Adoption of Health Information Technologies by Area Socioeconomic Deprivation Among US Hospitals.

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alice S Yan, Nate C Apathy, Jie Chen
{"title":"Adoption of Health Information Technologies by Area Socioeconomic Deprivation Among US Hospitals.","authors":"Alice S Yan, Nate C Apathy, Jie Chen","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Access to and quality of care vary substantially by area socioeconomic status. Expanding hospital health information technology (HIT) adoption may help reduce these disparities, given hospitals' central role in serving underserved populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine variations in US hospital adoption of telehealth and health information exchange (HIE) functionalities by hospital service area (HSA) socioeconomic deprivation.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study links data from the 2018-2023 American Hospital Association Annual Survey and Information Technology Survey with HSA-level area deprivation index. Nonfederal acute care hospitals with complete data on HIT outcomes, comprising 16 646 observations for the telehealth outcomes and 9218 observations for the HIE outcomes across 6 years, were included. Data were analyzed from February 2024 to February 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>HSA-level area deprivation index in quartiles.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Hospital adoption of treatment-stage telehealth and postdischarge telehealth services and HIE infrastructure supporting electronic data query and availability. Descriptive, regression, and Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analyses and visualized time trends in hospital HIT adoption were used in analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 16 646 hospital-level observations and 9218 observations for health information exchange functionalities. Hospitals in the most socioeconomically deprived HSAs were significantly less likely to adopt HIT compared with those in the least deprived areas (treatment-stage telehealth: marginal effect [ME], -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01; postdischarge telehealth: ME, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.01; electronic data query capability: ME, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01; electronic data availability: ME, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.11 to -0.01). Year fixed effects indicated significant increases in HIT adoption from 2018 to 2023, regardless of HSA deprivation level. Decomposition analyses showed that differences in hospital bed size, urban/rural location, and accountable care organization participation explained a substantial portion of the disparities by HSA deprivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, hospitals in more socioeconomically disadvantaged HSAs remained likely to adopt telehealth and HIE functionalities. Nevertheless, HIT adoption has grown steadily over time. Accountable care organization participation may support HIT infrastructure and help reduce geographic disparities in adoption and access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 9","pages":"e253035"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413650/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Access to and quality of care vary substantially by area socioeconomic status. Expanding hospital health information technology (HIT) adoption may help reduce these disparities, given hospitals' central role in serving underserved populations.

Objective: To examine variations in US hospital adoption of telehealth and health information exchange (HIE) functionalities by hospital service area (HSA) socioeconomic deprivation.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study links data from the 2018-2023 American Hospital Association Annual Survey and Information Technology Survey with HSA-level area deprivation index. Nonfederal acute care hospitals with complete data on HIT outcomes, comprising 16 646 observations for the telehealth outcomes and 9218 observations for the HIE outcomes across 6 years, were included. Data were analyzed from February 2024 to February 2025.

Exposures: HSA-level area deprivation index in quartiles.

Main outcomes and measures: Hospital adoption of treatment-stage telehealth and postdischarge telehealth services and HIE infrastructure supporting electronic data query and availability. Descriptive, regression, and Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analyses and visualized time trends in hospital HIT adoption were used in analyses.

Results: This study included 16 646 hospital-level observations and 9218 observations for health information exchange functionalities. Hospitals in the most socioeconomically deprived HSAs were significantly less likely to adopt HIT compared with those in the least deprived areas (treatment-stage telehealth: marginal effect [ME], -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01; postdischarge telehealth: ME, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.01; electronic data query capability: ME, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01; electronic data availability: ME, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.11 to -0.01). Year fixed effects indicated significant increases in HIT adoption from 2018 to 2023, regardless of HSA deprivation level. Decomposition analyses showed that differences in hospital bed size, urban/rural location, and accountable care organization participation explained a substantial portion of the disparities by HSA deprivation.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, hospitals in more socioeconomically disadvantaged HSAs remained likely to adopt telehealth and HIE functionalities. Nevertheless, HIT adoption has grown steadily over time. Accountable care organization participation may support HIT infrastructure and help reduce geographic disparities in adoption and access to care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

美国医院社会经济贫困地区采用卫生信息技术的情况
重要性:获得护理的机会和质量因地区的社会经济地位而有很大差异。考虑到医院在服务服务不足人群方面的核心作用,扩大医院卫生信息技术(HIT)的采用可能有助于缩小这些差距。目的:研究美国医院采用远程医疗和健康信息交换(HIE)功能的差异,以了解医院服务区(HSA)的社会经济剥夺情况。设计、环境和参与者:本横断面研究将2018-2023年美国医院协会年度调查和信息技术调查的数据与hsa水平的区域剥夺指数联系起来。纳入了具有HIT结果完整数据的非联邦急症护理医院,包括16 646次远程医疗结果观察和9218次6年HIE结果观察。数据分析时间为2024年2月至2025年2月。暴露:hsa水平的四分位数面积剥夺指数。主要成果和措施:医院采用治疗阶段远程保健和出院后远程保健服务,以及支持电子数据查询和可用性的HIE基础设施。采用描述性、回归分析和Blinder-Oaxaca分解分析和可视化时间趋势分析医院采用HIT。结果:本研究包括16 646个医院层面的观察和9218个健康信息交换功能的观察。社会经济最贫困地区的医院采用HIT的可能性明显低于最贫困地区的医院(治疗阶段远程医疗:边际效应[ME], -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06至-0.01;出院后远程医疗:ME, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.07至0.01;电子数据查询能力:ME, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06至-0.01;电子数据可用性:ME, -0.06; 95% CI, -0.11至-0.01)。年度固定效应表明,从2018年到2023年,无论HSA剥夺程度如何,HSA的采用都显着增加。分解分析表明,医院床位大小、城市/农村位置和负责任的护理组织参与的差异解释了HSA剥夺的很大一部分差异。结论和相关性:在本研究中,社会经济条件较差的HSAs的医院仍然可能采用远程医疗和HIE功能。然而,随着时间的推移,HIT的采用一直在稳步增长。负责任的医疗机构的参与可以支持HIT基础设施,并有助于减少在采用和获得医疗服务方面的地理差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信