Research Priorities for Nursing and Allied Health: A Priority‐Setting Project Using a Partnership Approach

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Marina Weckend, Lucy Gent, Erin Godecke, Linda Coventry, Gemma Doleman, Amanda Towell‐Barnard, Lisa Whitehead
{"title":"Research Priorities for Nursing and Allied Health: A Priority‐Setting Project Using a Partnership Approach","authors":"Marina Weckend, Lucy Gent, Erin Godecke, Linda Coventry, Gemma Doleman, Amanda Towell‐Barnard, Lisa Whitehead","doi":"10.1111/jan.70190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundResearch priorities guide research activities, funding and resources within health services. To ensure that research efforts are meaningful and impactful, it is vital that organisational research agendas reflect the priorities of both healthcare consumers and staff, alongside broader national and international research frameworks. This paper outlines a research priority‐setting project conducted across two hospitals in Western Australia, aimed at identifying shared research priorities through a collaborative and inclusive approach.AimTo identify the top ten nursing and allied health research priorities for two hospitals in Western Australia.MethodsA modified James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership approach was used, involving health services users, nurses, allied health professionals, and community members in a co‐design approach across three phases. In phase 1, four community conversations were conducted to elicit an initial set of research topics. This data‐informed phase 2, a survey to collect diverse views from a wider participant pool. In phase 3, a pre‐selected sample of potential research priorities was discussed in a consensus workshop to reach a group consensus of the top ten research priorities. Qualitative data was analysed using multi‐step thematic analysis, and quantitative data was analysed using descriptive statistics.ResultsA total of 67, 151 and 18 people participated across study phases 1, 2 and 3, respectively, comprising nurses, allied health professionals, healthcare users, carers, and interested community members. The top ten research priorities reflected three areas: healthcare systems re/design (streamlining care; access to healthcare; patient journey and quality of care), workforce needs (workforce well‐being, retention and adequate staffing; workforce training), and specific health issues and needs (dementia and delirium; mental health; caring for carers; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health; palliative care and elderly people).ConclusionThe research priorities identified in this study for two hospitals in Western Australia reflect the strong desire of nurses, allied health professionals, healthcare users and community members to improve structural issues in healthcare systems. This includes how healthcare systems are designed and integrated with each other, how workforce needs affect service delivery, and a greater focus on holistic service provision for specific health issues and needs.Patient or Public ContributionHealthcare consumers were an integral part of this study. Healthcare consumers were involved in the design of the study, the conduct of the study, and the review of the data analysis.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundResearch priorities guide research activities, funding and resources within health services. To ensure that research efforts are meaningful and impactful, it is vital that organisational research agendas reflect the priorities of both healthcare consumers and staff, alongside broader national and international research frameworks. This paper outlines a research priority‐setting project conducted across two hospitals in Western Australia, aimed at identifying shared research priorities through a collaborative and inclusive approach.AimTo identify the top ten nursing and allied health research priorities for two hospitals in Western Australia.MethodsA modified James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership approach was used, involving health services users, nurses, allied health professionals, and community members in a co‐design approach across three phases. In phase 1, four community conversations were conducted to elicit an initial set of research topics. This data‐informed phase 2, a survey to collect diverse views from a wider participant pool. In phase 3, a pre‐selected sample of potential research priorities was discussed in a consensus workshop to reach a group consensus of the top ten research priorities. Qualitative data was analysed using multi‐step thematic analysis, and quantitative data was analysed using descriptive statistics.ResultsA total of 67, 151 and 18 people participated across study phases 1, 2 and 3, respectively, comprising nurses, allied health professionals, healthcare users, carers, and interested community members. The top ten research priorities reflected three areas: healthcare systems re/design (streamlining care; access to healthcare; patient journey and quality of care), workforce needs (workforce well‐being, retention and adequate staffing; workforce training), and specific health issues and needs (dementia and delirium; mental health; caring for carers; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health; palliative care and elderly people).ConclusionThe research priorities identified in this study for two hospitals in Western Australia reflect the strong desire of nurses, allied health professionals, healthcare users and community members to improve structural issues in healthcare systems. This includes how healthcare systems are designed and integrated with each other, how workforce needs affect service delivery, and a greater focus on holistic service provision for specific health issues and needs.Patient or Public ContributionHealthcare consumers were an integral part of this study. Healthcare consumers were involved in the design of the study, the conduct of the study, and the review of the data analysis.
护理和联合健康的研究重点:使用伙伴关系方法的优先设置项目
研究重点指导卫生服务部门的研究活动、资金和资源。为了确保研究工作有意义和有影响力,组织研究议程必须反映医疗保健消费者和员工的优先事项,以及更广泛的国家和国际研究框架。本文概述了在西澳大利亚州的两家医院进行的研究优先级设置项目,旨在通过协作和包容的方法确定共同的研究优先级。目的为西澳大利亚州的两家医院确定十大护理和相关健康研究重点。方法采用改进的詹姆斯·林德联盟优先设定伙伴关系方法,采用跨三个阶段的共同设计方法,涉及卫生服务使用者、护士、联合卫生专业人员和社区成员。在第一阶段,进行了四次社区对话,以引出一组初始的研究主题。这一数据为第二阶段提供了信息,这是一项从更广泛的参与者群体中收集不同观点的调查。在第三阶段,在一个共识研讨会上讨论了预先选定的潜在研究重点样本,以达成十大研究重点的群体共识。定性数据采用多步专题分析,定量数据采用描述性统计。结果共有67人、151人和18人分别参与了研究的第1、2和3阶段,包括护士、专职卫生专业人员、医疗保健使用者、护理人员和感兴趣的社区成员。十大研究重点反映了三个领域:医疗保健系统重新设计(简化护理;获得医疗保健;患者旅程和护理质量),劳动力需求(劳动力福利,保留和充足的人员配备;劳动力培训),以及具体的健康问题和需求(痴呆症和谵妄;精神健康;护理人员;土著和托雷斯海峡岛民健康;缓和医疗和老年人)。结论:本研究确定的西澳大利亚两家医院的研究重点反映了护士、专职卫生专业人员、医疗保健用户和社区成员改善医疗保健系统结构性问题的强烈愿望。这包括卫生保健系统如何设计和相互集成,劳动力需求如何影响服务提供,以及更加注重针对特定卫生问题和需求提供整体服务。患者或公众贡献医疗保健消费者是本研究的组成部分。医疗保健消费者参与了研究的设计、研究的实施和数据分析的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信