Pharyngeal electrical stimulation to treat dysphagia in acute stroke: learnings from cases in the PhEED clinical trial.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Richard L Harvey, Richard Smith, Rajaram Bathula, Lisa Everton, Nicole Rup, Jeff Saver, Bonnie Martin-Harris, Rainer Dziewas, Satish Mistry, Shaheen Hamdy, Philip Bath
{"title":"Pharyngeal electrical stimulation to treat dysphagia in acute stroke: learnings from cases in the PhEED clinical trial.","authors":"Richard L Harvey, Richard Smith, Rajaram Bathula, Lisa Everton, Nicole Rup, Jeff Saver, Bonnie Martin-Harris, Rainer Dziewas, Satish Mistry, Shaheen Hamdy, Philip Bath","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v57.43538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of pharyngeal electrical stimulation in improving dysphagia post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized, sham-controlled, blinded multicentre clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>Seventeen patients with acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke experiencing dysphagia, indicated by a penetration aspiration scale score of 4-8 on videofluoroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sites enrolled 3 open-label roll-in participants and then randomized subsequent participants to either stimulation or sham treatment. Study interventions were delivered for 10 min daily over 3 consecutive days. Prior to data lock the primary outcome was modified to the change in dysphagia severity rating scale from pre-treatment to end of follow-up period. Secondary outcomes included penetration-aspiration scale score assessed via videofluoroscopy 48 h after final treatment and functional oral intake scale, measured at 7, 14, and 83 days post-randomization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial was halted early due to low recruitment, with 15 participants receiving active stimulation and 2 receiving sham treatment. Active stimulation significantly reduced dysphagia severity at day 83 (difference: -4, p = 0.027). Improvements were observed in diet and supervision subscales, and functional oral intake scores. Of those treated, 67% were discharged home, with no serious adverse events attributable to the intervention noted in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharyngeal electrical stimulation was safe and associated with reduced dysphagia severity in stroke patients, warranting further validation in larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"57 ","pages":"jrm43538"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12427991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.43538","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy of pharyngeal electrical stimulation in improving dysphagia post-stroke.

Design: A randomized, sham-controlled, blinded multicentre clinical trial.

Subjects/patients: Seventeen patients with acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke experiencing dysphagia, indicated by a penetration aspiration scale score of 4-8 on videofluoroscopy.

Methods: Sites enrolled 3 open-label roll-in participants and then randomized subsequent participants to either stimulation or sham treatment. Study interventions were delivered for 10 min daily over 3 consecutive days. Prior to data lock the primary outcome was modified to the change in dysphagia severity rating scale from pre-treatment to end of follow-up period. Secondary outcomes included penetration-aspiration scale score assessed via videofluoroscopy 48 h after final treatment and functional oral intake scale, measured at 7, 14, and 83 days post-randomization.

Results: The trial was halted early due to low recruitment, with 15 participants receiving active stimulation and 2 receiving sham treatment. Active stimulation significantly reduced dysphagia severity at day 83 (difference: -4, p = 0.027). Improvements were observed in diet and supervision subscales, and functional oral intake scores. Of those treated, 67% were discharged home, with no serious adverse events attributable to the intervention noted in either group.

Conclusion: Pharyngeal electrical stimulation was safe and associated with reduced dysphagia severity in stroke patients, warranting further validation in larger studies.

Abstract Image

咽电刺激治疗急性脑卒中患者吞咽困难:从PhEED临床试验病例的学习。
目的:评价咽电刺激对脑卒中后吞咽困难的治疗效果。设计:随机、假对照、盲法多中心临床试验。受试者/患者:17例急性缺血性或出血性中风患者出现吞咽困难,透视透视穿刺吸入评分为4-8分。方法:网站招募了3名开放标签的参与者,然后将随后的参与者随机分配到刺激或假治疗组。研究干预每天10分钟,连续3天。在数据锁定之前,主要结局被修改为从治疗前到随访结束时吞咽困难严重程度评分量表的变化。次要结果包括最终治疗后48小时通过显像透视评估的穿透-吸入量表评分,以及随机分组后7、14和83天测量的功能性口服摄入量表。结果:由于招募人数少,试验提前终止,15名受试者接受积极刺激,2名受试者接受假治疗。主动刺激显著降低了83天吞咽困难的严重程度(差异:-4,p = 0.027)。饮食和监督亚量表以及功能性口服摄入评分均有改善。在接受治疗的患者中,67%出院回家,两组均未发生严重不良事件。结论:咽电刺激是安全的,并且与脑卒中患者吞咽困难严重程度的降低相关,需要在更大规模的研究中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信