Reducing Conservatism in Wind Load Design: A Probabilistic Approach for Railway Bridges

ce/papers Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1002/cepa.3362
Matthias Schubert, Paul-Remo Wagner, Oliver Kübler, Poul Schroeder
{"title":"Reducing Conservatism in Wind Load Design: A Probabilistic Approach for Railway Bridges","authors":"Matthias Schubert,&nbsp;Paul-Remo Wagner,&nbsp;Oliver Kübler,&nbsp;Poul Schroeder","doi":"10.1002/cepa.3362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A railway bridge in Switzerland has been analyzed for wind-induced structural loads using long-term meteorological data. The Swiss standards and also the Eurocodes assume direction-independent wind pressures, leading to conservative design values. This study employs a directional wind load assessment, considering both longitudinal and transverse wind components. As a linear structure, the bridge is primarily affected by wind from a single dominant direction, offering substantial optimization potential. Using a Gumbel distribution for extreme value modeling, characteristic wind pressures were derived from a 43-year dataset. The results indicate a significant reduction in the transverse wind pressure (q<sub>p0,char</sub> = 0.79 kN/m<sup>2</sup>) compared to the normative approach (q<sub>p0,char</sub> = 1.3 kN/m<sup>2</sup>). Furthermore, the long-term wind data do not show an increasing trend in wind speeds over time. This refined methodology offers potential for optimizing structural design and enhancing sustainability in bridge engineering. The findings support a probabilistic approach to wind load estimation, promoting cost-effective design adaptations for existing bridges.</p>","PeriodicalId":100223,"journal":{"name":"ce/papers","volume":"8 3-4","pages":"219-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ce/papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cepa.3362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A railway bridge in Switzerland has been analyzed for wind-induced structural loads using long-term meteorological data. The Swiss standards and also the Eurocodes assume direction-independent wind pressures, leading to conservative design values. This study employs a directional wind load assessment, considering both longitudinal and transverse wind components. As a linear structure, the bridge is primarily affected by wind from a single dominant direction, offering substantial optimization potential. Using a Gumbel distribution for extreme value modeling, characteristic wind pressures were derived from a 43-year dataset. The results indicate a significant reduction in the transverse wind pressure (qp0,char = 0.79 kN/m2) compared to the normative approach (qp0,char = 1.3 kN/m2). Furthermore, the long-term wind data do not show an increasing trend in wind speeds over time. This refined methodology offers potential for optimizing structural design and enhancing sustainability in bridge engineering. The findings support a probabilistic approach to wind load estimation, promoting cost-effective design adaptations for existing bridges.

降低风荷载设计中的稳健性:铁路桥梁的一种概率方法
利用长期气象资料对瑞士一座铁路桥的风致结构荷载进行了分析。瑞士标准和欧洲规范假定风压与方向无关,导致保守的设计值。本研究采用定向风荷载评估,同时考虑了纵向和横向风分量。作为一个线性结构,桥梁主要受单一主导方向的风的影响,提供了大量的优化潜力。使用Gumbel分布进行极值建模,从43年的数据集中得到特征风压。结果表明,与规范方法(qp0,char = 1.3 kN/m2)相比,横向风压(qp0,char = 0.79 kN/m2)显著降低。此外,长期风资料没有显示风速随时间的增加趋势。这种改进的方法为优化结构设计和提高桥梁工程的可持续性提供了潜力。研究结果支持了风荷载估计的概率方法,促进了现有桥梁的成本效益设计适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信