Forest fire susceptibility zonation of Mizoram using GIS: A comparative analysis of bivariate models

Jonmenjoy Barman , Indrajit Poddar , Abhijit Sarkar
{"title":"Forest fire susceptibility zonation of Mizoram using GIS: A comparative analysis of bivariate models","authors":"Jonmenjoy Barman ,&nbsp;Indrajit Poddar ,&nbsp;Abhijit Sarkar","doi":"10.1016/j.rines.2025.100126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest fires pose a significant environmental threat in Mizoram, a hilly region in northeast India, contributing to forest degradation, biodiversity loss, and alterations in the regional climate. The present study aimed to prepare forest fire susceptibility (FFS) zones of the state using Frequency Ratio (FR), Evidential Belief Function (EBF), and Index of Entropy (IOE), and their comparative analysis within a Geographic Information System (GIS) environment. The 453 fire incidents were classified into training (248, 70 %), used for model building and testing (105, 30 %) for validation. A total of eleven conditioning factors from different data sources were prepared for evaluation. The FFS was classified into categories from very low to very high using the quantile method. Model validation was performed using ROC–AUC (Receiver Operating Curve-Area Under Curve) metrics, revealing that the EBF model outperformed than FR and IOE with AUC scores of 0.92 (training) and 0.89 (testing). The results identified climatic factors and vegetation, particularly NDVI, as the most significant contributors to FFS. The novelty of this study lies in the combined application of FR, EBF, and IOE models, enabling a comprehensive comparison of their predictive performance and spatial accuracy. Furthermore, improved factor weighting and validation methods provide more reliable spatial insights for forest fire risk management. The results indicate that the majority of high-risk areas are concentrated in steep, sun-exposed southwestern slopes and areas near roads and settlements, where fuel conditions and human activities heighten ignition potential, demonstrating the effectiveness of the integrated modelling approach. These findings provide valuable insights for early fire detection, ecological modelling, land use management, and sustainable forest resource practices. By demonstrating a replicable, data-driven modelling approach in a data-scarce region, this study advances existing FFS research and lays the groundwork for dynamic forecasting and targeted risk mitigation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101084,"journal":{"name":"Results in Earth Sciences","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211714825000688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest fires pose a significant environmental threat in Mizoram, a hilly region in northeast India, contributing to forest degradation, biodiversity loss, and alterations in the regional climate. The present study aimed to prepare forest fire susceptibility (FFS) zones of the state using Frequency Ratio (FR), Evidential Belief Function (EBF), and Index of Entropy (IOE), and their comparative analysis within a Geographic Information System (GIS) environment. The 453 fire incidents were classified into training (248, 70 %), used for model building and testing (105, 30 %) for validation. A total of eleven conditioning factors from different data sources were prepared for evaluation. The FFS was classified into categories from very low to very high using the quantile method. Model validation was performed using ROC–AUC (Receiver Operating Curve-Area Under Curve) metrics, revealing that the EBF model outperformed than FR and IOE with AUC scores of 0.92 (training) and 0.89 (testing). The results identified climatic factors and vegetation, particularly NDVI, as the most significant contributors to FFS. The novelty of this study lies in the combined application of FR, EBF, and IOE models, enabling a comprehensive comparison of their predictive performance and spatial accuracy. Furthermore, improved factor weighting and validation methods provide more reliable spatial insights for forest fire risk management. The results indicate that the majority of high-risk areas are concentrated in steep, sun-exposed southwestern slopes and areas near roads and settlements, where fuel conditions and human activities heighten ignition potential, demonstrating the effectiveness of the integrated modelling approach. These findings provide valuable insights for early fire detection, ecological modelling, land use management, and sustainable forest resource practices. By demonstrating a replicable, data-driven modelling approach in a data-scarce region, this study advances existing FFS research and lays the groundwork for dynamic forecasting and targeted risk mitigation strategies.
基于GIS的米佐拉姆邦森林火灾易感性区划:二元模型的比较分析
森林火灾对印度东北部丘陵地区米佐拉姆邦造成了严重的环境威胁,导致森林退化、生物多样性丧失和区域气候变化。采用频率比(Frequency Ratio)、证据信念函数(evidence Belief Function)和熵值指数(Index of Entropy)在地理信息系统(Geographic Information System, GIS)环境下构建了国家森林火灾易感区(FFS),并进行了对比分析。453起火灾事件被分类为训练(248,70 %),用于模型构建和验证测试(105,30 %)。从不同的数据来源共准备了11个条件因子进行评价。采用分位数法将田间FFS从非常低到非常高进行分类。采用ROC-AUC (Receiver Operating Curve- area Under Curve)指标对模型进行验证,结果显示EBF模型的AUC得分分别为0.92(训练)和0.89(测试),优于FR和IOE。结果表明,气候因素和植被,特别是NDVI,是田间FFS最重要的影响因素。本研究的新颖之处在于结合应用FR、EBF和IOE模型,全面比较了它们的预测性能和空间精度。此外,改进的因子加权和验证方法为森林火灾风险管理提供了更可靠的空间洞察。结果表明,大多数高风险区域集中在陡峭的西南山坡和靠近道路和居民点的地区,在这些地区,燃料条件和人类活动增加了引燃潜力,证明了综合建模方法的有效性。这些发现为早期火灾探测、生态建模、土地利用管理和可持续森林资源实践提供了有价值的见解。通过在数据匮乏地区展示一种可复制的、数据驱动的建模方法,本研究推进了现有的FFS研究,并为动态预测和有针对性的风险缓解战略奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信