Assessment of a Bioengineering and Nursing Student Partnership for Medical Product Design.

Biomedical engineering education Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1007/s43683-025-00180-y
Renee M Clark, April A Dukes, Lucille Sowko, Mark Gartner
{"title":"Assessment of a Bioengineering and Nursing Student Partnership for Medical Product Design.","authors":"Renee M Clark, April A Dukes, Lucille Sowko, Mark Gartner","doi":"10.1007/s43683-025-00180-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In 2018, the Department of Bioengineering and the School of Nursing at University of Pittsburgh implemented an interdisciplinary partnership that integrated senior nursing students into the bioengineering capstone Senior Design course as part of a National Institutes of Health education grant. This two-semester course requires senior Bioengineering students to synthesize and extend principles from prior coursework toward the design a medical product meeting an unmet clinical need. Senior Design teams interact with clinicians, patients, and caregivers as part of the overall design process to understand the unique challenges of medical product design, including the requirements for regulatory approval. The teams develop iterative designs, fabricate prototypes, and perform both verification and validation testing to evaluate whether product performance criteria are met. Integrating nursing and bioengineering students was anticipated to provide opportunities for interprofessional learning, earlier and more frequent clinical input to the design process, and exposure to a spectrum of unmet clinical needs. Conversely, nursing students were anticipated to gain an understanding of the medical product design process, including regulatory requirements, to potentially empower future innovativeness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The impact of this interdisciplinary partnership on the anticipated outcomes was assessed over a five-year timeframe using research surveys and student interviews. The design self-efficacy survey was administered in a pre-post manner to assess changes in bioengineering and nursing students' confidence, motivation, success expectancy, and apprehension for performing design activity. Students' interprofessional collaborative development was also measured in a retrospective pre-post manner using the interprofessional collaborative competency attainment survey. Finally, a spectrum of student interviews was conducted to obtain perspectives about the interdisciplinary partnership. The data were analyzed using statistical and qualitative data methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results were overwhelmingly positive for the partnership. The results make a strong case for such partnerships and suggest benefits for both student groups, including significant effects for design confidence and a multitude of collaborative competencies. For bioengineering students, the nursing students' clinical knowledge, perspectives, suggestions related to unmet clinical needs, and feedback were mentioned by 84% of interviewees as a partnership benefit. The nursing students cited interprofessional teamwork as the most valuable benefit (71% of interviewees) and indicated that it supported their ability to be innovative.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results make a strong case for engineering and nursing schools to pursue and establish partnerships between their students. This study is situated in the literature as part of an evolving trend of partnership between these two professions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72385,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical engineering education","volume":"5 2","pages":"271-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical engineering education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-025-00180-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In 2018, the Department of Bioengineering and the School of Nursing at University of Pittsburgh implemented an interdisciplinary partnership that integrated senior nursing students into the bioengineering capstone Senior Design course as part of a National Institutes of Health education grant. This two-semester course requires senior Bioengineering students to synthesize and extend principles from prior coursework toward the design a medical product meeting an unmet clinical need. Senior Design teams interact with clinicians, patients, and caregivers as part of the overall design process to understand the unique challenges of medical product design, including the requirements for regulatory approval. The teams develop iterative designs, fabricate prototypes, and perform both verification and validation testing to evaluate whether product performance criteria are met. Integrating nursing and bioengineering students was anticipated to provide opportunities for interprofessional learning, earlier and more frequent clinical input to the design process, and exposure to a spectrum of unmet clinical needs. Conversely, nursing students were anticipated to gain an understanding of the medical product design process, including regulatory requirements, to potentially empower future innovativeness.

Methods: The impact of this interdisciplinary partnership on the anticipated outcomes was assessed over a five-year timeframe using research surveys and student interviews. The design self-efficacy survey was administered in a pre-post manner to assess changes in bioengineering and nursing students' confidence, motivation, success expectancy, and apprehension for performing design activity. Students' interprofessional collaborative development was also measured in a retrospective pre-post manner using the interprofessional collaborative competency attainment survey. Finally, a spectrum of student interviews was conducted to obtain perspectives about the interdisciplinary partnership. The data were analyzed using statistical and qualitative data methods.

Results: The results were overwhelmingly positive for the partnership. The results make a strong case for such partnerships and suggest benefits for both student groups, including significant effects for design confidence and a multitude of collaborative competencies. For bioengineering students, the nursing students' clinical knowledge, perspectives, suggestions related to unmet clinical needs, and feedback were mentioned by 84% of interviewees as a partnership benefit. The nursing students cited interprofessional teamwork as the most valuable benefit (71% of interviewees) and indicated that it supported their ability to be innovative.

Conclusions: The results make a strong case for engineering and nursing schools to pursue and establish partnerships between their students. This study is situated in the literature as part of an evolving trend of partnership between these two professions.

Abstract Image

生物工程和护理学生在医疗产品设计中的合作评估。
目的:2018年,匹兹堡大学生物工程系和护理学院实施了一项跨学科合作伙伴关系,将高级护理学生纳入生物工程顶点高级设计课程,作为美国国立卫生研究院教育资助的一部分。本课程为期两个学期,要求高年级生物工程学生综合并扩展先前课程的原理,以设计满足临床需求的医疗产品。作为整体设计过程的一部分,高级设计团队与临床医生、患者和护理人员进行互动,以了解医疗产品设计的独特挑战,包括法规批准的要求。团队开发迭代设计,制造原型,并执行验证和确认测试,以评估是否满足产品性能标准。整合护理和生物工程专业的学生有望提供跨专业学习的机会,为设计过程提供更早和更频繁的临床输入,并接触到一系列未满足的临床需求。相反,护理专业的学生被期望了解医疗产品设计过程,包括监管要求,以潜在地增强未来的创新能力。方法:通过研究调查和学生访谈,评估了这种跨学科伙伴关系对预期结果的影响,为期五年。设计自我效能感调查以前后方式进行,以评估生物工程和护理专业学生对执行设计活动的信心、动机、成功预期和理解的变化。学生的跨专业协作发展也采用回顾性的职前方式,使用跨专业协作能力成就调查进行测量。最后,进行了一系列的学生访谈,以获得对跨学科伙伴关系的看法。采用统计和定性数据方法对数据进行分析。结果:对合作伙伴关系来说,结果是绝对积极的。研究结果为这种合作关系提供了强有力的论据,并表明对两个学生群体都有好处,包括对设计信心和大量合作能力的显著影响。对于生物工程专业的学生,84%的受访者认为护理专业学生的临床知识、观点、未满足临床需求的相关建议和反馈是合作伙伴关系的利益。护生认为跨专业团队合作是最有价值的好处(71%的受访者),并表示这有助于他们的创新能力。结论:结果为工程和护理学校追求和建立学生之间的伙伴关系提供了强有力的理由。这项研究是坐落在这两个职业之间的伙伴关系不断发展的趋势的一部分的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信