Two-bag Versus One-bag Method for Adult and Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis Management.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Arjuna Srikrishnaraj,Allison Ruth Souter,Nicolas Woods,Kristine Van Aarsen,Alla Iansavitchene,Nathan L Haas,Justin W Yan
{"title":"Two-bag Versus One-bag Method for Adult and Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis Management.","authors":"Arjuna Srikrishnaraj,Allison Ruth Souter,Nicolas Woods,Kristine Van Aarsen,Alla Iansavitchene,Nathan L Haas,Justin W Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.07.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY OBJECTIVE\r\nWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the two-bag versus one-bag method in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) management in adult and pediatric populations.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe study was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, in adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases up to March 2025, with no restrictions on study design. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for bias using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), extracted data, and synthesized findings using RevMan software. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool was used to assess certainty of evidence. Main outcomes of interest were incidence of hypoglycemia and time to DKA resolution.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 4,190 studies screened, 21 met inclusion criteria. These included 9 adult studies with 3,329 patient visits and 12 pediatric studies with 1,385 visits. Of these, one study was at critical risk of bias and was removed from meta-analysis. In both adult and pediatric populations, the two-bag method was associated with reduced incidence of hypoglycemia (risk ratio: 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41 to 0.59; I2=51.8%) and time to DKA resolution (MD: -1.76 hours; 95% CI -2.80 to -0.71; I2=61%). In adults only, the two-bag method was associated with a shortened duration of insulin infusion (MD: -3.74 hours, 95% CI -4.96 to -2.52; I2=0%) and reduced incidence of hypokalemia (risk ratio: 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93; I2=47%).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe two-bag method is associated with reduced incidence of hypoglycemia and time to DKA resolution in both adult and pediatric populations.","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.07.032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the two-bag versus one-bag method in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) management in adult and pediatric populations. METHODS The study was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, in adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases up to March 2025, with no restrictions on study design. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for bias using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool and the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), extracted data, and synthesized findings using RevMan software. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool was used to assess certainty of evidence. Main outcomes of interest were incidence of hypoglycemia and time to DKA resolution. RESULTS Of 4,190 studies screened, 21 met inclusion criteria. These included 9 adult studies with 3,329 patient visits and 12 pediatric studies with 1,385 visits. Of these, one study was at critical risk of bias and was removed from meta-analysis. In both adult and pediatric populations, the two-bag method was associated with reduced incidence of hypoglycemia (risk ratio: 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41 to 0.59; I2=51.8%) and time to DKA resolution (MD: -1.76 hours; 95% CI -2.80 to -0.71; I2=61%). In adults only, the two-bag method was associated with a shortened duration of insulin infusion (MD: -3.74 hours, 95% CI -4.96 to -2.52; I2=0%) and reduced incidence of hypokalemia (risk ratio: 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93; I2=47%). CONCLUSION The two-bag method is associated with reduced incidence of hypoglycemia and time to DKA resolution in both adult and pediatric populations.
成人和儿童糖尿病酮症酸中毒管理的两袋vs一袋方法。
研究目的:我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估两袋法与一袋法在成人和儿童糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)治疗中的安全性和有效性。方法:本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,在前瞻性系统评价注册中注册。通过MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库进行检索,截止到2025年3月,对研究设计没有限制。两位审稿人使用Cochrane Risk of bias 2 (RoB2)工具和非随机干预研究(ROBINS-I)工具独立评估研究的偏倚,提取数据,并使用RevMan软件综合研究结果。采用推荐、评估、发展和评估的分级工具来评估证据的确定性。主要观察结果为低血糖发生率和DKA解决时间。结果在筛选的4190项研究中,有21项符合纳入标准。其中包括9项成人研究,有3329名患者就诊,12项儿科研究,有1385名患者就诊。其中,一项研究存在严重偏倚风险,从meta分析中删除。在成人和儿童人群中,双袋法与降低低血糖发生率(风险比:0.50,95%可信区间[CI] 0.41至0.59;I2=51.8%)和降低DKA解决时间(MD: -1.76小时;95% CI -2.80至-0.71;I2=61%)相关。仅在成人中,两袋方法与缩短胰岛素输注时间(MD: -3.74小时,95% CI: -4.96至-2.52;I2=0%)和降低低钾血症发生率(风险比:0.84,95% CI: 0.76至0.93;I2=47%)相关。结论在成人和儿童人群中,双袋法与降低低血糖发生率和减少DKA解决时间有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
Annals of emergency medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
819
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信