Opioid prescribing in post-operative orthopedic patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation.

Q3 Medicine
Lucy Morison, Vincent Chan, Tim Tran
{"title":"Opioid prescribing in post-operative orthopedic patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation.","authors":"Lucy Morison, Vincent Chan, Tim Tran","doi":"10.5055/jom.0941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid prescribing to post-operative patients in the acute hospital setting is well described; however, little is known about use of opioids in inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) settings. Understanding how opioids are prescribed across all inpatient settings is important to optimize opioid stewardship. The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of post-operative orthopedic patients prescribed opioids and prescribing patterns on discharge from an IPR ward.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center retrospective audit.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary metropolitan hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients who underwent an orthopedic surgical procedure between January and July 2020 and were subsequently transferred to an IPR center under the same health service.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Opioid prescribing data were obtained at three time points: on admission to the acute hospital, at the time of transfer from the acute hospital to IPR, and at the time of discharge from IPR. Doses were reported in oxycodone equivalent doses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 117 patients who were included in the audit (median age 84 years, median length of hospital stay 23 days), 115 (98 percent) were prescribed an opioid at the time of discharge from the acute hospital to IPR, and 69 patients (59 percent) were discharged from IPR with a prescription for an opioid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant proportion of patients admitted to IPR were discharged with a prescription for an opioid. Further research is required to determine the appropriateness of continued opioid use in these patients, and ways to reduce the exposure of patients to opioids during and following IPR should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"21 4","pages":"303-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioid prescribing to post-operative patients in the acute hospital setting is well described; however, little is known about use of opioids in inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) settings. Understanding how opioids are prescribed across all inpatient settings is important to optimize opioid stewardship. The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of post-operative orthopedic patients prescribed opioids and prescribing patterns on discharge from an IPR ward.

Design: Single-center retrospective audit.

Setting: Tertiary metropolitan hospital.

Patients: Patients who underwent an orthopedic surgical procedure between January and July 2020 and were subsequently transferred to an IPR center under the same health service.

Main outcome measures: Opioid prescribing data were obtained at three time points: on admission to the acute hospital, at the time of transfer from the acute hospital to IPR, and at the time of discharge from IPR. Doses were reported in oxycodone equivalent doses.

Results: Of the 117 patients who were included in the audit (median age 84 years, median length of hospital stay 23 days), 115 (98 percent) were prescribed an opioid at the time of discharge from the acute hospital to IPR, and 69 patients (59 percent) were discharged from IPR with a prescription for an opioid.

Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients admitted to IPR were discharged with a prescription for an opioid. Further research is required to determine the appropriateness of continued opioid use in these patients, and ways to reduce the exposure of patients to opioids during and following IPR should be explored.

骨科术后住院康复患者的阿片类药物处方。
背景:阿片类药物处方的术后患者在急性医院设置很好地描述;然而,关于阿片类药物在住院康复(IPR)环境中的使用知之甚少。了解阿片类药物如何在所有住院环境中处方对于优化阿片类药物管理非常重要。本研究的目的是确定手术后骨科患者在IPR病房出院时处方阿片类药物的百分比和处方模式。设计:单中心回顾性审核。单位:三级城市医院。患者:在2020年1月至7月期间接受整形外科手术并随后转移到同一卫生服务机构下的知识产权中心的患者。主要结果测量:在三个时间点获得阿片类药物处方数据:入住急性医院时,从急性医院转到知识产权医院时,以及从知识产权医院出院时。剂量报告为氧可酮等量剂量。结果:纳入审计的117例患者(中位年龄84岁,中位住院时间23天)中,115例(98%)在从急症医院出院到IPR时处方阿片类药物,69例(59%)患者出院时处方阿片类药物。结论:在IPR住院的患者中,有相当大比例的患者出院时使用了阿片类药物处方。需要进一步的研究来确定这些患者继续使用阿片类药物的适宜性,并应探索减少患者在知识产权期间和之后接触阿片类药物的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信