Levetiracetam Dosing Optimization in Neurocritical Care Population: Neuro-ARC Study.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maged Kharouba, Aaron M Cook, Melissa L Thompson Bastin, Demetrios J Kutsogiannis, Sherif Hanafy Mahmoud
{"title":"Levetiracetam Dosing Optimization in Neurocritical Care Population: Neuro-ARC Study.","authors":"Maged Kharouba, Aaron M Cook, Melissa L Thompson Bastin, Demetrios J Kutsogiannis, Sherif Hanafy Mahmoud","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02347-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Levetiracetam, a first-line antiseizure medication, is primarily eliminated through the kidneys, with approximately 66% renal elimination. Consequently, its pharmacokinetics are significantly influenced by kidney function. Augmented renal clearance (ARC), a condition characterized by renal hyperfiltration, is frequently observed in critical care settings and can profoundly impact the disposition of renally eliminated drugs such as levetiracetam. Our objectives were to characterize levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in neurocritical care patients, identify covariates significantly influencing drug clearance, and provide clinicians with optimal dosage recommendations in those with and without ARC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study involving patients admitted to the participating centers with life-threatening neurological illnesses. Each participant had up to four plasma samples collected, and the samples were analyzed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. The creatinine clearance (CL<sub>CR</sub>) of enrolled participants was measured using the 8-h urine collection method (measured  CL<sub>CR</sub> [mCL<sub>CR</sub>]). Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using Monolix software. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to explore various dosage strategies and to suggest optimal levetiracetam regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 50 patients, with 35 patients (70%) experiencing ARC. Trough levetiracetam levels were significantly lower in the ARC group compared with the no-ARC group (median [interquartile range] 4.4 [11.5] vs. 11.8 [19] mg/L, p value = 0.039, respectively). Population pharmacokinetic modeling showed levetiracetam clearance at 4.6 ± 2.97 L/h and volume of distribution at 0.56 ± 0.63 L/kg, following a one-compartment model. The mCL<sub>CR</sub> significantly affected levetiracetam clearance. Simulations indicated that an initial 500 mg twice daily (BID) dosage is insufficient. Patients with mCL<sub>CR</sub> ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, including patients with ARC, may need at least 1500 mg BID, whereas those with mCL<sub>CR</sub> 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> may require an initial dosage of 1250 mg BID.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Augmented renal clearance significantly impacts the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam by enhancing clearance. Dosing simulations revealed the inadequacy of the initial 500 mg BID regimen, indicating a minimum dosage of 1500 mg BID is necessary for patients experiencing ARC to achieve reference range concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02347-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Levetiracetam, a first-line antiseizure medication, is primarily eliminated through the kidneys, with approximately 66% renal elimination. Consequently, its pharmacokinetics are significantly influenced by kidney function. Augmented renal clearance (ARC), a condition characterized by renal hyperfiltration, is frequently observed in critical care settings and can profoundly impact the disposition of renally eliminated drugs such as levetiracetam. Our objectives were to characterize levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in neurocritical care patients, identify covariates significantly influencing drug clearance, and provide clinicians with optimal dosage recommendations in those with and without ARC.

Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study involving patients admitted to the participating centers with life-threatening neurological illnesses. Each participant had up to four plasma samples collected, and the samples were analyzed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. The creatinine clearance (CLCR) of enrolled participants was measured using the 8-h urine collection method (measured  CLCR [mCLCR]). Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using Monolix software. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to explore various dosage strategies and to suggest optimal levetiracetam regimens.

Results: Our study included 50 patients, with 35 patients (70%) experiencing ARC. Trough levetiracetam levels were significantly lower in the ARC group compared with the no-ARC group (median [interquartile range] 4.4 [11.5] vs. 11.8 [19] mg/L, p value = 0.039, respectively). Population pharmacokinetic modeling showed levetiracetam clearance at 4.6 ± 2.97 L/h and volume of distribution at 0.56 ± 0.63 L/kg, following a one-compartment model. The mCLCR significantly affected levetiracetam clearance. Simulations indicated that an initial 500 mg twice daily (BID) dosage is insufficient. Patients with mCLCR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, including patients with ARC, may need at least 1500 mg BID, whereas those with mCLCR 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2 may require an initial dosage of 1250 mg BID.

Conclusions: Augmented renal clearance significantly impacts the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam by enhancing clearance. Dosing simulations revealed the inadequacy of the initial 500 mg BID regimen, indicating a minimum dosage of 1500 mg BID is necessary for patients experiencing ARC to achieve reference range concentrations.

神经危重症患者左乙拉西坦剂量优化:neuroarc研究。
背景:左乙拉西坦是一线抗癫痫药物,主要通过肾脏消除,约66%的肾脏消除。因此,其药代动力学受到肾功能的显著影响。增强肾清除率(ARC)是一种以肾超滤为特征的疾病,在重症监护环境中经常观察到,并可能深刻影响肾脏消除药物(如左乙拉西坦)的处置。我们的目的是表征神经危重症患者的左乙西坦药代动力学,确定显著影响药物清除率的协变量,并为临床医生提供有和无ARC患者的最佳剂量建议。方法:这是一项多中心,前瞻性,观察性研究,涉及到参与中心的危及生命的神经系统疾病患者。每个参与者最多收集了四个血浆样本,并使用经过验证的高效液相色谱法对样本进行分析。采用8小时尿液收集法测量入选受试者的肌酐清除率(CLCR测定[mCLCR])。采用Monolix软件进行群体药代动力学建模。进行蒙特卡罗模拟以探索各种剂量策略并建议最佳的左乙拉西坦方案。结果:我们的研究纳入了50例患者,其中35例(70%)经历了ARC。与非ARC组相比,ARC组的左乙乙胺谷水平显著降低(中位数[四分位数间距]4.4 [11.5]vs. 11.8 [19] mg/L, p值分别为0.039)。群体药代动力学模型显示左乙拉西坦清除率为4.6±2.97 L/h,分布体积为0.56±0.63 L/kg,采用单室模型。mccr显著影响左乙拉西坦的清除率。模拟表明,最初的500毫克每日两次(BID)剂量是不够的。mCLCR≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2的患者,包括ARC患者,可能需要至少1500 mg BID,而mCLCR 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2的患者可能需要1250 mg BID的初始剂量。结论:肾脏清除率的增强通过增强清除率显著影响左乙拉西坦的药代动力学。剂量模拟显示初始500mg BID方案的不足,表明最低剂量1500mg BID对于发生ARC的患者达到参考浓度范围是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信