Beyond native plants: Aligning greening programs with disadvantaged communities’ landscape needs for more equitable green infrastructure planning

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Adriana A. Zuniga-Teran , Kenneth J. Kokroko , Lucero M. Radonic , Meredith E. Hovis , Adrienne R. Brown , Ivan E. Gaxiola , Flor Sandoval , Molli Bryson , Christian Aguilar-Murrieta , Oscar A. Rodriguez-Ponce , Blue Baldwin , Neha Gupta , Luz Imelda Cortez , Greg A. Barron-Gafford
{"title":"Beyond native plants: Aligning greening programs with disadvantaged communities’ landscape needs for more equitable green infrastructure planning","authors":"Adriana A. Zuniga-Teran ,&nbsp;Kenneth J. Kokroko ,&nbsp;Lucero M. Radonic ,&nbsp;Meredith E. Hovis ,&nbsp;Adrienne R. Brown ,&nbsp;Ivan E. Gaxiola ,&nbsp;Flor Sandoval ,&nbsp;Molli Bryson ,&nbsp;Christian Aguilar-Murrieta ,&nbsp;Oscar A. Rodriguez-Ponce ,&nbsp;Blue Baldwin ,&nbsp;Neha Gupta ,&nbsp;Luz Imelda Cortez ,&nbsp;Greg A. Barron-Gafford","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cities worldwide are turning to greening programs to adapt to climate change and increase urban resilience. These programs are particularly needed in disadvantaged neighborhoods, typically less vegetated and more vulnerable to severe heat and flooding.<!--> <!-->Drawing from environmental justice scholarship, we argue that<!--> <!-->it is necessary to recognize minority viewpoints and perspectives in green infrastructure planning and align greening programs accordingly to<!--> <!-->effectively reach disadvantaged communities. This study fills this gap by<!--> <!-->examining the alignment of greening programs with the viewpoints and perspectives of disadvantaged communities in Tucson, Arizona, a city leader in greening policies, albeit with inequities in the adoption of such policies and in greenspace distribution. We engaged low-income, predominantly Hispanic communities to identify residential plant preferences and understand the reasons for plant selection. Findings reveal a misalignment between the main drivers of greening programs and those of disadvantaged communities. To advance justice in green infrastructure planning in desert cities, we call for adopting a multifunctional approach to greening that recognizes the benefits and values<!--> <!-->sought by disadvantaged communities, acknowledges water as the key equity resource, and supports local leaders, engagement efforts, and partnerships.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104393"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cities worldwide are turning to greening programs to adapt to climate change and increase urban resilience. These programs are particularly needed in disadvantaged neighborhoods, typically less vegetated and more vulnerable to severe heat and flooding. Drawing from environmental justice scholarship, we argue that it is necessary to recognize minority viewpoints and perspectives in green infrastructure planning and align greening programs accordingly to effectively reach disadvantaged communities. This study fills this gap by examining the alignment of greening programs with the viewpoints and perspectives of disadvantaged communities in Tucson, Arizona, a city leader in greening policies, albeit with inequities in the adoption of such policies and in greenspace distribution. We engaged low-income, predominantly Hispanic communities to identify residential plant preferences and understand the reasons for plant selection. Findings reveal a misalignment between the main drivers of greening programs and those of disadvantaged communities. To advance justice in green infrastructure planning in desert cities, we call for adopting a multifunctional approach to greening that recognizes the benefits and values sought by disadvantaged communities, acknowledges water as the key equity resource, and supports local leaders, engagement efforts, and partnerships.
超越原生植物:将绿化项目与弱势社区的景观需求相结合,以实现更公平的绿色基础设施规划
世界各地的城市都在转向绿化项目,以适应气候变化,增强城市韧性。弱势社区尤其需要这些项目,这些社区通常植被较少,更容易受到高温和洪水的影响。根据环境正义研究,我们认为有必要在绿色基础设施规划中认识到少数人的观点和观点,并相应地调整绿化计划,以有效地覆盖弱势社区。这项研究填补了这一空白,通过检查绿化项目与亚利桑那州图森市弱势社区的观点和观点的一致性,图森市是绿化政策的领导者,尽管在采用这些政策和绿色空间分布方面存在不平等。我们与以西班牙裔为主的低收入社区合作,以确定住宅植物偏好并了解植物选择的原因。研究结果揭示了绿化项目的主要驱动因素与弱势社区的驱动因素之间的不一致。为了促进沙漠城市绿色基础设施规划的公平性,我们呼吁采用多功能绿化方法,认识到弱势社区所追求的利益和价值,承认水是关键的公平资源,并支持地方领导、参与努力和伙伴关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信