{"title":"Deep Learning Approaches for EEG-Motor Imagery-Based BCIs: Current Models, Generalization Challenges, and Emerging Trends","authors":"Aaqib Raza;Mohd Zuki Yusoff","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3604528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study critically examines the evolution of deep learning (DL) for electroencephalogram (EEG) based motor imagery (MI) decoding with a focus on real-time Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) development. Prior studies often prioritize accuracy in isolation, neglecting computational efficiency, interpretability, noise robustness, and neurophysiological variability across subjects and tasks, while recent DL advancements have introduced novel architectures to address these issues. This work systematically evaluates those novel architectures and emerging trends through addressing 4 research questions (RQs) based on an extensive review. Initially, over 188 papers from 3 databases were retrieved with a focus on publications from 2024 to 2025. Later, through multi-stage filtering based on strict inclusion criteria, a refined corpus of 68 high-quality studies was selected. This analysis reveals that state-of-the-art models achieve competitive accuracy, varying 85-100% on public datasets, but still face challenges in computational demands, noise resilience, generalization and BCI deployment. Additionally, preprocessing and integrated hybrid feature extraction paired with explainable AI (XAI) techniques are discussed. Emerging trends such as neuromorphic computing, federated learning (FL), and closed-loop adaptive systems offering solutions to current deployment barriers have been included in the discussion. Ethical and ecological considerations, such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and energy efficiency, are notably represented in the literature. This review contributes a holistic framework for evaluating DL models, emphasizing the need to balance accuracy, efficiency, and adaptability. By synthesizing insights from large-scale datasets and explainability tools, this study exposes the limitations of current DL studies reliant on homogenous data, unavailability of codes to reproduce models and proposes strategies to mitigate neurophysiological variability. The finding underscores the urgency of prioritizing clinical relevance, ethical validation, and ecological robustness to bridge the lab to real-world divide, offering actionable directions for future research in low-power, generalizable, and user-centric BCI design.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"151866-151893"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11145817","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11145817/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study critically examines the evolution of deep learning (DL) for electroencephalogram (EEG) based motor imagery (MI) decoding with a focus on real-time Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) development. Prior studies often prioritize accuracy in isolation, neglecting computational efficiency, interpretability, noise robustness, and neurophysiological variability across subjects and tasks, while recent DL advancements have introduced novel architectures to address these issues. This work systematically evaluates those novel architectures and emerging trends through addressing 4 research questions (RQs) based on an extensive review. Initially, over 188 papers from 3 databases were retrieved with a focus on publications from 2024 to 2025. Later, through multi-stage filtering based on strict inclusion criteria, a refined corpus of 68 high-quality studies was selected. This analysis reveals that state-of-the-art models achieve competitive accuracy, varying 85-100% on public datasets, but still face challenges in computational demands, noise resilience, generalization and BCI deployment. Additionally, preprocessing and integrated hybrid feature extraction paired with explainable AI (XAI) techniques are discussed. Emerging trends such as neuromorphic computing, federated learning (FL), and closed-loop adaptive systems offering solutions to current deployment barriers have been included in the discussion. Ethical and ecological considerations, such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and energy efficiency, are notably represented in the literature. This review contributes a holistic framework for evaluating DL models, emphasizing the need to balance accuracy, efficiency, and adaptability. By synthesizing insights from large-scale datasets and explainability tools, this study exposes the limitations of current DL studies reliant on homogenous data, unavailability of codes to reproduce models and proposes strategies to mitigate neurophysiological variability. The finding underscores the urgency of prioritizing clinical relevance, ethical validation, and ecological robustness to bridge the lab to real-world divide, offering actionable directions for future research in low-power, generalizable, and user-centric BCI design.
IEEE AccessCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest.
IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on:
Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals.
Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering.
Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques.
Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.