{"title":"How big is the medical writing industry? Why it matters.","authors":"Maud Bernisson, Sergio Sismondo","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical writing is a key element in pharmaceutical companies' efforts to shape the relevant medical science literature. As part of what is called 'publication planning', medical writing can influence the knowledge base on which prescribers make decisions, and can build specific claims in targeted sales efforts. Most publication planning is done by hired medical education and communication companies (MECCs), with the rest done by other commercial entities, such as units of pharmaceutical companies or of contract research organizations, that provide essentially the same services as MECCs. Here we provide an estimate of the number of MECCs and comparable entities contributing to the medical science literature in English. To identify these companies, we collected data from Web of Science (858 named firms from 20 498 papers mentioning medical writing assistance), LinkedIn (410 company profiles), and Google and DuckDuckGo (68 company websites). After removing duplicates and false positives, we found 1148 MECCs and other comparable entities providing medical writing services. More than 50% of Web of Science papers that acknowledged medical writing support are sponsored by only ten pharmaceutical companies. Most of the remaining papers in our database are sponsored by other pharmaceutical, device, and biotechnology companies. This study likely undercounts MECCs, because it depends on some level of transparency in publications or other leakage of information. Our combining multiple sources for the data should limit the undercount of MECCs. The study does not identify MECCs that work exclusively in languages other than English.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Medical writing is a key element in pharmaceutical companies' efforts to shape the relevant medical science literature. As part of what is called 'publication planning', medical writing can influence the knowledge base on which prescribers make decisions, and can build specific claims in targeted sales efforts. Most publication planning is done by hired medical education and communication companies (MECCs), with the rest done by other commercial entities, such as units of pharmaceutical companies or of contract research organizations, that provide essentially the same services as MECCs. Here we provide an estimate of the number of MECCs and comparable entities contributing to the medical science literature in English. To identify these companies, we collected data from Web of Science (858 named firms from 20 498 papers mentioning medical writing assistance), LinkedIn (410 company profiles), and Google and DuckDuckGo (68 company websites). After removing duplicates and false positives, we found 1148 MECCs and other comparable entities providing medical writing services. More than 50% of Web of Science papers that acknowledged medical writing support are sponsored by only ten pharmaceutical companies. Most of the remaining papers in our database are sponsored by other pharmaceutical, device, and biotechnology companies. This study likely undercounts MECCs, because it depends on some level of transparency in publications or other leakage of information. Our combining multiple sources for the data should limit the undercount of MECCs. The study does not identify MECCs that work exclusively in languages other than English.
医学写作是制药公司努力塑造相关医学科学文献的关键因素。作为所谓的“出版计划”的一部分,医学写作可以影响处方医生做出决定的知识库,并可以在有针对性的销售工作中建立具体的主张。大多数出版策划是由受雇的医学教育和传播公司(mecc)完成的,其余的由其他商业实体完成,如制药公司的单位或合同研究组织,它们提供的服务基本上与mecc相同。在这里,我们提供了对英文医学科学文献的mecc和可比实体数量的估计。为了确定这些公司,我们收集了Web of Science(从20498篇提到医疗写作辅助的论文中筛选出858家公司)、LinkedIn(410家公司简介)以及谷歌和DuckDuckGo(68家公司网站)的数据。在去除重复和假阳性后,我们发现了1148个mecc和其他提供医疗写作服务的可比实体。在承认支持医学写作的Web of Science论文中,超过50%的论文仅由10家制药公司赞助。我们数据库中剩余的大部分论文都是由其他制药、设备和生物技术公司赞助的。这项研究可能低估了mecc,因为它取决于出版物的某种程度的透明度或其他信息的泄露。我们将多个来源的数据结合起来,应该可以限制对mecc的低估。这项研究并没有确定只使用英语以外语言的mecc。
期刊介绍:
Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.