Impact of structural solutions on the design of high-rise RC structures in long corner period seismic areas

ce/papers Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1002/cepa.3312
Dietlinde Köber
{"title":"Impact of structural solutions on the design of high-rise RC structures in long corner period seismic areas","authors":"Dietlinde Köber","doi":"10.1002/cepa.3312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One of the central struggles of engineers is to create sustainable buildings and enhance the usable area for often limited construction site dimensions. One possible and often considered solution is the design of high-rise structures. When placed in seismic areas the seismic response of high-rise structures may become difficult to control. The current study investigates the structural performance of several structural solutions for a 30 stories structure to be built for high ductility class in a seismic area with corner period of 1.8s. The main issue to be solved refers to provide enough stiffness to reduce excessive lateral displacement of structural elements and limit damage of nonstructural elements. Following structural solutions were investigated and compared: (i) central core with perimeter frames and different distributions of rigid stories; (ii) central core with perimeter frames and interior walls and (iii) central core with perimeter frames and dampers. The comparison was made in terms of lateral drift, base shear force, overturning moment and lateral stiffness variations. It turned out that the design of a regular, almost symmetric high-rise structure may face a large range of uncertainties to come up with a functional structural concept. The safety level promoted by seismic design codes rises with each code generation and structural requirements enhance. Future design of high-rise structures in long corner period seismic areas will most probably become impossible without the help of anti-seismic devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":100223,"journal":{"name":"ce/papers","volume":"8 3-4","pages":"88-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ce/papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cepa.3312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the central struggles of engineers is to create sustainable buildings and enhance the usable area for often limited construction site dimensions. One possible and often considered solution is the design of high-rise structures. When placed in seismic areas the seismic response of high-rise structures may become difficult to control. The current study investigates the structural performance of several structural solutions for a 30 stories structure to be built for high ductility class in a seismic area with corner period of 1.8s. The main issue to be solved refers to provide enough stiffness to reduce excessive lateral displacement of structural elements and limit damage of nonstructural elements. Following structural solutions were investigated and compared: (i) central core with perimeter frames and different distributions of rigid stories; (ii) central core with perimeter frames and interior walls and (iii) central core with perimeter frames and dampers. The comparison was made in terms of lateral drift, base shear force, overturning moment and lateral stiffness variations. It turned out that the design of a regular, almost symmetric high-rise structure may face a large range of uncertainties to come up with a functional structural concept. The safety level promoted by seismic design codes rises with each code generation and structural requirements enhance. Future design of high-rise structures in long corner period seismic areas will most probably become impossible without the help of anti-seismic devices.

结构方案对长角期地震区高层钢筋混凝土结构设计的影响
工程师们的核心问题之一是创造可持续建筑,并在有限的建筑场地尺寸下提高可用面积。一种可能且经常被考虑的解决方案是设计高层结构。当高层结构置于地震区时,其地震反应可能变得难以控制。本研究针对一个角期为1.8s的震区,对高延性级30层结构的几种结构方案的结构性能进行了研究。要解决的主要问题是提供足够的刚度,以减少结构单元的过度侧向位移和限制非结构单元的损伤。以下结构方案进行了研究和比较:(i)中央核心与周边框架和不同的刚性层分布;(ii)有外围框架及内墙的中心核心及(iii)有外围框架及阻尼器的中心核心。比较了横向位移、基底剪力、倾覆力矩和侧移刚度的变化。事实证明,一个规则的,几乎对称的高层结构的设计可能会面临很大范围的不确定性,以提出一个功能结构的概念。抗震设计规范所促进的安全水平随着规范的不断更新和结构要求的提高而提高。今后在长角期震区的高层结构设计,很可能离不开抗震装置的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信