The impact of clinically insignificant residual fragments following endourological management of urolithiasis: a systematic review of complications and re-intervention rates.
Alberto Quarà, Letizia M Jannello, Alejandra Bravo-Balado, Stefano Moretto, Federico Zorzi, Ugo Gradilone, Hubert Werth, Mariela Corrales, Marie-Lou Letouche, Luigi Candela, Steeve Doizi, Frederic Panthier, Cristian Fiori, Olivier Traxer
{"title":"The impact of clinically insignificant residual fragments following endourological management of urolithiasis: a systematic review of complications and re-intervention rates.","authors":"Alberto Quarà, Letizia M Jannello, Alejandra Bravo-Balado, Stefano Moretto, Federico Zorzi, Ugo Gradilone, Hubert Werth, Mariela Corrales, Marie-Lou Letouche, Luigi Candela, Steeve Doizi, Frederic Panthier, Cristian Fiori, Olivier Traxer","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06456-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving stone-free status (SFS) is a key goal of endourological treatment, yet definitions of SFS and clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) remain controversial. While CIRF is frequently defined as residual fragments ≤4 mm, there is no consensus on its clinical significance regarding complications and re-intervention needs. We evaluate the risk of complications and the need for re-intervention associated with the presence of CIRF following endourological treatment for urolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web Of Science, and Embase databases were searched for articles relating to SFS and CIRF definitions and outcomes, in February 2025, using keyword combinations: \"stone-free rate,\" \"residual fragments,\" \"clinically insignificant residual fragments,\" \"urinary calculi,\" \"urolithiasis,\" \"complications,\" and \"outcome\". Inclusion criteria were all studies with SFS/CIRF definition and complications associated with residual fragments following treatment (shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Fifty-two studies met inclusion criteria. From the pooled analysis the probability of spontaneous expulsion of CIRF≤4 mm was 33% (95% CI: 12-50%; P<0.001), while regrowth occurred in 32% (95% CI: 23-40%; P<0.001). CIRF-related complications were observed in 27% (95% CI: 21-34%; P<0.001), and the re-intervention rate was 21% (95% CI: 16-26%; P<0.001). Within a variable mean follow-up ranging from 3 to 59 months. The risk of bias was moderate overall, with single-arm studies exhibiting the highest bias risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with CIRF≤4 mm should be monitored closely and informed about the non-neglectable likelihood of complications and of re-intervention. On the other hand, they have one probability out of three of spontaneous passage. Endourologist and patients should be aware of these outcomes to better plan the management, follow-up, and the \"insignificant\" nature of residual fragments. Hence, the aim of surgeries should be achieving the complete SFS, especially in high-risk stone former patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06456-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Achieving stone-free status (SFS) is a key goal of endourological treatment, yet definitions of SFS and clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) remain controversial. While CIRF is frequently defined as residual fragments ≤4 mm, there is no consensus on its clinical significance regarding complications and re-intervention needs. We evaluate the risk of complications and the need for re-intervention associated with the presence of CIRF following endourological treatment for urolithiasis.
Evidence acquisition: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web Of Science, and Embase databases were searched for articles relating to SFS and CIRF definitions and outcomes, in February 2025, using keyword combinations: "stone-free rate," "residual fragments," "clinically insignificant residual fragments," "urinary calculi," "urolithiasis," "complications," and "outcome". Inclusion criteria were all studies with SFS/CIRF definition and complications associated with residual fragments following treatment (shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy).
Evidence synthesis: Fifty-two studies met inclusion criteria. From the pooled analysis the probability of spontaneous expulsion of CIRF≤4 mm was 33% (95% CI: 12-50%; P<0.001), while regrowth occurred in 32% (95% CI: 23-40%; P<0.001). CIRF-related complications were observed in 27% (95% CI: 21-34%; P<0.001), and the re-intervention rate was 21% (95% CI: 16-26%; P<0.001). Within a variable mean follow-up ranging from 3 to 59 months. The risk of bias was moderate overall, with single-arm studies exhibiting the highest bias risk.
Conclusions: Patients with CIRF≤4 mm should be monitored closely and informed about the non-neglectable likelihood of complications and of re-intervention. On the other hand, they have one probability out of three of spontaneous passage. Endourologist and patients should be aware of these outcomes to better plan the management, follow-up, and the "insignificant" nature of residual fragments. Hence, the aim of surgeries should be achieving the complete SFS, especially in high-risk stone former patients.