{"title":"Interpretable Machine Learning Approaches for Identification Acute Aortic Dissection in Chest Pain Patients.","authors":"Shuangshuang Li, Kaiwen Zhao, Wen Li, Qingsheng Lu, Jian Zhou, Jia He","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is using interpretable machine learning methods to construct models by combing routine laboratory examination biomarkers and clinical characteristics to identify acute aortic dissection (AAD) patients from other sudden chest pain patients referring to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute pulmonary embolism (APE) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research encompassed a cohort of 832 individuals, with 515 of them diagnosed as acute aortic dissection patients. Patients were randomly assigned to training and test groups for model development and evaluation, with data collected from medical records and validated by study physicians. LASSO regression was used for variable selection in the study, which utilized nine machine learning algorithms for model development. The DeLong test compared AUC values among models. Optimal parameters were found through grid search on the training set with 5-fold cross validation. The SHAP method ranks input feature importance and explains model outcomes to address model opacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Utilizing the LASSO regression technique, eight variables were pinpointed for their nonlinear significance. Evaluation of these models using test set data yielded area under the curve (AUC) values between 0.72 and 0.77, suggesting promising utility in differential diagnosis. The Random Forest method demonstrated noteworthy sensitivity, specificity, and F1 Score. The internal validation set consistently yielded results with an area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.71 to 0.77. The SHAP method was utilized to assess the influence of features on the model, identifying N.L and age as the most significant variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this prognostic study, a machine learning model was created to assist in differentiating patients with aortic dissection from those presenting with chest pain. The use of interpretable machine learning techniques allows for the prioritization of key features, showcasing significant potential for application in supporting the prompt diagnosis and treatment of aortic dissection differentials.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.08.028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is using interpretable machine learning methods to construct models by combing routine laboratory examination biomarkers and clinical characteristics to identify acute aortic dissection (AAD) patients from other sudden chest pain patients referring to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute pulmonary embolism (APE) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).
Methods: The research encompassed a cohort of 832 individuals, with 515 of them diagnosed as acute aortic dissection patients. Patients were randomly assigned to training and test groups for model development and evaluation, with data collected from medical records and validated by study physicians. LASSO regression was used for variable selection in the study, which utilized nine machine learning algorithms for model development. The DeLong test compared AUC values among models. Optimal parameters were found through grid search on the training set with 5-fold cross validation. The SHAP method ranks input feature importance and explains model outcomes to address model opacity.
Results: Utilizing the LASSO regression technique, eight variables were pinpointed for their nonlinear significance. Evaluation of these models using test set data yielded area under the curve (AUC) values between 0.72 and 0.77, suggesting promising utility in differential diagnosis. The Random Forest method demonstrated noteworthy sensitivity, specificity, and F1 Score. The internal validation set consistently yielded results with an area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.71 to 0.77. The SHAP method was utilized to assess the influence of features on the model, identifying N.L and age as the most significant variables.
Conclusion: In this prognostic study, a machine learning model was created to assist in differentiating patients with aortic dissection from those presenting with chest pain. The use of interpretable machine learning techniques allows for the prioritization of key features, showcasing significant potential for application in supporting the prompt diagnosis and treatment of aortic dissection differentials.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal:
Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials)
Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work)
Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients)
General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic)
Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery
Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers)
Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery)
Editorials/Correspondence