Current Evidence on Celecoxib Safety in the Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: An Umbrella Review.

IF 14.4 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drugs Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1007/s40265-025-02234-5
Charlotte Beaudart, Christian Brabant, Majed Alokail, Jean-Yves Reginster, Olivier Bruyère
{"title":"Current Evidence on Celecoxib Safety in the Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: An Umbrella Review.","authors":"Charlotte Beaudart, Christian Brabant, Majed Alokail, Jean-Yves Reginster, Olivier Bruyère","doi":"10.1007/s40265-025-02234-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our objective was to systematically synthesize and evaluate the existing evidence from meta-syntheses (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) reporting on the safety of celecoxib in adults with chronic musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search in November 2024 across MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and Scopus databases, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines for umbrella reviews. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses involving celecoxib safety in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis were included. We assessed the risk of bias using the AMSTAR-2 tool and graded the certainty of evidence using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2294 retrieved records, 16 systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria (14 of 16 were rated as critically low quality). Celecoxib was consistently associated with a lower risk of gastroduodenal ulcers than were non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and some studies also reported fewer gastrointestinal complaints and serious events with celecoxib than with non-selective NSAIDs. Cardiovascular safety outcomes were generally similar to those with non-selective NSAIDs, although one meta-analysis showed a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality with celecoxib. Compared with placebo or non-selective NSAIDs, celecoxib did not increase the risk of renal dysfunction or elevated creatinine and may be associated with fewer renal adverse events. Evidence on all-cause mortality was limited and inconsistent, but one study suggested a lower risk than with non-selective NSAIDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Celecoxib appears to offer better gastrointestinal safety than non-selective NSAIDs. Although data on cardiovascular, renal, and mortality outcomes suggest possible advantages, the evidence remains limited and of low certainty. Moreover, some real-world evidence raises concerns in specific high-risk populations. Future research should integrate data from both randomized trials and observational studies to better inform long-term safety assessments and guide individualized treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1289-1306"},"PeriodicalIF":14.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-025-02234-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Our objective was to systematically synthesize and evaluate the existing evidence from meta-syntheses (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) reporting on the safety of celecoxib in adults with chronic musculoskeletal disorders.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in November 2024 across MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and Scopus databases, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines for umbrella reviews. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses involving celecoxib safety in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis were included. We assessed the risk of bias using the AMSTAR-2 tool and graded the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

Results: Of 2294 retrieved records, 16 systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria (14 of 16 were rated as critically low quality). Celecoxib was consistently associated with a lower risk of gastroduodenal ulcers than were non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and some studies also reported fewer gastrointestinal complaints and serious events with celecoxib than with non-selective NSAIDs. Cardiovascular safety outcomes were generally similar to those with non-selective NSAIDs, although one meta-analysis showed a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality with celecoxib. Compared with placebo or non-selective NSAIDs, celecoxib did not increase the risk of renal dysfunction or elevated creatinine and may be associated with fewer renal adverse events. Evidence on all-cause mortality was limited and inconsistent, but one study suggested a lower risk than with non-selective NSAIDs.

Conclusions: Celecoxib appears to offer better gastrointestinal safety than non-selective NSAIDs. Although data on cardiovascular, renal, and mortality outcomes suggest possible advantages, the evidence remains limited and of low certainty. Moreover, some real-world evidence raises concerns in specific high-risk populations. Future research should integrate data from both randomized trials and observational studies to better inform long-term safety assessments and guide individualized treatment decisions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

目前关于塞来昔布治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疾病安全性的证据:综述。
目的:我们的目的是系统地综合和评估来自meta- synthesis(系统综述和meta- analysis)的现有证据,这些证据报告了塞来昔布治疗成人慢性肌肉骨骼疾病的安全性。方法:我们于2024年11月在MEDLINE、Cochrane Central和Scopus数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,按照系统评价和元分析2020指南的首选报告项目进行了综合评价。仅纳入了涉及塞来昔布治疗骨关节炎、类风湿关节炎或强直性脊柱炎安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。我们使用AMSTAR-2工具评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE对证据的确定性进行分级。结果:在2294份检索记录中,16份基于随机对照试验的系统评价符合纳入标准(16份中有14份被评为极低质量)。与非选择性非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)相比,塞来昔布与胃十二指肠溃疡的风险一直较低,一些研究也报告了与非选择性非甾体抗炎药相比,塞来昔布的胃肠道疾病和严重事件较少。心血管安全结果与非选择性非甾体抗炎药相似,尽管一项荟萃分析显示塞来昔布的心血管死亡风险较低。与安慰剂或非选择性非甾体抗炎药相比,塞来昔布不会增加肾功能障碍或肌酐升高的风险,并且可能与肾脏不良事件较少相关。关于全因死亡率的证据有限且不一致,但一项研究表明,使用非选择性非甾体抗炎药的风险较低。结论:塞来昔布似乎比非选择性非甾体抗炎药具有更好的胃肠道安全性。尽管关于心血管、肾脏和死亡率结果的数据显示了可能的优势,但证据仍然有限且不确定。此外,一些真实世界的证据引起了对特定高危人群的关注。未来的研究应该整合随机试验和观察性研究的数据,以更好地为长期安全性评估提供信息,并指导个性化的治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs
Drugs 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
134
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs is a journal that aims to enhance pharmacotherapy by publishing review and original research articles on key aspects of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. The journal includes: Leading/current opinion articles providing an overview of contentious or emerging issues. Definitive reviews of drugs and drug classes, and their place in disease management. Therapy in Practice articles including recommendations for specific clinical situations. High-quality, well designed, original clinical research. Adis Drug Evaluations reviewing the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs. AdisInsight Reports summarising development at first global approval. Moreover, the journal offers additional digital features such as animated abstracts, video abstracts, instructional videos, and podcasts to increase visibility and educational value. Plain language summaries accompany articles to assist readers with some knowledge of the field in understanding important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信