Clinician Specialties, Quality Score and Shared Savings Receipt in Accountable Care Organizations.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mariétou H Ouayogodé, Xiaodan Liang
{"title":"Clinician Specialties, Quality Score and Shared Savings Receipt in Accountable Care Organizations.","authors":"Mariétou H Ouayogodé, Xiaodan Liang","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the relationship between the changing Accountable Care Organizations-ACO workforce and ACOs' shared savings earnings and quality performance.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Medicare Shared Savings Program-MSSP provider-level research identifiable files, performance year financial and quality report public use files, and National Physician Compare data (2013-2021).</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We characterized 865 MSSPs, separately pre- (2013-2019) and post-pandemic (2020-2021) according to the percentage of primary care physicians (PCPs), non-physicians, specialists, and other specialty, financial risk model, assigned Medicare beneficiary demographics, clinical risk factors, and provider supply by specialty within the MSSP's primary service state, (total and per-capita) shared savings earnings/losses owed and quality score. Longitudinal ordinary least-squares regressions with random effects were estimated to assess the association between MSSP provider specialty mix and annual (1) per-capita shared savings/losses and (2) quality score, controlling for risk model, beneficiary characteristics, provider supply, and year factors. We also compared outcomes across MSSPs, 32 Pioneers and 62 Next Generation-NGACOs.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>PCPs represented 33.9% of MSSP's workforce, on average. Higher percentages of PCPs and non-physicians were associated with higher per-capita earned shared savings and quality scores among MSSPs. A 1-percentage-point (ppt) increase in PCPs and non-physicians was associated with higher per-capita shared savings of $2.25 (p < 0.01) and $1.82 (p = 0.03), respectively, pre-COVID, and $2.73 (p < 0.01) and $1.81 (p = 0.14) post-COVID. We estimated increases in quality scores among MSSPs of ~0.1 ppt with a 1 ppt increase in PCPs, non-physicians, and specialists only pre-pandemic. No statistically significant relationships were estimated between provider specialty mix and performance measures in Pioneers and NGACOs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher percentages of PCPs and non-physicians were associated with higher per-capita shared savings earnings and quality scores among MSSPs. As new federal initiatives continue to unfold, value-based payment models increasing incentives for primary care should be monitored to determine their ability to further improve care efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70033"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the relationship between the changing Accountable Care Organizations-ACO workforce and ACOs' shared savings earnings and quality performance.

Data sources: Medicare Shared Savings Program-MSSP provider-level research identifiable files, performance year financial and quality report public use files, and National Physician Compare data (2013-2021).

Study setting and design: We characterized 865 MSSPs, separately pre- (2013-2019) and post-pandemic (2020-2021) according to the percentage of primary care physicians (PCPs), non-physicians, specialists, and other specialty, financial risk model, assigned Medicare beneficiary demographics, clinical risk factors, and provider supply by specialty within the MSSP's primary service state, (total and per-capita) shared savings earnings/losses owed and quality score. Longitudinal ordinary least-squares regressions with random effects were estimated to assess the association between MSSP provider specialty mix and annual (1) per-capita shared savings/losses and (2) quality score, controlling for risk model, beneficiary characteristics, provider supply, and year factors. We also compared outcomes across MSSPs, 32 Pioneers and 62 Next Generation-NGACOs.

Principal findings: PCPs represented 33.9% of MSSP's workforce, on average. Higher percentages of PCPs and non-physicians were associated with higher per-capita earned shared savings and quality scores among MSSPs. A 1-percentage-point (ppt) increase in PCPs and non-physicians was associated with higher per-capita shared savings of $2.25 (p < 0.01) and $1.82 (p = 0.03), respectively, pre-COVID, and $2.73 (p < 0.01) and $1.81 (p = 0.14) post-COVID. We estimated increases in quality scores among MSSPs of ~0.1 ppt with a 1 ppt increase in PCPs, non-physicians, and specialists only pre-pandemic. No statistically significant relationships were estimated between provider specialty mix and performance measures in Pioneers and NGACOs.

Conclusions: Higher percentages of PCPs and non-physicians were associated with higher per-capita shared savings earnings and quality scores among MSSPs. As new federal initiatives continue to unfold, value-based payment models increasing incentives for primary care should be monitored to determine their ability to further improve care efficiency.

临床医生专业,质量评分和共享储蓄收据在负责任的医疗机构。
目的:评估责任护理组织- aco员工队伍变化与aco共享储蓄收入和质量绩效之间的关系。数据来源:医疗保险共享储蓄计划- mssp提供者级别的研究可识别文件,绩效年度财务和质量报告公共使用文件,以及国家医师比较数据(2013-2021)。研究设置和设计:我们根据初级保健医生(pcp)、非医生、专家和其他专业的百分比、财务风险模型、指定的医疗保险受益人人口统计数据、临床风险因素和MSSP主要服务状态下专科的提供者供应、(总和人均)共享储蓄收益/损失和质量评分,分别对865家MSSP进行了特征描述(2013-2019年)和大流行后(2020-2021年)。采用随机效应的纵向普通最小二乘回归来评估MSSP提供者专业组合与年度(1)人均共享储蓄/损失和(2)质量评分之间的关系,控制风险模型、受益人特征、提供者供应和年份因素。我们还比较了mssp、32家先锋和62家下一代ngaco的结果。主要发现:pcp平均占MSSP员工总数的33.9%。在mssp中,pcp和非医生的比例越高,人均收入共享储蓄和质量得分越高。pcp和非医生比例每增加1个百分点(ppt),人均共享储蓄就会增加2.25美元(p)。结论:pcp和非医生比例越高,mssp的人均共享储蓄收入和质量得分就越高。随着新的联邦倡议不断展开,基于价值的支付模式增加了对初级保健的激励,应加以监测,以确定其进一步提高护理效率的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信