Analysis of Ansätze Expressibility and Complexity and Their Impact on Classification Accuracy Using QNN and QLSTM

IF 3.6 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Sarvapriya M. Tripathi;Himanshu Upadhyay;Jayesh Soni
{"title":"Analysis of Ansätze Expressibility and Complexity and Their Impact on Classification Accuracy Using QNN and QLSTM","authors":"Sarvapriya M. Tripathi;Himanshu Upadhyay;Jayesh Soni","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3604721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) and Quantum Long Short-Term Memory (QLSTM) models are emerging as powerful tools in quantum machine learning. The effectiveness of these models is largely governed by the structure of their parameterized quantum circuits, also known as Ansätze. The Expressibility (measure of how well an ansätz can explore Hilbert space), Entanglement (which governs the correlation between states of multiple qubits), and Depth (a measure of how many layers of quantum gates a circuit has) are fundamental to a model’s capacity to learn complex patterns. In this paper, we analyze how varying these attributes for various ansätze influences classification cost and accuracy. We evaluated QNN and QLSTM models across three cybersecurity datasets using ten ansätze with varying expressibility and complexity. Results showed that ansätze with lower expressibility and complexity achieved accuracy and training stability comparable to the more complex ones. Additionally, we found that QNN models consistently offered a better trade-off between accuracy, training time, and computational efficiency compared to QLSTM models.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"152412-152429"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11145787","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11145787/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) and Quantum Long Short-Term Memory (QLSTM) models are emerging as powerful tools in quantum machine learning. The effectiveness of these models is largely governed by the structure of their parameterized quantum circuits, also known as Ansätze. The Expressibility (measure of how well an ansätz can explore Hilbert space), Entanglement (which governs the correlation between states of multiple qubits), and Depth (a measure of how many layers of quantum gates a circuit has) are fundamental to a model’s capacity to learn complex patterns. In this paper, we analyze how varying these attributes for various ansätze influences classification cost and accuracy. We evaluated QNN and QLSTM models across three cybersecurity datasets using ten ansätze with varying expressibility and complexity. Results showed that ansätze with lower expressibility and complexity achieved accuracy and training stability comparable to the more complex ones. Additionally, we found that QNN models consistently offered a better trade-off between accuracy, training time, and computational efficiency compared to QLSTM models.
利用QNN和QLSTM分析Ansätze可表达性和复杂性及其对分类精度的影响
量子神经网络(QNN)和量子长短期记忆(QLSTM)模型正在成为量子机器学习的强大工具。这些模型的有效性很大程度上取决于它们的参数化量子电路的结构,也称为Ansätze。可表达性(衡量ansätz探索希尔伯特空间的能力)、纠缠性(控制多个量子比特状态之间的相关性)和深度(衡量一个电路有多少层量子门)是模型学习复杂模式能力的基础。在本文中,我们分析了不同ansätze属性的变化对分类成本和准确率的影响。我们使用十个具有不同可表达性和复杂性的ansätze在三个网络安全数据集上评估QNN和QLSTM模型。结果表明,可表达性和复杂性较低的ansätze与较复杂的ansätze相比,准确率和训练稳定性相当。此外,我们发现与QLSTM模型相比,QNN模型始终在准确性、训练时间和计算效率之间提供更好的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信