Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate in Diagnosing Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion and Adrenal Insufficiency.

IF 3.1 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of the Endocrine Society Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1210/jendso/bvaf136
Jasmine Saini, Bahaa Salama, Kai Yu, Shireen R Chacko, Ashley J Han, Camila Villavicencio Torres, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Irina Bancos
{"title":"Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate in Diagnosing Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion and Adrenal Insufficiency.","authors":"Jasmine Saini, Bahaa Salama, Kai Yu, Shireen R Chacko, Ashley J Han, Camila Villavicencio Torres, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Irina Bancos","doi":"10.1210/jendso/bvaf136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Data on diagnostic accuracy of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) for mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) and adrenal insufficiency (AI) are discrepant.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies assessing the accuracy of DHEA-S in diagnosing MACS or AI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From inception to January 8, 2024, we searched databases for original studies of at least 20 participants with MACS or AI. MACS was defined as postdexamethasone cortisol greater than 1.8 mcg/dL or postsurgical hypocortisolism. AI was defined by abnormal dynamic testing. QUADAS-2 was used to assess the risk of bias. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis was used to generate pooled diagnostic accuracy estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies on DHEA-S accuracy in diagnosing MACS (574 patients with MACS, 830 referent individuals), and 2 studies on DHEA-S accuracy in diagnosing AI (52 patients with AI, 59 referent individuals) were included. A meta-analysis of studies using DHEA-S cutoff between 60 and 70 mcg/dL to diagnose MACS demonstrated a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI, 64%-93%) and a specificity of 82% (95% CI, 74%-88%). In the 2 studies evaluating DHEA-S in diagnosing AI, the reference standard was a 1-mcg cosyntropin stimulation test. The sensitivity of DHEA-S for diagnosing AI ranged from 70.3% to 86.7%, and the specificity was 87.1%. Most studies were at a moderate risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on limited heterogeneous evidence, measurement of DHEA-S provides additional value in diagnosing MACS, as well as AI.</p>","PeriodicalId":17334,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","volume":"9 9","pages":"bvaf136"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Data on diagnostic accuracy of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) for mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) and adrenal insufficiency (AI) are discrepant.

Objective: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies assessing the accuracy of DHEA-S in diagnosing MACS or AI.

Methods: From inception to January 8, 2024, we searched databases for original studies of at least 20 participants with MACS or AI. MACS was defined as postdexamethasone cortisol greater than 1.8 mcg/dL or postsurgical hypocortisolism. AI was defined by abnormal dynamic testing. QUADAS-2 was used to assess the risk of bias. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis was used to generate pooled diagnostic accuracy estimates.

Results: Seven studies on DHEA-S accuracy in diagnosing MACS (574 patients with MACS, 830 referent individuals), and 2 studies on DHEA-S accuracy in diagnosing AI (52 patients with AI, 59 referent individuals) were included. A meta-analysis of studies using DHEA-S cutoff between 60 and 70 mcg/dL to diagnose MACS demonstrated a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI, 64%-93%) and a specificity of 82% (95% CI, 74%-88%). In the 2 studies evaluating DHEA-S in diagnosing AI, the reference standard was a 1-mcg cosyntropin stimulation test. The sensitivity of DHEA-S for diagnosing AI ranged from 70.3% to 86.7%, and the specificity was 87.1%. Most studies were at a moderate risk of bias.

Conclusion: Based on limited heterogeneous evidence, measurement of DHEA-S provides additional value in diagnosing MACS, as well as AI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

硫酸脱氢表雄酮诊断轻度自主皮质醇分泌和肾上腺功能不全。
背景:关于硫酸脱氢表雄酮(DHEA-S)对轻度自主皮质醇分泌(MACS)和肾上腺功能不全(AI)的诊断准确性数据存在差异。目的:我们对已发表的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估DHEA-S诊断MACS或AI的准确性。方法:从成立到2024年1月8日,我们检索了数据库中至少20名MACS或AI参与者的原始研究。MACS定义为地塞米松后皮质醇高于1.8微克/分升或术后皮质醇过低。AI是通过异常动态测试来定义的。采用QUADAS-2评估偏倚风险。双变量随机效应荟萃分析用于产生汇总诊断准确性估计。结果:共纳入7项关于DHEA-S诊断MACS准确性的研究(574例MACS患者,830例参考个体),2项关于DHEA-S诊断AI准确性的研究(52例AI患者,59例参考个体)。一项荟萃分析显示,使用60 - 70 mcg/dL之间的DHEA-S临界值诊断MACS的敏感性为82% (95% CI, 64%-93%),特异性为82% (95% CI, 74%-88%)。在评价DHEA-S诊断AI的2项研究中,参考标准为1 mcg共syntropin刺激试验。DHEA-S诊断AI的敏感性为70.3% ~ 86.7%,特异性为87.1%。大多数研究存在中等偏倚风险。结论:基于有限的异质性证据,DHEA-S的测量对MACS和AI的诊断提供了额外的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Journal of the Endocrine Society Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信