{"title":"Parent's Process of Escalation of Care for Their Deteriorating Children Admitted to Paediatric Wards: A Grounded Theory.","authors":"Catia Genna, Kiara Ros Thekkan, Immacolata Dall'oglio, Emanuela Tiozzo, Massimiliano Raponi, Corrado Cecchetti, Orsola Gawronski","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Explore the care escalation process initiated by parents concerned about their hospitalised child's deterioration and healthcare providers' response to parental concerns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study using Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included healthcare providers, cultural mediators and parents of children hospitalized for ≥ 3 days, who had experienced previous urgent intensive care admission or parental concern during hospitalization, in a tertiary pediatric hospital. Data were collected through focus groups, and analyzed using a grounded theory methodology with NVivo Software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 parents, 7 cultural mediators and 68 healthcare providers participated in 16 focus groups. Two main categories were identified: (1) Parents navigating the uncertainty of the escalation system to get a response; (2) Healthcare providers balancing parents' concerns, their own situation awareness, escalation processes and team relations. We developed a Grounded theory called 'Parents Supporting Timely Escalation Processes' (P-STEP). By monitoring their children, parents identify early signs of deterioration and advocate for escalation. Reasons for concern are their child's behaviour, communication failure and admission on an off-service ward. Parents escalate by contacting ward providers, their child's specialist or the most trusted staff and, only selected parents, the Rapid Response Team. Staff escalate parents' concern according to their own situation awareness, parent evaluation and ward escalation practices. Parent's emotions and trust are influenced by the timeliness and type of staff response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While some parents effectively advocate for their child, others face obstacles due to unclear and lack of formal care escalation systems. Understanding how parents escalate care and healthcare providers respond is essential to identify facilitators, barriers, key stakeholders, and implement a formal system for parent-initiated escalation of care.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>Integrating parents into processes of escalation and rapid response systems could optimise early recognition and improve responsiveness in paediatric deterioration.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The study adheres to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Parents and HCPs participated as interview respondents.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Explore the care escalation process initiated by parents concerned about their hospitalised child's deterioration and healthcare providers' response to parental concerns.
Design: A qualitative study using Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory.
Methods: Participants included healthcare providers, cultural mediators and parents of children hospitalized for ≥ 3 days, who had experienced previous urgent intensive care admission or parental concern during hospitalization, in a tertiary pediatric hospital. Data were collected through focus groups, and analyzed using a grounded theory methodology with NVivo Software.
Results: A total of 13 parents, 7 cultural mediators and 68 healthcare providers participated in 16 focus groups. Two main categories were identified: (1) Parents navigating the uncertainty of the escalation system to get a response; (2) Healthcare providers balancing parents' concerns, their own situation awareness, escalation processes and team relations. We developed a Grounded theory called 'Parents Supporting Timely Escalation Processes' (P-STEP). By monitoring their children, parents identify early signs of deterioration and advocate for escalation. Reasons for concern are their child's behaviour, communication failure and admission on an off-service ward. Parents escalate by contacting ward providers, their child's specialist or the most trusted staff and, only selected parents, the Rapid Response Team. Staff escalate parents' concern according to their own situation awareness, parent evaluation and ward escalation practices. Parent's emotions and trust are influenced by the timeliness and type of staff response.
Conclusion: While some parents effectively advocate for their child, others face obstacles due to unclear and lack of formal care escalation systems. Understanding how parents escalate care and healthcare providers respond is essential to identify facilitators, barriers, key stakeholders, and implement a formal system for parent-initiated escalation of care.
Implications for the profession and patient care: Integrating parents into processes of escalation and rapid response systems could optimise early recognition and improve responsiveness in paediatric deterioration.
Reporting method: The study adheres to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines.
Patient or public contribution: Parents and HCPs participated as interview respondents.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice.
JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.