"You Feel Like a Bystander in Your Own Life"-A Qualitative Study of Men's Experience Cancer Healthcare.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Ricco S Jørgensen, Elisabeth Coyne, Karin B Dieperink
{"title":"\"You Feel Like a Bystander in Your Own Life\"-A Qualitative Study of Men's Experience Cancer Healthcare.","authors":"Ricco S Jørgensen, Elisabeth Coyne, Karin B Dieperink","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explores the experience of healthcare professional (HCP) interactions for men with cancer. Additionally, to explore whether there is a disparity in how they perceive the interaction based on their relationship status-whether they are single or cohabiting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The design was a qualitative descriptive study with a hermeneutic approach, using in-depth focus group interviews. Two focus group interviews were conducted between December 2023 and January 2024, with 11 men participating. The participants were divided into two groups based on whether they were single or cohabiting. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were extracted from the data. (1) \"Perceptions of received support for caregivers vary based on living status\" emphasizing the vital support caregivers provide to men who are cohabiting. The caregivers of single men are not automatically included in discussions with HCPs. (2) \"The importance of information and healthcare professional relationships\" underscores the disparity in the relationship between single men and HCPs compared to cohabiting men. (3) \"Masculine norms and health behaviour\" explores how traditional masculine norms influence men's health behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cohabiting men feel acknowledged and adequately informed about their illness and therefore report a generally positive experience with HCPs. Single men feel overlooked by HCPs, sensing a lack of interest in their individual circumstances and life experiences. Consequently, single men advocate for continuity in care, believing it would enable HCPs to better understand their needs and provide the necessary support.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>There is a need to recognize the diversity among men for a more individualized approach to care. Recognizing and acknowledging the male perspective enables the development of interventions tailored to enhance the quality of life. Single men express a desire for continuity in their care. A consistent patient-nurse relationship fosters trust and therefore encourages men to open up.</p>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"151950"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study explores the experience of healthcare professional (HCP) interactions for men with cancer. Additionally, to explore whether there is a disparity in how they perceive the interaction based on their relationship status-whether they are single or cohabiting.

Methods: The design was a qualitative descriptive study with a hermeneutic approach, using in-depth focus group interviews. Two focus group interviews were conducted between December 2023 and January 2024, with 11 men participating. The participants were divided into two groups based on whether they were single or cohabiting. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes were extracted from the data. (1) "Perceptions of received support for caregivers vary based on living status" emphasizing the vital support caregivers provide to men who are cohabiting. The caregivers of single men are not automatically included in discussions with HCPs. (2) "The importance of information and healthcare professional relationships" underscores the disparity in the relationship between single men and HCPs compared to cohabiting men. (3) "Masculine norms and health behaviour" explores how traditional masculine norms influence men's health behaviors.

Conclusions: Cohabiting men feel acknowledged and adequately informed about their illness and therefore report a generally positive experience with HCPs. Single men feel overlooked by HCPs, sensing a lack of interest in their individual circumstances and life experiences. Consequently, single men advocate for continuity in care, believing it would enable HCPs to better understand their needs and provide the necessary support.

Implications for nursing practice: There is a need to recognize the diversity among men for a more individualized approach to care. Recognizing and acknowledging the male perspective enables the development of interventions tailored to enhance the quality of life. Single men express a desire for continuity in their care. A consistent patient-nurse relationship fosters trust and therefore encourages men to open up.

“你在自己的生活中感觉像一个旁观者”——对男性癌症保健经历的定性研究。
目的:本研究探讨医疗保健专业人员(HCP)与男性癌症患者互动的经验。此外,为了探索他们如何看待基于他们的关系状态的互动,无论他们是单身还是同居,是否存在差异。方法:采用深度焦点小组访谈,采用解释学方法进行定性描述性研究。在2023年12月至2024年1月期间进行了两次焦点小组访谈,共有11名男性参与。参与者根据他们是单身还是同居被分为两组。数据采用专题分析进行分析。结果:从数据中提取出三个主题。(1)“对照顾者获得的支持的感知因生活状况而异”,强调照顾者对同居男性提供的重要支持。单身男性的照顾者不会自动包括在与健康护理人员的讨论中。(2)“信息与医护专业关系的重要性”强调了单身男性与医护专业人员关系与同居男性之间的差异。(3)“男性规范与健康行为”探讨传统男性规范对男性健康行为的影响。结论:同居男性感到自己的疾病得到了承认,并得到了充分的信息,因此报告了对HCPs的总体积极体验。单身男性觉得自己被hcp忽视了,觉得对他们的个人情况和生活经历缺乏兴趣。因此,单身男子主张护理的连续性,认为这将使卫生保健人员更好地了解他们的需求并提供必要的支持。对护理实践的启示:有必要认识到男性之间的多样性,以采取更加个性化的护理方法。认识到并承认男性的观点,就能制定出适合提高生活质量的干预措施。单身男人表达了对他们的照顾的连续性的渴望。始终如一的医护关系可以培养信任,从而鼓励男性敞开心扉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信