Long-Term Prognostic Outcomes of Right Hemicolectomy and Extended Right Hemicolectomy Performed for Hepatic Flexura and Proximal Transverse Colon Tumors.
Hilmi Yazici, Ahmet Cem Esmer, Sena Altunsu, Barış Dağdemir, Aysenur Yildiz, Sevket Cumhur Yegen
{"title":"Long-Term Prognostic Outcomes of Right Hemicolectomy and Extended Right Hemicolectomy Performed for Hepatic Flexura and Proximal Transverse Colon Tumors.","authors":"Hilmi Yazici, Ahmet Cem Esmer, Sena Altunsu, Barış Dağdemir, Aysenur Yildiz, Sevket Cumhur Yegen","doi":"10.1177/10732748251376793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThis retrospective study compares the outcomes of right hemicolectomy (RHC) and extended right hemicolectomy (ERHC) in patients with hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon tumors.MethodsData from 85 patients who underwent surgery for colonic adenocarcinoma between January 2015 and December 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who had hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon tumors were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into two groups: RHC and ERHC. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), with secondary outcomes including postoperative complications and pathological data.ResultsThe RHC group comprised 46 patients, while the EHRC group had 39 patients. The study found no significant difference in 5-year OS (77% RHC vs 69% ERHC, <i>P</i> = 0.135) or 5-year DFS (87% RHC vs 81% ERHC, <i>P</i> = 0.388) between the two groups. Although the ERHC group had a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (27 vs 22, <i>P</i> = 0.022), this did not correlate with improved survival outcomes. Tumor localization was identified as a significant factor influencing OS, with hepatic flexure tumors showing better survival compared to proximal transverse colon tumors. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding postoperative complications.ConclusionOur study suggests that while ERHC leads to a higher lymph node yield, it does not significantly improve survival outcomes compared to RHC in patients with hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon tumors. Further research is needed to optimize surgical strategies and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"32 ","pages":"10732748251376793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748251376793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionThis retrospective study compares the outcomes of right hemicolectomy (RHC) and extended right hemicolectomy (ERHC) in patients with hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon tumors.MethodsData from 85 patients who underwent surgery for colonic adenocarcinoma between January 2015 and December 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who had hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon tumors were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into two groups: RHC and ERHC. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), with secondary outcomes including postoperative complications and pathological data.ResultsThe RHC group comprised 46 patients, while the EHRC group had 39 patients. The study found no significant difference in 5-year OS (77% RHC vs 69% ERHC, P = 0.135) or 5-year DFS (87% RHC vs 81% ERHC, P = 0.388) between the two groups. Although the ERHC group had a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (27 vs 22, P = 0.022), this did not correlate with improved survival outcomes. Tumor localization was identified as a significant factor influencing OS, with hepatic flexure tumors showing better survival compared to proximal transverse colon tumors. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding postoperative complications.ConclusionOur study suggests that while ERHC leads to a higher lymph node yield, it does not significantly improve survival outcomes compared to RHC in patients with hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon tumors. Further research is needed to optimize surgical strategies and improve patient outcomes.
本回顾性研究比较了右半结肠切除术(RHC)和扩大右半结肠切除术(ERHC)治疗肝屈曲和近端横结肠肿瘤的疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2023年12月85例结肠腺癌手术患者的资料。有肝屈曲和近端横结肠肿瘤的患者也被纳入分析。患者分为RHC组和ERHC组。主要终点是总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS),次要终点包括术后并发症和病理数据。结果RHC组46例,EHRC组39例。研究发现两组间5年OS (77% RHC vs 69% ERHC, P = 0.135)或5年DFS (87% RHC vs 81% ERHC, P = 0.388)无显著差异。虽然ERHC组有更多的淋巴结(27 vs 22, P = 0.022),但这与生存结果的改善无关。肿瘤定位被认为是影响OS的重要因素,与近端横结肠肿瘤相比,肝屈曲肿瘤的生存率更高。两组术后并发症无明显差异。结论我们的研究表明,虽然ERHC导致更高的淋巴结产量,但与RHC相比,ERHC并未显著改善肝屈曲和近端横结肠肿瘤患者的生存结果。需要进一步的研究来优化手术策略和改善患者的预后。
期刊介绍:
Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.