{"title":"Prognostic Impact of Immune-Related Adverse Events on Combination Immune Checkpoint/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition for Metastatic Renal Cancer.","authors":"Bunpei Isoda, Masanobu Shiga, Shuya Kandori, Shota Takahashi, Akifumi Omiya, Tomoki Ishida, Kotoe Matsuda, Hiromichi Sakurai, Bryan J Mathis, Ken Tanaka, Manabu Komine, Masahiro Iinuma, Akira Joraku, Hiromitsu Negoro, Masakazu Tsutsumi, Takamitsu Inoue, Jun Miyazaki, Hiroyuki Nishiyama","doi":"10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use are standard for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), leading to improved outcomes. However, due to a lack of predictive biomarkers, the presence or absence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) is currently used as a predictive factor in clinical practice. To elucidate the impact of irAEs on efficacy, a cohort of patients with mRCC who received ICI-based combination therapy as initial treatment was analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received dual-ICI therapy (ICI-ICI, N = 55) or ICI and TKI therapy (ICI-TKI, N = 55). Subsequent to this initial categorization, each group was further subdivided based on the presence or absence of irAEs. In the ICI-ICI group, patients with irAEs exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival [PFS; OS (median): not reached vs. 17.9 months, P = 0.03/PFS (median): 51.4 vs. 5.8 months, P < 0.01]. Conversely, no such correlation was observed between irAEs and OS/PFS in the ICI-TKI group. [OS (median): 26.3 months vs. not reached, P = 0.73/PFS (median): 16.8 months vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.38] Furthermore, treatment discontinuation due to AEs accounted for 65% (N = 32) in the ICI-ICI group and 57% (N = 24) in the ICI-TKI group, with a slightly higher tendency observed in the ICI-ICI group. These findings suggest that the prognostic impact of irAEs may differ depending on the treatment combination, and further basic research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>In patients with mRCC who received ICI-ICI, the occurrence of irAEs was associated with improved survival outcomes, whereas no such association was observed in patients who received ICI-TKI. This suggests that irAEs may reflect the favorable immune response specific to ICI-ICI therapy, whereas differences in the tumor microenvironment, particularly involving neutrophils, in ICI-TKI patients may influence treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":72516,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research communications","volume":" ","pages":"1681-1689"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) use are standard for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), leading to improved outcomes. However, due to a lack of predictive biomarkers, the presence or absence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) is currently used as a predictive factor in clinical practice. To elucidate the impact of irAEs on efficacy, a cohort of patients with mRCC who received ICI-based combination therapy as initial treatment was analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received dual-ICI therapy (ICI-ICI, N = 55) or ICI and TKI therapy (ICI-TKI, N = 55). Subsequent to this initial categorization, each group was further subdivided based on the presence or absence of irAEs. In the ICI-ICI group, patients with irAEs exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival [PFS; OS (median): not reached vs. 17.9 months, P = 0.03/PFS (median): 51.4 vs. 5.8 months, P < 0.01]. Conversely, no such correlation was observed between irAEs and OS/PFS in the ICI-TKI group. [OS (median): 26.3 months vs. not reached, P = 0.73/PFS (median): 16.8 months vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.38] Furthermore, treatment discontinuation due to AEs accounted for 65% (N = 32) in the ICI-ICI group and 57% (N = 24) in the ICI-TKI group, with a slightly higher tendency observed in the ICI-ICI group. These findings suggest that the prognostic impact of irAEs may differ depending on the treatment combination, and further basic research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
Significance: In patients with mRCC who received ICI-ICI, the occurrence of irAEs was associated with improved survival outcomes, whereas no such association was observed in patients who received ICI-TKI. This suggests that irAEs may reflect the favorable immune response specific to ICI-ICI therapy, whereas differences in the tumor microenvironment, particularly involving neutrophils, in ICI-TKI patients may influence treatment response.