Physiotherapy students' perceptions of how the Cervical Framework influences their clinical reasoning: A qualitative single case study of a Canadian university
Chris Davis , Katie Kowalski , Tim Noblet , Kaitlyn Maddigan , Sitha Soung , Andrew Hubbard , Heather Gillis , Paul Parikh , Jackie Sadi , Andrews Tawiah , Christina Ziebart , Alison Rushton
{"title":"Physiotherapy students' perceptions of how the Cervical Framework influences their clinical reasoning: A qualitative single case study of a Canadian university","authors":"Chris Davis , Katie Kowalski , Tim Noblet , Kaitlyn Maddigan , Sitha Soung , Andrew Hubbard , Heather Gillis , Paul Parikh , Jackie Sadi , Andrews Tawiah , Christina Ziebart , Alison Rushton","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Neck pain and headaches are highly prevalent, often presenting a challenge for physiotherapists when considering differential diagnoses. For guidance, the International Federation of Manual and Musculoskeletal Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) created the International IFOMPT Cervical Framework. Its purpose is to improve clinical reasoning through various functional objectives and design principles. Although the Cervical Framework supports clinical reasoning among physiotherapy students, how this is achieved is unexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>1. To explore physiotherapy students’ perceptions of how the Cervical Framework’s functional objectives influence their clinical reasoning.</div><div>2. To explore physiotherapy students’ perceptions of how the Cervical Framework’s design principles influence their clinical reasoning.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Qualitative, constructivist, exploratory, single-case study.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Semi-structured interviews of physiotherapy students enrolled in one of three educational programs at one university were conducted. Directed qualitative content analysis informed by the Cervical Frameworks’ functional objectives and design principles was used to interpret data.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>From eighteen participants, meaningful data were found for all functional objectives, with particular value when informing clinical reasoning during assessment and improving understanding of risk. Students showed mixed perceived value in informing clinical reasoning during treatment and facilitating patient-centred practice. Physiotherapy students’ perceptions of the Cervical Framework align with most of its design principles, especially its informative, simple, and non-prescriptive nature. Students also perceived the Cervical Framework as long and this may have affected engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Physiotherapy students in this case study perceive the Cervical Framework to influence their clinical reasoning by achieving its functional objectives and by successfully adhering to its design principles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 103405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781225001535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Neck pain and headaches are highly prevalent, often presenting a challenge for physiotherapists when considering differential diagnoses. For guidance, the International Federation of Manual and Musculoskeletal Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) created the International IFOMPT Cervical Framework. Its purpose is to improve clinical reasoning through various functional objectives and design principles. Although the Cervical Framework supports clinical reasoning among physiotherapy students, how this is achieved is unexplored.
Objectives
1. To explore physiotherapy students’ perceptions of how the Cervical Framework’s functional objectives influence their clinical reasoning.
2. To explore physiotherapy students’ perceptions of how the Cervical Framework’s design principles influence their clinical reasoning.
Semi-structured interviews of physiotherapy students enrolled in one of three educational programs at one university were conducted. Directed qualitative content analysis informed by the Cervical Frameworks’ functional objectives and design principles was used to interpret data.
Findings
From eighteen participants, meaningful data were found for all functional objectives, with particular value when informing clinical reasoning during assessment and improving understanding of risk. Students showed mixed perceived value in informing clinical reasoning during treatment and facilitating patient-centred practice. Physiotherapy students’ perceptions of the Cervical Framework align with most of its design principles, especially its informative, simple, and non-prescriptive nature. Students also perceived the Cervical Framework as long and this may have affected engagement.
Conclusion
Physiotherapy students in this case study perceive the Cervical Framework to influence their clinical reasoning by achieving its functional objectives and by successfully adhering to its design principles.
期刊介绍:
Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.