An unsupervised domain adaptation method for cross-domain deceptive reviews detection

IF 3.5 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Ning Cao, Shujuan Ji, Fuzhen Zhuang, Dickson K. W. Chiu, Yajie Guo, Maoguo Gong
{"title":"An unsupervised domain adaptation method for cross-domain deceptive reviews detection","authors":"Ning Cao,&nbsp;Shujuan Ji,&nbsp;Fuzhen Zhuang,&nbsp;Dickson K. W. Chiu,&nbsp;Yajie Guo,&nbsp;Maoguo Gong","doi":"10.1007/s10489-025-06825-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deceptive reviews seriously affect the interests of consumers, honest sellers, and e-commerce platforms. As e-commerce platforms often involve multiple domains (i.e., different products or services), in-domain deceptive review detection models trained and tested on a specific dataset may not perform well on other domains. Moreover, obtaining annotated data for so many individual domains is unrealistic. Cross-domain deceptive review detection aims to leverage labeled source domain data to improve the model’s performance on unlabeled target domain data. However, existing cross-domain deceptive review detection methods require labels for target domain data or do not consider domain-specific information. To further advance research, this paper proposes an unsupervised domain adaptation method for detecting cross-domain deceptive reviews. First, we propose a multiple mask views generation method to enhance domain-specific information to obtain different mask views of reviews. Secondly, the BERT and mask attention mechanisms are used sequentially to obtain contextual representations of the mask views and the original view of reviews. Thirdly, to maintain the consistency between the mask views and the original view of reviews, we use the intra-domain Kullback-Leibler divergence to constrain their learning process. Moreover, we use inter-domain dynamic maximum mean discrepancy and conditional maximum mean discrepancy to reduce differences between the distribution of source and target domains. Three sets of experiments on two datasets show that our method is superior to the baselines. In particular, the impact of domain differences on domain adaptability is further analyzed according to the quantified metric named domain distance defined in this paper.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8041,"journal":{"name":"Applied Intelligence","volume":"55 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10489-025-06825-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deceptive reviews seriously affect the interests of consumers, honest sellers, and e-commerce platforms. As e-commerce platforms often involve multiple domains (i.e., different products or services), in-domain deceptive review detection models trained and tested on a specific dataset may not perform well on other domains. Moreover, obtaining annotated data for so many individual domains is unrealistic. Cross-domain deceptive review detection aims to leverage labeled source domain data to improve the model’s performance on unlabeled target domain data. However, existing cross-domain deceptive review detection methods require labels for target domain data or do not consider domain-specific information. To further advance research, this paper proposes an unsupervised domain adaptation method for detecting cross-domain deceptive reviews. First, we propose a multiple mask views generation method to enhance domain-specific information to obtain different mask views of reviews. Secondly, the BERT and mask attention mechanisms are used sequentially to obtain contextual representations of the mask views and the original view of reviews. Thirdly, to maintain the consistency between the mask views and the original view of reviews, we use the intra-domain Kullback-Leibler divergence to constrain their learning process. Moreover, we use inter-domain dynamic maximum mean discrepancy and conditional maximum mean discrepancy to reduce differences between the distribution of source and target domains. Three sets of experiments on two datasets show that our method is superior to the baselines. In particular, the impact of domain differences on domain adaptability is further analyzed according to the quantified metric named domain distance defined in this paper.

一种跨域欺骗性评论检测的无监督域自适应方法
虚假评论严重影响消费者、诚信卖家和电商平台的利益。由于电子商务平台通常涉及多个领域(即不同的产品或服务),在特定数据集上训练和测试的域内欺骗性评论检测模型可能在其他领域表现不佳。此外,为这么多单独的领域获得带注释的数据是不现实的。跨领域欺骗性审查检测旨在利用标记的源领域数据来提高模型在未标记的目标领域数据上的性能。然而,现有的跨领域欺骗性评论检测方法需要对目标领域数据进行标记,或者不考虑特定领域的信息。为了进一步推进研究,本文提出了一种用于检测跨领域欺骗性评论的无监督域自适应方法。首先,我们提出了一种多掩码视图生成方法来增强特定于领域的信息,以获得不同的评论掩码视图。其次,依次使用BERT和掩模注意机制来获得掩模视图和原始评论视图的上下文表示。第三,为了保持掩模视图与原始评论视图之间的一致性,我们使用域内Kullback-Leibler散度来约束它们的学习过程。此外,我们使用域间动态最大均值差异和条件最大均值差异来减小源域和目标域分布之间的差异。在两个数据集上的三组实验表明,我们的方法优于基线。特别地,根据本文定义的量化度量域距离,进一步分析了域差异对域适应性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Intelligence
Applied Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
20.80%
发文量
1361
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: With a focus on research in artificial intelligence and neural networks, this journal addresses issues involving solutions of real-life manufacturing, defense, management, government and industrial problems which are too complex to be solved through conventional approaches and require the simulation of intelligent thought processes, heuristics, applications of knowledge, and distributed and parallel processing. The integration of these multiple approaches in solving complex problems is of particular importance. The journal presents new and original research and technological developments, addressing real and complex issues applicable to difficult problems. It provides a medium for exchanging scientific research and technological achievements accomplished by the international community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信