The Survival Rate and Its Influencing Factors of Modular Endoprosthetic Replacement With Uncemented Stem for the Proximal Femur After Primary Tumor Resection.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-04 DOI:10.1111/os.70146
Zhuangzhuang Li, Yi Luo, Yitian Wang, Taojun Gong, Xuanhong He, Yong Zhou, Minxun Lu, Li Min, Chongqi Tu
{"title":"The Survival Rate and Its Influencing Factors of Modular Endoprosthetic Replacement With Uncemented Stem for the Proximal Femur After Primary Tumor Resection.","authors":"Zhuangzhuang Li, Yi Luo, Yitian Wang, Taojun Gong, Xuanhong He, Yong Zhou, Minxun Lu, Li Min, Chongqi Tu","doi":"10.1111/os.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Durable and biologically integrated fixation is critical for long-term implant survival in patients with primary bone tumors. However, limited evidence exists regarding the long-term outcomes of uncemented stem designs in this population. Specifically, we investigated: (1) the long-term patient and implant survivorship rates; (2) the influence of factors such as resection length and patient age on implant survival; and (3) the incidence and types of complications, particularly those requiring implant removal or revision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 76 patients (49 males, 27 females; mean age 41 years, range 14-78 years) who underwent proximal femoral replacement with a modular uncemented endoprosthesis between 2015 and 2022. The mean follow-up was 63.4 months (median: 60.5 months; range: 12-104 months). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, while complications were classified based on the Henderson et al. system. Survivorship analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5-year patient survival rate was 88.0%, and the 5-year implant survival rate was 90.4%. The mean MSTS score at final follow-up was 25.6 (range 16-30), with 87.7% of patients achieving good to excellent functional outcomes. Younger patients (< 30 years) exhibited poorer implant survival, while resection length did not significantly impact outcomes. Complications occurred in 18.4% of cases, categorized into type 1 (soft tissue-related, n = 3), type 2 (aseptic loosening, n = 2), type 3 (structural failure, n = 0), type 4 (infection, n = 3), type 5 (tumor recurrence, n = 3), and three cases of acetabular failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modular uncemented endoprostheses for proximal femoral replacement demonstrated promising survivorship and functional outcomes in patients with primary bone tumors. The low rate of aseptic loosening highlights the benefits of uncemented stem designs. However, younger age remains a risk factor for reduced implant longevity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2869-2878"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Durable and biologically integrated fixation is critical for long-term implant survival in patients with primary bone tumors. However, limited evidence exists regarding the long-term outcomes of uncemented stem designs in this population. Specifically, we investigated: (1) the long-term patient and implant survivorship rates; (2) the influence of factors such as resection length and patient age on implant survival; and (3) the incidence and types of complications, particularly those requiring implant removal or revision.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 76 patients (49 males, 27 females; mean age 41 years, range 14-78 years) who underwent proximal femoral replacement with a modular uncemented endoprosthesis between 2015 and 2022. The mean follow-up was 63.4 months (median: 60.5 months; range: 12-104 months). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, while complications were classified based on the Henderson et al. system. Survivorship analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Results: The 5-year patient survival rate was 88.0%, and the 5-year implant survival rate was 90.4%. The mean MSTS score at final follow-up was 25.6 (range 16-30), with 87.7% of patients achieving good to excellent functional outcomes. Younger patients (< 30 years) exhibited poorer implant survival, while resection length did not significantly impact outcomes. Complications occurred in 18.4% of cases, categorized into type 1 (soft tissue-related, n = 3), type 2 (aseptic loosening, n = 2), type 3 (structural failure, n = 0), type 4 (infection, n = 3), type 5 (tumor recurrence, n = 3), and three cases of acetabular failure.

Conclusions: Modular uncemented endoprostheses for proximal femoral replacement demonstrated promising survivorship and functional outcomes in patients with primary bone tumors. The low rate of aseptic loosening highlights the benefits of uncemented stem designs. However, younger age remains a risk factor for reduced implant longevity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

原发肿瘤切除后股骨近端非骨水泥假体模块置换术的生存率及其影响因素。
目的:持久和生物一体化的固定是原发性骨肿瘤患者种植体长期存活的关键。然而,在这一人群中,关于非骨水泥支架设计的长期结果的证据有限。具体来说,我们调查了:(1)患者和种植体的长期存活率;(2)切除长度、患者年龄等因素对种植体存活的影响;(3)并发症的发生率和类型,特别是需要移除或修复的并发症。方法:我们回顾性分析了2015年至2022年间接受模块化非骨水泥假体股骨近端置换术的76例患者(男性49例,女性27例;平均年龄41岁,范围14-78岁)。平均随访63.4个月(中位:60.5个月,范围:12-104个月)。使用肌肉骨骼肿瘤协会(MSTS)评分评估功能结果,而根据Henderson等人的系统对并发症进行分类。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier方法。结果:患者5年生存率为88.0%,种植体5年生存率为90.4%。最终随访时的平均MSTS评分为25.6(范围16-30),87.7%的患者获得良好至优异的功能预后。结论:模块化非骨水泥假体股骨近端置换术在原发性骨肿瘤患者中具有良好的生存和功能预后。低无菌松动率突出了非胶结阀杆设计的优点。然而,年轻仍然是降低种植体寿命的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信