“The Best of Both Worlds” a content analysis of midwives’ perspectives on using ultrasound for labour progress assessment

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Elsa Ruth Gylfadóttir , Hulda Hjartardóttir , Valgerður Lísa Sigurðardóttir
{"title":"“The Best of Both Worlds” a content analysis of midwives’ perspectives on using ultrasound for labour progress assessment","authors":"Elsa Ruth Gylfadóttir ,&nbsp;Hulda Hjartardóttir ,&nbsp;Valgerður Lísa Sigurðardóttir","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2025.101142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Midwives in labour wards at high-tech hospitals have witnessed significant technological advancements. Ultrasound devices for assessing labour progress may offer advantages over traditional vaginal examinations. However, it is important to examine the views of care providers before introducing this new technology.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The aim is to examine the views of midwives working in a hospital labour ward regarding the use of ultrasound devices in assessing the progress of labour and explore their views of implementing such a technology to improve care for women during labour.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A qualitative study was conducted, using three semi structured focus groups interviews with 16 midwives from the hospital labour ward. A purposive sample was used to capture diverse backgrounds and experiences. Content analysis was used to identify key categories and subcategories.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two main categories emerged: 1) “Art of midwifery and technology,” including a debate between clinical skills and technology, midwives’ openness to learning, and their desire to control implementation; 2) “Women and babies come first,” highlighting the importance of options, safety, and the connection with the woman.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Midwives support evidence-based technological advancements that benefit clients without increasing unnecessary interventions. They believe ultrasound complements traditional vaginal exams and is a valuable option for certain groups of women. Midwives need to be involved in the implementation of new methods to ensure client well-being. Further research is needed to evaluate the benefits of using ultrasound for labour progress assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 101142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575625000801","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Midwives in labour wards at high-tech hospitals have witnessed significant technological advancements. Ultrasound devices for assessing labour progress may offer advantages over traditional vaginal examinations. However, it is important to examine the views of care providers before introducing this new technology.

Aim

The aim is to examine the views of midwives working in a hospital labour ward regarding the use of ultrasound devices in assessing the progress of labour and explore their views of implementing such a technology to improve care for women during labour.

Method

A qualitative study was conducted, using three semi structured focus groups interviews with 16 midwives from the hospital labour ward. A purposive sample was used to capture diverse backgrounds and experiences. Content analysis was used to identify key categories and subcategories.

Results

Two main categories emerged: 1) “Art of midwifery and technology,” including a debate between clinical skills and technology, midwives’ openness to learning, and their desire to control implementation; 2) “Women and babies come first,” highlighting the importance of options, safety, and the connection with the woman.

Conclusion

Midwives support evidence-based technological advancements that benefit clients without increasing unnecessary interventions. They believe ultrasound complements traditional vaginal exams and is a valuable option for certain groups of women. Midwives need to be involved in the implementation of new methods to ensure client well-being. Further research is needed to evaluate the benefits of using ultrasound for labour progress assessment.
“两全其美”内容分析助产士对使用超声波进行产程评估的观点
高科技医院产房的助产士见证了重大的技术进步。用于评估产程的超声设备可能比传统的阴道检查更有优势。然而,在引入这项新技术之前,检查护理提供者的观点是很重要的。目的调查医院产房助产士对使用超声波设备评估分娩进展的看法,并探讨她们对采用这种技术以改善产妇分娩护理的看法。方法采用三个半结构化的焦点小组访谈,对医院产房的16名助产士进行定性研究。一个有目的的样本被用来捕捉不同的背景和经历。内容分析用于确定关键类别和子类别。结果出现了两个主要类别:1)“助产艺术与技术”,包括临床技能与技术之间的辩论,助产士对学习的开放程度,以及他们控制实施的愿望;2)“女人和孩子是第一位的”,强调选择、安全以及与女人联系的重要性。结论助产士支持基于证据的技术进步,在不增加不必要干预的情况下使客户受益。他们认为超声波是传统阴道检查的补充,对某些女性群体来说是一个有价值的选择。助产士需要参与新方法的实施,以确保客户的福祉。需要进一步的研究来评估使用超声进行产程评估的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
73
审稿时长
45 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信