Briana Clifton , Yunseo Linda Park , Rida Ashraf , Andrea Gomez Sanchez , Robert J. McCarthy , Mark D. Neuman , Grace Lim
{"title":"A comparative study of patient and provider priorities for cesarean delivery anesthesia care","authors":"Briana Clifton , Yunseo Linda Park , Rida Ashraf , Andrea Gomez Sanchez , Robert J. McCarthy , Mark D. Neuman , Grace Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patient priorities for anesthesia during a cesarean delivery are not well defined. Previous studies have explored patient preferences for cesarean delivery anesthesia but have not evaluated patient-centered endpoints unrelated to the physical experience which are known to be important to patients’ birth experiences, such as being treated with respect, communication, and emotional support. The purpose of this study was to compare patients’ and providers’ priorities for cesarean delivery anesthesia care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective cross-sectional quantitative survey study included patients with recent cesarean deliveries and clinical providers who provide clinical care for cesarean deliveries. Eleven patient-centered factor related to cesarean delivery anesthesia experience were identified based on previously reported findings and results of semi-structured interviews. Participants then completed a forced ranking survey for these 11 factor, ranked in order from most important to least important aspect of cesarean anesthesia care. They also ranked most desired to least desired anesthesia side effects (e.g., pruritus, nausea, pain). Participants also rated their perceived importance of the factor ranked highest and lowest on a 0–10 numeric rating scale (0 = not important at all and 10 = most important imaginable). Rankings from patient and provider groups were compared using Plackett-Luce method using tree-based recursive partitioning.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred forty-four respondents (127 patients, 17 providers) were included in the analysis. “Physical safety of the baby” was ranked highest among patients and was higher than the rank assigned by providers (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Although mothers with vs. without self-reported birth trauma each highly prioritized safety of baby, the relative priority placed on this factor was higher among mothers with self-reported birth trauma. For anesthesia-related side effects, patients and providers agreed that memory loss, spinal headaches, and pain or discomfort during surgery, represented high-priority concerns to avoid; drowsiness, shivering, and pruritus were considered lower-priority. There were ranking differences between in person and digital recruited patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients and providers have discordant views on priorities during cesarean delivery, and similar views on priorities for anesthesia-related side effects. A self-reported history of birth trauma, but not pain during cesarean delivery, is associated with high prioritization of physical safety of mother and baby over other cesarean experience priorities. Future clinical care improvements and research are needed to help patients and providers balance the outcomes most important to patients during and after cesarean delivery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 104760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25003528","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Patient priorities for anesthesia during a cesarean delivery are not well defined. Previous studies have explored patient preferences for cesarean delivery anesthesia but have not evaluated patient-centered endpoints unrelated to the physical experience which are known to be important to patients’ birth experiences, such as being treated with respect, communication, and emotional support. The purpose of this study was to compare patients’ and providers’ priorities for cesarean delivery anesthesia care.
Methods
This prospective cross-sectional quantitative survey study included patients with recent cesarean deliveries and clinical providers who provide clinical care for cesarean deliveries. Eleven patient-centered factor related to cesarean delivery anesthesia experience were identified based on previously reported findings and results of semi-structured interviews. Participants then completed a forced ranking survey for these 11 factor, ranked in order from most important to least important aspect of cesarean anesthesia care. They also ranked most desired to least desired anesthesia side effects (e.g., pruritus, nausea, pain). Participants also rated their perceived importance of the factor ranked highest and lowest on a 0–10 numeric rating scale (0 = not important at all and 10 = most important imaginable). Rankings from patient and provider groups were compared using Plackett-Luce method using tree-based recursive partitioning.
Results
One hundred forty-four respondents (127 patients, 17 providers) were included in the analysis. “Physical safety of the baby” was ranked highest among patients and was higher than the rank assigned by providers (P < 0.001). Although mothers with vs. without self-reported birth trauma each highly prioritized safety of baby, the relative priority placed on this factor was higher among mothers with self-reported birth trauma. For anesthesia-related side effects, patients and providers agreed that memory loss, spinal headaches, and pain or discomfort during surgery, represented high-priority concerns to avoid; drowsiness, shivering, and pruritus were considered lower-priority. There were ranking differences between in person and digital recruited patients.
Conclusion
Patients and providers have discordant views on priorities during cesarean delivery, and similar views on priorities for anesthesia-related side effects. A self-reported history of birth trauma, but not pain during cesarean delivery, is associated with high prioritization of physical safety of mother and baby over other cesarean experience priorities. Future clinical care improvements and research are needed to help patients and providers balance the outcomes most important to patients during and after cesarean delivery.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.