, and tissue expander (TE) with ADM groups were compared within our sample.

Results: Women in the Passot-type reconstruction groups had significantly higher body mass indices and rates of radiation therapy. When body mass index and radiation were controlled for, there were no significant differences in complication rates between prepectoral Passot, subpectoral Passot, and the TE/ADM group. Passot-type reconstructions can be significantly less expensive than TE/ADM.

Conclusions: Prepectoral Passot-type reconstruction is a viable method to limit complications of subpectoral approaches at roughly half the cost of a TE/ADM approach.

使用脱细胞真皮基质治疗2级和3级上睑下垂的乳前passot型即刻乳房重建。
在美国,保留皮肤的乳房切除术后植体乳房重建仍然是最常用的乳房重建方法之一。乳房大、下垂的患者往往面临较差的结果。我们假设采用自体隆胸技术的基于假体的乳房重建可以通过较少的使用减少脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)的问题,并提供乳房前放置的好处。方法:我们对所有胸下和胸前BR合并自体真皮组织和/或ADM的2级或3级上睑下垂患者进行了一项为期5年的单机构回顾性研究。在我们的样本中比较胸下组、胸前组和组织扩张器组(TE)与ADM组的结局、并发症和成本。结果:passot型重建组女性的体重指数和放射治疗率明显高于对照组。在控制体重指数和辐射的情况下,胸前Passot组、胸下Passot组和TE/ADM组的并发症发生率无显著差异。passot型重建比TE/ADM便宜得多。结论:胸前passot型重建是一种可行的方法,可以限制胸下入路的并发症,其成本约为TE/ADM入路的一半。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信