A Two-stage Registration Method for UAV and HMLS Point Clouds in Subtropical Forest

IF 4.5 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Zeyu Yang , Zhiqiang Guo , Ziyan Zhang , Xiaozi Zhou , Yuanyong Dian
{"title":"A Two-stage Registration Method for UAV and HMLS Point Clouds in Subtropical Forest","authors":"Zeyu Yang ,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Guo ,&nbsp;Ziyan Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaozi Zhou ,&nbsp;Yuanyong Dian","doi":"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>HMLS (Handheld Mobile Laser Scanning) and UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) LiDAR are increasingly utilized in forest inventory due to their efficiency and portability. However, challenges such as occlusions, low vertical overlap, and varying point cloud density complicate the fusion of these two datasets. In this study, we propose a novel two-stage method to match HMLS and UAV LiDAR data with different point density at complicate forest with dense canopy cover. The first stage optimizes voxel size selection for varying cloud densities and performs feature extraction. The second stage addresses gross error elimination through the truncated least squares method and performs feature matching using K-D Tree nearest neighbor indexing in combination with Singular Value Decomposition (SVD). The method was tested in 27 forest plots with varying vertical overlaps and stand conditions across Hubei Province, China and compared with four registration methods: Coarse-to-Global Adjustment Strategy (CGAS), Optimized Coarse-to-Fine Algorithms (OCFA), Generalized-ICP (GICP), and Bidirectional-Pearson Improved Method (BPIM). Results show that the proposed approach significantly improves registration accuracy, with error reductions of up to 0.096 m, 0.284 m, and 0.425 m under lower (0.37–0.56), moderate (0.58–0.73), and higher (0.77–0.95) canopy cover, respectively. Stand conditions and tree species influence registration accuracy. The results demonstrate higher accuracy in plots with lower canopy cover, steeper slopes, and fewer shrubs. Coniferous forests, with straighter trunks and fewer branches, provide more distinct feature points, leading to better accuracy than broadleaf forests. Additionally, UAV and HMLS matching accuracy is influenced by flight altitude, with higher altitudes increasing registration errors due to the decreased point density of UAV LiDAR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53227,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 101709"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352938525002629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

HMLS (Handheld Mobile Laser Scanning) and UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) LiDAR are increasingly utilized in forest inventory due to their efficiency and portability. However, challenges such as occlusions, low vertical overlap, and varying point cloud density complicate the fusion of these two datasets. In this study, we propose a novel two-stage method to match HMLS and UAV LiDAR data with different point density at complicate forest with dense canopy cover. The first stage optimizes voxel size selection for varying cloud densities and performs feature extraction. The second stage addresses gross error elimination through the truncated least squares method and performs feature matching using K-D Tree nearest neighbor indexing in combination with Singular Value Decomposition (SVD). The method was tested in 27 forest plots with varying vertical overlaps and stand conditions across Hubei Province, China and compared with four registration methods: Coarse-to-Global Adjustment Strategy (CGAS), Optimized Coarse-to-Fine Algorithms (OCFA), Generalized-ICP (GICP), and Bidirectional-Pearson Improved Method (BPIM). Results show that the proposed approach significantly improves registration accuracy, with error reductions of up to 0.096 m, 0.284 m, and 0.425 m under lower (0.37–0.56), moderate (0.58–0.73), and higher (0.77–0.95) canopy cover, respectively. Stand conditions and tree species influence registration accuracy. The results demonstrate higher accuracy in plots with lower canopy cover, steeper slopes, and fewer shrubs. Coniferous forests, with straighter trunks and fewer branches, provide more distinct feature points, leading to better accuracy than broadleaf forests. Additionally, UAV and HMLS matching accuracy is influenced by flight altitude, with higher altitudes increasing registration errors due to the decreased point density of UAV LiDAR.
亚热带森林无人机与HMLS点云的两阶段配准方法
手持移动激光扫描(HMLS)和无人机(UAV)激光雷达由于其效率和便携性越来越多地应用于森林清查。然而,诸如遮挡、低垂直重叠和变化的点云密度等挑战使这两个数据集的融合变得复杂。本研究提出了一种新的两阶段匹配方法,用于在复杂林冠茂密的森林中匹配不同点密度的HMLS和无人机激光雷达数据。第一阶段优化不同云密度的体素大小选择,并执行特征提取。第二阶段通过截断最小二乘法消除粗误差,并结合奇异值分解(SVD)进行K-D树最近邻索引进行特征匹配。该方法在湖北省27个不同垂直重叠和林分条件的样地进行了试验,并与四种配准方法进行了比较:粗到全局平差策略(CGAS)、优化粗到精细算法(OCFA)、广义icp (GICP)和双向皮尔逊改进方法(BPIM)。结果表明,该方法在低冠层(0.37 ~ 0.56)、中等冠层(0.58 ~ 0.73)和高冠层(0.77 ~ 0.95)条件下,能显著提高配准精度,误差分别降低0.096 m、0.284 m和0.425 m。林分条件和树种影响配准精度。结果表明,在冠层盖度较低、坡度较陡、灌木较少的样地,反演精度较高。针叶林的树干更直,树枝更少,特征点更明显,比阔叶林的精度更高。此外,无人机与HMLS的匹配精度受飞行高度的影响,飞行高度越高,无人机激光雷达的点密度越小,配准误差越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
204
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The journal ''Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment'' (RSASE) focuses on remote sensing studies that address specific topics with an emphasis on environmental and societal issues - regional / local studies with global significance. Subjects are encouraged to have an interdisciplinary approach and include, but are not limited by: " -Global and climate change studies addressing the impact of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, CO2 emission, carbon balance and carbon mitigation, energy system on social and environmental systems -Ecological and environmental issues including biodiversity, ecosystem dynamics, land degradation, atmospheric and water pollution, urban footprint, ecosystem management and natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, typhoons, floods, landslides) -Natural resource studies including land-use in general, biomass estimation, forests, agricultural land, plantation, soils, coral reefs, wetland and water resources -Agriculture, food production systems and food security outcomes -Socio-economic issues including urban systems, urban growth, public health, epidemics, land-use transition and land use conflicts -Oceanography and coastal zone studies, including sea level rise projections, coastlines changes and the ocean-land interface -Regional challenges for remote sensing application techniques, monitoring and analysis, such as cloud screening and atmospheric correction for tropical regions -Interdisciplinary studies combining remote sensing, household survey data, field measurements and models to address environmental, societal and sustainability issues -Quantitative and qualitative analysis that documents the impact of using remote sensing studies in social, political, environmental or economic systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信