Stressors Disclosed on Reddit by Caregivers of Older Adults and Social Support Received: Content Analysis.

IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI:10.2196/71452
Nova Mengxia Huang, Bryan Timothy, Shirley S Ho
{"title":"Stressors Disclosed on Reddit by Caregivers of Older Adults and Social Support Received: Content Analysis.","authors":"Nova Mengxia Huang, Bryan Timothy, Shirley S Ho","doi":"10.2196/71452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Informal caregiving of an older adult can be a stressful experience. Anonymous online communities, such as Reddit, provide caregivers with an avenue to disclose their stressors and seek support. However, how caregivers disclose their stressors and the effectiveness of these disclosures in eliciting desired social support remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Guided by the stress process model and optimal matching theory, this study examined stressors disclosed by informal caregivers on Reddit and the types of social support they received in response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quantitative content analysis of posts and comments in 3 subreddits for informal caregivers of older adults. We identified specific stressors disclosed in the posts, analyzed their co-occurrence, and examined the relationship between these stressors and the presence of different types of social support in corresponding comments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 737 posts and 3446 comments from 3 subreddits. In the posts, caregivers frequently disclosed care recipients' functional problems (500/737, 67.8%), caregiving relationship strain (279/737, 37.9%), care recipients' emotional problems (195/737, 26.4%), and a scarcity of health and social resources (98/737, 13.3%). Care recipients' functional problems often co-occurred with caregiving relationship strain (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub>=37.2; P<.001) and with care recipients' emotional problems (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub>=49.0; P<.001). Care recipients' emotional problems also often co-occurred with caregiving relationship strain (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub>=87.2; P<.001). Caregiving activity issues (odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.06-2.89; P=.03) and social role conflict (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.14-2.36; P=.008) were positively associated with informational support received in comments, while care recipients' functional problems (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.32-2.08; P<.001) were positively associated with emotional support. Disclosing role overload (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.03-3.36; P=.04) and social role conflict (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.27-2.77; P=.002) increased the chance of receiving esteem support, while disclosing social restriction (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.03-5.60; P=.002) increased the likelihood of receiving network support. In addition, we found that nearly no tangible support (3/3446, 0.09%) was provided in response to self-disclosed stressors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregivers frequently disclosed primary and secondary stressors as well as stressors from the social environment, with various primary stressors usually co-occurring in Reddit posts. These stressors varied in their effectiveness in eliciting different types of social support in comments. Managers and moderators of online communities, such as subreddits, are expected to encourage caregivers' sharing of stressors and promote the exchange of social support with their peers. Health professionals and social workers should develop targeted support interventions to meet the needs of informal caregivers of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e71452"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/71452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Informal caregiving of an older adult can be a stressful experience. Anonymous online communities, such as Reddit, provide caregivers with an avenue to disclose their stressors and seek support. However, how caregivers disclose their stressors and the effectiveness of these disclosures in eliciting desired social support remain unclear.

Objective: Guided by the stress process model and optimal matching theory, this study examined stressors disclosed by informal caregivers on Reddit and the types of social support they received in response.

Methods: We conducted a quantitative content analysis of posts and comments in 3 subreddits for informal caregivers of older adults. We identified specific stressors disclosed in the posts, analyzed their co-occurrence, and examined the relationship between these stressors and the presence of different types of social support in corresponding comments.

Results: We collected 737 posts and 3446 comments from 3 subreddits. In the posts, caregivers frequently disclosed care recipients' functional problems (500/737, 67.8%), caregiving relationship strain (279/737, 37.9%), care recipients' emotional problems (195/737, 26.4%), and a scarcity of health and social resources (98/737, 13.3%). Care recipients' functional problems often co-occurred with caregiving relationship strain (χ21=37.2; P<.001) and with care recipients' emotional problems (χ21=49.0; P<.001). Care recipients' emotional problems also often co-occurred with caregiving relationship strain (χ21=87.2; P<.001). Caregiving activity issues (odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.06-2.89; P=.03) and social role conflict (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.14-2.36; P=.008) were positively associated with informational support received in comments, while care recipients' functional problems (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.32-2.08; P<.001) were positively associated with emotional support. Disclosing role overload (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.03-3.36; P=.04) and social role conflict (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.27-2.77; P=.002) increased the chance of receiving esteem support, while disclosing social restriction (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.03-5.60; P=.002) increased the likelihood of receiving network support. In addition, we found that nearly no tangible support (3/3446, 0.09%) was provided in response to self-disclosed stressors.

Conclusions: Caregivers frequently disclosed primary and secondary stressors as well as stressors from the social environment, with various primary stressors usually co-occurring in Reddit posts. These stressors varied in their effectiveness in eliciting different types of social support in comments. Managers and moderators of online communities, such as subreddits, are expected to encourage caregivers' sharing of stressors and promote the exchange of social support with their peers. Health professionals and social workers should develop targeted support interventions to meet the needs of informal caregivers of older adults.

老年人照顾者在Reddit上披露的压力源与获得的社会支持:内容分析。
背景:对老年人的非正式照顾可能是一种有压力的经历。Reddit等匿名在线社区为护理人员提供了一个披露压力源和寻求支持的渠道。然而,照顾者如何披露他们的压力源,以及这些披露在引发期望的社会支持方面的有效性仍不清楚。目的:在压力过程模型和最优匹配理论的指导下,研究非正式看护者在Reddit上披露的压力源及其所获得的社会支持类型。方法:我们对老年人非正式照顾者的3个子版块的帖子和评论进行了定量内容分析。我们确定了帖子中披露的特定压力源,分析了它们的共现性,并考察了这些压力源与相应评论中不同类型社会支持的存在之间的关系。结果:我们从3个子reddit上收集了737篇文章和3446条评论。在这些帖子中,照顾者经常披露被照顾者的功能问题(500/737,67.8%),照顾关系紧张(279/737,37.9%),被照顾者的情绪问题(195/737,26.4%),以及健康和社会资源的缺乏(98/737,13.3%)。被照顾者的功能问题常与照顾关系紧张共存(χ21=37.2; P21=49.0; P21=87.2; p)结论:照顾者频繁披露主次压力源以及来自社会环境的压力源,各种主次压力源常同时出现在Reddit帖子中。这些压力源在诱导评论中不同类型的社会支持方面的效果各不相同。在线社区(如subreddits)的管理者和版主应该鼓励照顾者分享压力源,并促进与同伴之间的社会支持交换。保健专业人员和社会工作者应制定有针对性的支助干预措施,以满足老年人非正式照料者的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信