A longitudinal qualitative study exploring how workplace factors impact family physicians' provision of spiritual care during comprehensive patient care: implications for burnout prevention and policy.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Brendan Kelley, Qiyi He, Leela Mennillo, Janet Roseman, Gowri Anandarajah
{"title":"A longitudinal qualitative study exploring how workplace factors impact family physicians' provision of spiritual care during comprehensive patient care: implications for burnout prevention and policy.","authors":"Brendan Kelley, Qiyi He, Leela Mennillo, Janet Roseman, Gowri Anandarajah","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family physicians (FPs) endorse the value of spiritual care (SC) as part of comprehensive, patient-centered care. However, a mismatch exists between patients' desire to have spiritual needs addressed and physicians' SC provision. Studies explore physician barriers, but few examine workplace barriers/facilitators. Qualitative and longitudinal studies are rare. The objective is to gain an in-depth understanding of how workplace factors affect FPs' SC provision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a longitudinal, qualitative, and individual interview study; a secondary analysis of a dataset collected over 20 years. All 38 residents in a USA FM residency were invited to participate; the longitudinal study-group (PGY-1 subset) was interviewed four times over 20 years. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews, audio-recorded, and transcribed. Researchers analyzed interviews, using grounded theory, with workplace factors as the central topic of interest. Iterative analysis cycles involved researchers individually coding transcripts followed by group analysis meetings until they reached consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four FPs participated with 13 interviewed longitudinally; 66 interviews analyzed. While diverse in personal importance of spirituality, all FPs endorsed SC as part of whole-person care. Workplace SC facilitators/barriers include: practice setting/patient population; doctor-patient relationships; resources available; workplace demands; and workplace culture. Throughout 20 years, FPs readily identified patients needing SC. Workplaces that lacked SC referral resources or undervalued comprehensive care and/or physician wellness negatively impacted SC provision for patients and physician job satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While FPs value SC provision as part of whole-person care, workplace factors have a profound impact on physicians' SC provision. Misalignment of physician and workplace values could contribute to physician burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family physicians (FPs) endorse the value of spiritual care (SC) as part of comprehensive, patient-centered care. However, a mismatch exists between patients' desire to have spiritual needs addressed and physicians' SC provision. Studies explore physician barriers, but few examine workplace barriers/facilitators. Qualitative and longitudinal studies are rare. The objective is to gain an in-depth understanding of how workplace factors affect FPs' SC provision.

Methods: This was a longitudinal, qualitative, and individual interview study; a secondary analysis of a dataset collected over 20 years. All 38 residents in a USA FM residency were invited to participate; the longitudinal study-group (PGY-1 subset) was interviewed four times over 20 years. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews, audio-recorded, and transcribed. Researchers analyzed interviews, using grounded theory, with workplace factors as the central topic of interest. Iterative analysis cycles involved researchers individually coding transcripts followed by group analysis meetings until they reached consensus.

Results: Thirty-four FPs participated with 13 interviewed longitudinally; 66 interviews analyzed. While diverse in personal importance of spirituality, all FPs endorsed SC as part of whole-person care. Workplace SC facilitators/barriers include: practice setting/patient population; doctor-patient relationships; resources available; workplace demands; and workplace culture. Throughout 20 years, FPs readily identified patients needing SC. Workplaces that lacked SC referral resources or undervalued comprehensive care and/or physician wellness negatively impacted SC provision for patients and physician job satisfaction.

Conclusions: While FPs value SC provision as part of whole-person care, workplace factors have a profound impact on physicians' SC provision. Misalignment of physician and workplace values could contribute to physician burnout.

一项纵向定性研究探讨工作场所因素如何影响家庭医生在综合病人护理中提供精神护理:对倦怠预防和政策的影响。
背景:家庭医生(FPs)认可精神护理(SC)作为全面的,以患者为中心的护理的一部分的价值。然而,患者对精神需求的渴望与医生的SC提供之间存在不匹配。研究探讨了医生的障碍,但很少研究工作场所的障碍/促进因素。定性和纵向研究很少。目的是深入了解工作场所因素如何影响FPs的SC供应。方法:这是一项纵向、定性和个体访谈研究;对20多年来收集的数据集进行的二次分析。美国FM驻地的所有38名居民都被邀请参加;纵向研究组(PGY-1亚组)在20年内接受了4次访谈。数据是通过半结构化访谈、录音和转录收集的。研究人员利用扎根理论分析访谈,将工作场所因素作为感兴趣的中心话题。迭代分析周期包括研究人员单独编码转录本,然后进行小组分析会议,直到他们达成共识。结果:34名志愿工作者参与其中,纵向访谈13人;分析了66个访谈。虽然灵性的个人重要性各不相同,但所有FPs都支持SC作为全人护理的一部分。工作场所SC促进因素/障碍包括:实践环境/患者群体;医患关系;可用资源;工作场所的要求;还有职场文化。在过去的20年里,FPs很容易识别出需要SC的患者。缺乏SC转诊资源或低估综合护理和/或医生健康的工作场所会对患者的SC提供和医生的工作满意度产生负面影响。结论:虽然FPs重视SC提供作为全人护理的一部分,但工作场所因素对医生SC提供有深远的影响。医生和工作场所价值观的不一致可能导致医生职业倦怠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信