Infrared Thermography for Early Detection of Vascular Compromise in Microvascular and Pedicled Flap Reconstruction.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Siddharth Mayakuntla, Joseph Thomas, Harshavardhan Shetty, Neha Mookim, Carlsen Pereira, Tanvi Rao
{"title":"Infrared Thermography for Early Detection of Vascular Compromise in Microvascular and Pedicled Flap Reconstruction.","authors":"Siddharth Mayakuntla, Joseph Thomas, Harshavardhan Shetty, Neha Mookim, Carlsen Pereira, Tanvi Rao","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection of vascular compromise is pivotal for successful microvascular flap reconstruction, as tissue necrosis can begin within 6 to 8 hours of circulatory impairment. Although conventional monitoring relies on subjective clinical assessment of color, temperature, and capillary refill-methods with inherent observer variability and diminished utility in patients with darker skin tones-emerging technologies offer potential for more objective evaluation. This study compared the efficacy of infrared thermography (IRT), a noninvasive modality that quantifies perfusion through precise temperature mapping, with traditional clinical methods for postoperative flap monitoring. Given that the critical salvage window is time-limited, with intervention, success rates declining precipitously after 8 hours of ischemia, establishing monitoring protocols with enhanced sensitivity and earlier detection capabilities could significantly improve free flap survival rates and reduce revision surgeries. The efficacy of IRT with conventional clinical methods is compared for post-operative flap monitoring for free and pedicled flaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study enrolled 40 patients undergoing flap reconstruction between August 2023 and October 2024. Post-operative monitoring included IRT using a forward-looking infrared camera and conventional clinical assessments at standardized intervals. Detection time, sensitivity, specificity, and flap salvage rates were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine of 40 flaps (22.5%) developed vascular compromise. IRT detected complications significantly earlier than clinical methods (34.8 vs 38.8 hours, P = 0.02). IRT demonstrated superior sensitivity (96%) and specificity (89%) compared with clinical assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IRT enables earlier detection of vascular compromise compared with conventional clinical methods, potentially improving flap salvage rates. Integration of IRT into standard monitoring protocols may enhance patient outcomes following microvascular and pedicled flap reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"95 3S Suppl 1","pages":"S49-S54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early detection of vascular compromise is pivotal for successful microvascular flap reconstruction, as tissue necrosis can begin within 6 to 8 hours of circulatory impairment. Although conventional monitoring relies on subjective clinical assessment of color, temperature, and capillary refill-methods with inherent observer variability and diminished utility in patients with darker skin tones-emerging technologies offer potential for more objective evaluation. This study compared the efficacy of infrared thermography (IRT), a noninvasive modality that quantifies perfusion through precise temperature mapping, with traditional clinical methods for postoperative flap monitoring. Given that the critical salvage window is time-limited, with intervention, success rates declining precipitously after 8 hours of ischemia, establishing monitoring protocols with enhanced sensitivity and earlier detection capabilities could significantly improve free flap survival rates and reduce revision surgeries. The efficacy of IRT with conventional clinical methods is compared for post-operative flap monitoring for free and pedicled flaps.

Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 40 patients undergoing flap reconstruction between August 2023 and October 2024. Post-operative monitoring included IRT using a forward-looking infrared camera and conventional clinical assessments at standardized intervals. Detection time, sensitivity, specificity, and flap salvage rates were analyzed.

Results: Nine of 40 flaps (22.5%) developed vascular compromise. IRT detected complications significantly earlier than clinical methods (34.8 vs 38.8 hours, P = 0.02). IRT demonstrated superior sensitivity (96%) and specificity (89%) compared with clinical assessment.

Conclusion: IRT enables earlier detection of vascular compromise compared with conventional clinical methods, potentially improving flap salvage rates. Integration of IRT into standard monitoring protocols may enhance patient outcomes following microvascular and pedicled flap reconstruction.

红外热成像在微血管及带蒂皮瓣重建中血管损伤的早期检测。
背景:早期发现血管损伤是微血管皮瓣重建成功的关键,因为组织坏死可在循环损伤后6至8小时内开始。尽管传统的监测依赖于主观的临床评估颜色、温度和毛细血管充血——这些方法具有固有的观察者可变性,并且在肤色较深的患者中实用性降低——新兴技术提供了更客观评估的潜力。本研究比较了红外热像仪(IRT)与传统临床术后皮瓣监测方法的疗效。红外热像仪是一种无创的方式,通过精确的温度测绘来量化灌注。鉴于关键抢救窗口是有时间限制的,在干预下,缺血8小时后成功率急剧下降,建立具有增强敏感性和早期检测能力的监测方案可以显著提高游离皮瓣存活率,减少翻修手术。比较了IRT与常规临床方法在游离皮瓣和带蒂皮瓣术后监测中的效果。方法:这项前瞻性观察研究纳入了2023年8月至2024年10月期间接受皮瓣重建的40例患者。术后监测包括使用前视红外相机进行IRT,并按标准时间间隔进行常规临床评估。分析检测时间、敏感性、特异性和皮瓣保留率。结果:40个皮瓣中9个(22.5%)发生血管损伤。IRT检测并发症的时间明显早于临床方法(34.8 h vs 38.8 h, P = 0.02)。与临床评估相比,IRT表现出更高的敏感性(96%)和特异性(89%)。结论:与常规临床方法相比,IRT能够更早地发现血管损伤,潜在地提高皮瓣保留率。将IRT整合到标准监测方案中可以提高微血管和带蒂皮瓣重建后的患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信