Feasibility of implementing an intervention in general practice for deprescribing of glucose-lowering medication in overtreated elderly.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Charlotte Andriessen, Marieke T Blom, Beryl A C E van Hoek, Anna W de Boer, Petra Denig, Ron Herings, Angela de Rooij-Peek, Rob J van Marum, Jacqueline G Hugtenburg, Daniël van Raalte, Liselotte van Bloemendaal, Giel Nijpels, Marjan J Westerman, Rimke C Vos, Petra J M Elders
{"title":"Feasibility of implementing an intervention in general practice for deprescribing of glucose-lowering medication in overtreated elderly.","authors":"Charlotte Andriessen, Marieke T Blom, Beryl A C E van Hoek, Anna W de Boer, Petra Denig, Ron Herings, Angela de Rooij-Peek, Rob J van Marum, Jacqueline G Hugtenburg, Daniël van Raalte, Liselotte van Bloemendaal, Giel Nijpels, Marjan J Westerman, Rimke C Vos, Petra J M Elders","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elderly patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) are frequently overtreated with glucose-lowering medication.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This feasibility study evaluated the implementation of a deprescribing programme (DPP) for general practices, consisting of education, a patient selection tool, practice visits, and an expert support panel, before scaling it in a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quantitative evaluation included the number of patients with T2D eligible for deprescribing using medical records and study progress data. Qualitative evaluation entailed the analysis of minutes made during training, and interviews with health care providers (HCPs). The extended normalization process theory guided analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 10 practices, 55 out of 65 eligible patients were deprescribed glucose-lowering medication, with 22 restarts. Most execution steps were perceived as the practice nurse's responsibility, whereas the general practitioner needed to approve the deprescribing. Practice nurses found the educational training, including peer-to-peer sessions and practice visits, supportive of integrating deprescribing into practice. DPP procedures and tasks not part of the regular care process were not consistently performed. The DPP was adapted to minimize study tasks for HCPs and align study procedures to existing routine procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of a DPP in general practice requires education, practice visits, and alignment of DPP components to regular care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elderly patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) are frequently overtreated with glucose-lowering medication.

Objective: This feasibility study evaluated the implementation of a deprescribing programme (DPP) for general practices, consisting of education, a patient selection tool, practice visits, and an expert support panel, before scaling it in a randomized controlled trial.

Methods: Quantitative evaluation included the number of patients with T2D eligible for deprescribing using medical records and study progress data. Qualitative evaluation entailed the analysis of minutes made during training, and interviews with health care providers (HCPs). The extended normalization process theory guided analysis.

Results: In 10 practices, 55 out of 65 eligible patients were deprescribed glucose-lowering medication, with 22 restarts. Most execution steps were perceived as the practice nurse's responsibility, whereas the general practitioner needed to approve the deprescribing. Practice nurses found the educational training, including peer-to-peer sessions and practice visits, supportive of integrating deprescribing into practice. DPP procedures and tasks not part of the regular care process were not consistently performed. The DPP was adapted to minimize study tasks for HCPs and align study procedures to existing routine procedures.

Conclusion: Implementation of a DPP in general practice requires education, practice visits, and alignment of DPP components to regular care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在全科实践中对过度治疗的老年人降糖药处方实施干预的可行性。
背景:老年2型糖尿病(T2D)患者经常过度使用降糖药物。目的:本可行性研究在随机对照试验前评估了全科实践中处方化规划(DPP)的实施,包括教育、患者选择工具、实践访问和专家支持小组。方法:采用病历资料和研究进展资料对符合处方要求的T2D患者数量进行定量评价。定性评价包括对培训期间的会议记录进行分析,以及对卫生保健提供者(HCPs)进行访谈。扩展归一化过程理论指导了分析。结果:在10个实践中,65例符合条件的患者中有55例被开了降糖药,22例重新开始。大多数执行步骤被认为是执业护士的责任,而全科医生需要批准处方。实习护士发现教育培训,包括点对点会议和实习访问,有助于将处方纳入实践。不属于常规护理程序的DPP程序和任务没有得到一致的执行。对DPP进行了调整,以尽量减少医护人员的研究任务,并使研究程序与现有的常规程序保持一致。结论:在全科实践中实施DPP需要教育,实践访问,并将DPP组成部分与常规护理相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信