Sydney Rucker, Robert J Ferdon, Gabriella Rivas, Jessica Barley, Jeffrey Korte, John Glaser, Charles Reitman, James Lawrence, Robert Ravinsky
{"title":"The Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Anterior Cervical Spine Procedures for Myelopathy: Alert Incidence, Interventions, and Prognostic Value.","authors":"Sydney Rucker, Robert J Ferdon, Gabriella Rivas, Jessica Barley, Jeffrey Korte, John Glaser, Charles Reitman, James Lawrence, Robert Ravinsky","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine the utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in anterior cervical spine procedures for myelopathy in informing intraoperative interventions.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The routine use of IONM in anterior cervical spine procedures for myelopathy remains controversial, with poorly defined indications and limited evidence validating protocols for managing intraoperative alerts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred ninety-one anterior cervical spine cases with continuous IONM from 2021 to 2025 were included, excluding revisions and nondegenerative conditions. The incidence of IONM alert was recorded for both myelopathic (n=111) and non-myelopathy (n=80) groups. Alerts were characterized by associated surgical event, intraoperative interventions, duration and resolution, and correlation with new postoperative deficit. Patient demographic and procedural variables, including total monitoring time and blood pressure fluctuations, were assessed for confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative alerts occurred in 42 patients, with a higher incidence of alert in the myelopathic group (28, 25.2%) than the non-myelopathic group (14, 17.5%) (P = 0.220). The most common event at the time of alert was instrumentation (30%) followed by decompression (27%) and patient positioning (21%). Intraoperative interventions in response to alerts included increased stimulation parameters, anesthetic adjustment, patient repositioning, or reversal of last surgical maneuver. Alerts in the myelopathic group were more likely to remain unresolved at closing [P = 0.007159; OR = 5.718, 95% CI (1.369, 29.523)] and associated with a lower positive predictive value for new postoperative deficit (0.29 vs. 0.50). Total monitoring time was the only variable significantly associated with alert incidence (P = 0.0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Myelopathic patients experienced a higher incidence of IONM alerts and were significantly more likely to have unresolved alerts at closure. However, alerts demonstrated limited predictive value for new postoperative deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective review.
Objective: Examine the utility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in anterior cervical spine procedures for myelopathy in informing intraoperative interventions.
Summary of background data: The routine use of IONM in anterior cervical spine procedures for myelopathy remains controversial, with poorly defined indications and limited evidence validating protocols for managing intraoperative alerts.
Methods: One hundred ninety-one anterior cervical spine cases with continuous IONM from 2021 to 2025 were included, excluding revisions and nondegenerative conditions. The incidence of IONM alert was recorded for both myelopathic (n=111) and non-myelopathy (n=80) groups. Alerts were characterized by associated surgical event, intraoperative interventions, duration and resolution, and correlation with new postoperative deficit. Patient demographic and procedural variables, including total monitoring time and blood pressure fluctuations, were assessed for confounding.
Results: Intraoperative alerts occurred in 42 patients, with a higher incidence of alert in the myelopathic group (28, 25.2%) than the non-myelopathic group (14, 17.5%) (P = 0.220). The most common event at the time of alert was instrumentation (30%) followed by decompression (27%) and patient positioning (21%). Intraoperative interventions in response to alerts included increased stimulation parameters, anesthetic adjustment, patient repositioning, or reversal of last surgical maneuver. Alerts in the myelopathic group were more likely to remain unresolved at closing [P = 0.007159; OR = 5.718, 95% CI (1.369, 29.523)] and associated with a lower positive predictive value for new postoperative deficit (0.29 vs. 0.50). Total monitoring time was the only variable significantly associated with alert incidence (P = 0.0004).
Conclusions: Myelopathic patients experienced a higher incidence of IONM alerts and were significantly more likely to have unresolved alerts at closure. However, alerts demonstrated limited predictive value for new postoperative deficits.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.