Individualized opioid tapering in a community interdisciplinary pain management program with flexible care plans: Outcomes, patient retention, and follow-up.

Q3 Medicine
Susan M Ferron, Alfred L Clavel, Georgia E Panopoulos, Grant M Kaper, Sally K Gustafson
{"title":"Individualized opioid tapering in a community interdisciplinary pain management program with flexible care plans: Outcomes, patient retention, and follow-up.","authors":"Susan M Ferron, Alfred L Clavel, Georgia E Panopoulos, Grant M Kaper, Sally K Gustafson","doi":"10.5055/jom.0953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of an outpatient, interdisciplinary pain management (IPM) program offering individualized opioid tapering as part of flexible, patient-specific care plans, in achieving the dual goals of improved management of chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) and substantial reduction of opioid use.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study, comprising a cohort of patients who presented on opioid therapy and a cohort who did not.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community outpatient IPM program.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients presenting between April 1, 2016 and September 15, 2019. From an initial pool of 402 patients, inclusion and exclusion criteria identified 300 patients for analyses.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Engagement in a comprehensive and flexible IPM program with patient-specific care plans that included individualized opioid tapering.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Changes in pain intensity, pain interference, physical therapy (PT) metrics, patient retention, and follow-up of opioid use status at least 3 years after the end of each patient's study episode of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Changes in pain intensity and interference, and PT outcomes reflected notable improvements in pain management, with no significant overall differences between cohorts. During study episodes of care, all patients in the opioid cohort reduced opioid use and two-thirds discontinued opioids; patient retention was 90.9 percent. In follow-up of over 80 percent of the opioid cohort up to an average of 4.5 years, opioid use for CNMP decreased to 15.8 percent of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A flexible, patient-centered IPM program can improve the management of CNMP, substantially reduce opioid use, and maintain a high rate of patient retention. During follow-up, patients further reduced their use of opioids for CNMP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"21 4","pages":"281-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an outpatient, interdisciplinary pain management (IPM) program offering individualized opioid tapering as part of flexible, patient-specific care plans, in achieving the dual goals of improved management of chronic nonmalignant pain (CNMP) and substantial reduction of opioid use.

Design: A retrospective cohort study, comprising a cohort of patients who presented on opioid therapy and a cohort who did not.

Setting: Community outpatient IPM program.

Participants: Patients presenting between April 1, 2016 and September 15, 2019. From an initial pool of 402 patients, inclusion and exclusion criteria identified 300 patients for analyses.

Interventions: Engagement in a comprehensive and flexible IPM program with patient-specific care plans that included individualized opioid tapering.

Main outcome measure(s): Changes in pain intensity, pain interference, physical therapy (PT) metrics, patient retention, and follow-up of opioid use status at least 3 years after the end of each patient's study episode of care.

Results: Changes in pain intensity and interference, and PT outcomes reflected notable improvements in pain management, with no significant overall differences between cohorts. During study episodes of care, all patients in the opioid cohort reduced opioid use and two-thirds discontinued opioids; patient retention was 90.9 percent. In follow-up of over 80 percent of the opioid cohort up to an average of 4.5 years, opioid use for CNMP decreased to 15.8 percent of patients.

Conclusions: A flexible, patient-centered IPM program can improve the management of CNMP, substantially reduce opioid use, and maintain a high rate of patient retention. During follow-up, patients further reduced their use of opioids for CNMP.

灵活护理计划的社区跨学科疼痛管理项目中的个体化阿片类药物减量:结果、患者保留率和随访。
目的:评估门诊、跨学科疼痛管理(IPM)项目的有效性,该项目提供个体化阿片类药物逐渐减少,作为灵活的、针对患者的护理计划的一部分,以实现改善慢性非恶性疼痛(CNMP)管理和大幅减少阿片类药物使用的双重目标。设计:回顾性队列研究,包括一组接受阿片类药物治疗的患者和一组未接受阿片类药物治疗的患者。环境:社区门诊IPM项目。参与者:2016年4月1日至2019年9月15日期间就诊的患者。从402例患者的初始池中,纳入和排除标准确定了300例患者进行分析。干预措施:参与一个全面和灵活的IPM项目,包括个体化阿片类药物逐渐减少的患者具体护理计划。主要结局指标:疼痛强度、疼痛干扰、物理治疗(PT)指标、患者保留率的变化,以及每位患者护理研究结束后至少3年阿片类药物使用状况的随访。结果:疼痛强度和干扰的变化,以及PT结果反映了疼痛管理的显着改善,队列之间没有显着的总体差异。在研究期间,阿片类药物队列中的所有患者都减少了阿片类药物的使用,三分之二的患者停用了阿片类药物;患者保留率为90.9%。在对超过80%的阿片类药物队列的平均4.5年的随访中,阿片类药物用于CNMP的患者减少到15.8%。结论:灵活的、以患者为中心的IPM方案可以改善CNMP的管理,大幅减少阿片类药物的使用,并保持较高的患者保留率。在随访期间,患者进一步减少了阿片类药物在CNMP中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信