Development and Evaluation of Sleep Disorder Decision Aids for Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Adam R Kinney, Lisa A Brenner, Morgan Nance, Audrey D Cobb, Jeri E Forster, Christi S Ulmer, Risa Nakase-Richardson, Constance H Fung, Nazanin H Bahraini
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of Sleep Disorder Decision Aids for Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Adam R Kinney, Lisa A Brenner, Morgan Nance, Audrey D Cobb, Jeri E Forster, Christi S Ulmer, Risa Nakase-Richardson, Constance H Fung, Nazanin H Bahraini","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>First, to summarize the design of novel decision aid prototypes aimed at facilitating shared decision-making for Veterans with co-morbid mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and sleep disorders (insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea [OSA]) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Polytrauma/TBI System of Care (PSC). Second, to elicit feedback regarding usability, acceptability, and feasibility of prototypes to inform future implementation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Nationwide VHA PSC sites.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Clinicians included VHA providers involved in the management of mTBI and/or sleep disorders in the VHA PSC (n = 7). Veterans included those with a clinician-confirmed mTBI who received care for insomnia disorder and OSA within the past year (n = 5).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Convergent parallel mixed methods.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Semi-structured interview guides; System Usability Scale; Ottawa Decision Aid Acceptability Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants found the decision aid prototypes easy to use, highlighting its accessibility and features enabling an easy comparison of treatments. However, participants recommended changes to simplify and improve the design. Decision aids were seen as acceptable, providing essential information for Veterans with mTBI and facilitating shared decision-making among providers, Veterans, and other decision partners (eg, spouse). Removal of non-essential content was recommended to increase acceptability. Decision aids were considered feasible to implement, though extending the decision-making process beyond the initial encounter and accounting for time constraints were recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight that the decision aids are easy-to-use, feasible to implement, and capable of improving Veteran-centered management of sleep disorders among those with mTBI. Nonetheless, clinicians and Veterans offered recommendations for changes that can improve the utility of the decision aids and facilitate their seamless integration into routine care for Veterans with co-morbid mTBI and sleep disorders. Findings lay the foundation for efforts aimed at implementing the decision aids into routine care for sleep disorders in the VHA PSC, aligning care decisions with Veteran preferences and improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: First, to summarize the design of novel decision aid prototypes aimed at facilitating shared decision-making for Veterans with co-morbid mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and sleep disorders (insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea [OSA]) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Polytrauma/TBI System of Care (PSC). Second, to elicit feedback regarding usability, acceptability, and feasibility of prototypes to inform future implementation.

Setting: Nationwide VHA PSC sites.

Participants: Clinicians included VHA providers involved in the management of mTBI and/or sleep disorders in the VHA PSC (n = 7). Veterans included those with a clinician-confirmed mTBI who received care for insomnia disorder and OSA within the past year (n = 5).

Design: Convergent parallel mixed methods.

Main measures: Semi-structured interview guides; System Usability Scale; Ottawa Decision Aid Acceptability Scale.

Results: Participants found the decision aid prototypes easy to use, highlighting its accessibility and features enabling an easy comparison of treatments. However, participants recommended changes to simplify and improve the design. Decision aids were seen as acceptable, providing essential information for Veterans with mTBI and facilitating shared decision-making among providers, Veterans, and other decision partners (eg, spouse). Removal of non-essential content was recommended to increase acceptability. Decision aids were considered feasible to implement, though extending the decision-making process beyond the initial encounter and accounting for time constraints were recommended.

Conclusions: Findings highlight that the decision aids are easy-to-use, feasible to implement, and capable of improving Veteran-centered management of sleep disorders among those with mTBI. Nonetheless, clinicians and Veterans offered recommendations for changes that can improve the utility of the decision aids and facilitate their seamless integration into routine care for Veterans with co-morbid mTBI and sleep disorders. Findings lay the foundation for efforts aimed at implementing the decision aids into routine care for sleep disorders in the VHA PSC, aligning care decisions with Veteran preferences and improving outcomes.

轻度创伤性脑损伤退伍军人睡眠障碍决策辅助工具的开发与评价。
目的:首先,总结旨在促进退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)多重创伤/TBI护理系统(PSC)中伴有轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)和睡眠障碍(失眠、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停[OSA])的退伍军人共同决策的新型决策辅助原型设计。第二,引出关于原型的可用性、可接受性和可行性的反馈,以告知未来的实现。设置:全国VHA PSC站点。参与者:临床医生包括在VHA PSC中参与mTBI和/或睡眠障碍管理的VHA提供者(n = 7)。退伍军人包括那些在过去一年内接受失眠障碍和睡眠呼吸暂停治疗的临床证实的mTBI患者(n = 5)。设计:收敛并行混合方法。主要措施:半结构化面试指南;系统可用性量表;渥太华决策援助可接受性量表。结果:参与者发现决策辅助原型易于使用,突出了其可访问性和功能,使治疗容易比较。然而,参与者建议进行更改以简化和改进设计。决策辅助被认为是可以接受的,为患有mTBI的退伍军人提供必要的信息,并促进提供者、退伍军人和其他决策伙伴(如配偶)之间的共同决策。建议删除不必要的内容以提高可接受性。决策辅助工具被认为是可行的,但建议将决策过程扩展到最初的遭遇之后,并考虑到时间限制。结论:研究结果表明,决策辅助工具易于使用,实施可行,能够改善以退伍军人为中心的mTBI患者睡眠障碍管理。尽管如此,临床医生和退伍军人提出了改进建议,以提高决策辅助工具的效用,并促进其无缝整合到患有mTBI和睡眠障碍的退伍军人的日常护理中。研究结果为在VHA PSC的睡眠障碍常规护理中实施决策辅助奠定了基础,使护理决策与退伍军人的偏好保持一致,并改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信