CLEVER: A Novel Approach for Improving EV Charging Duration and Load Predictions Using Curriculum Learning Approach

IF 3.6 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Esraa Eldesouky;Ahmed Fathalla;Mahmoud Bekhit;Ahmad Salah
{"title":"CLEVER: A Novel Approach for Improving EV Charging Duration and Load Predictions Using Curriculum Learning Approach","authors":"Esraa Eldesouky;Ahmed Fathalla;Mahmoud Bekhit;Ahmad Salah","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3604342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite advancements in electric vehicle (EV) charging prediction models, existing approaches are suffering from complex charging patterns. The curriculum learning (CL) is a training approach which resembles the natural human learning progression by introducing training samples through different patterns, hence efficiently structuring the learning process. While the CL has been successfully used in other domains, its application in EV charging prediction remains unexploited. In this work, the CL is to be leveraged for the first time to improve the EV charging behavior predictions in both EV charging duration and charging load prediction. A feature-based curriculum learning approach, named CLEVER (Curriculum Learning EV chargER), is proposed for predicting charging session load and duration. CLEVER employs an advanced data stratification mechanism that introduces training samples progressively according to complexity metrics computed from temperature variations, state of charge variations, and temporal patterns. The CLEVER method integrates a CL strategy with a staged schedule mechanism over four neural network architectures: ANN, DNN, LSTM, and GRU. The performances obtained exhibit notable gains, where CL scores 20.9% reduction of Mean Absolute Error for GRU-based forecasting of EV charging duration and 2.2% improvement for DNN-based charging load forecasting. The CLEVER methodology shows considerable improvements in predicting the duration of EV charging, with, as many as 23.0% reductions in Mean Absolute Error with GRU models on Level 1 chargers and a near 20.7% improvement with DNN models on DC Fast Chargers. For EV charging load forecasts, curriculum learning produces consistent, but modest, gains, with improved up to 2.4% with ANN models on DC Fast Chargers and 1.6-2.1% improvements across different neural network architectures. This comprehensive analysis across different charger types, user groups, vehicle models, temperatures, and temporal patterns makes CL a superior approach to enhancing EV charging infrastructure management and grid stability.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"153263-153280"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11144765","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11144765/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite advancements in electric vehicle (EV) charging prediction models, existing approaches are suffering from complex charging patterns. The curriculum learning (CL) is a training approach which resembles the natural human learning progression by introducing training samples through different patterns, hence efficiently structuring the learning process. While the CL has been successfully used in other domains, its application in EV charging prediction remains unexploited. In this work, the CL is to be leveraged for the first time to improve the EV charging behavior predictions in both EV charging duration and charging load prediction. A feature-based curriculum learning approach, named CLEVER (Curriculum Learning EV chargER), is proposed for predicting charging session load and duration. CLEVER employs an advanced data stratification mechanism that introduces training samples progressively according to complexity metrics computed from temperature variations, state of charge variations, and temporal patterns. The CLEVER method integrates a CL strategy with a staged schedule mechanism over four neural network architectures: ANN, DNN, LSTM, and GRU. The performances obtained exhibit notable gains, where CL scores 20.9% reduction of Mean Absolute Error for GRU-based forecasting of EV charging duration and 2.2% improvement for DNN-based charging load forecasting. The CLEVER methodology shows considerable improvements in predicting the duration of EV charging, with, as many as 23.0% reductions in Mean Absolute Error with GRU models on Level 1 chargers and a near 20.7% improvement with DNN models on DC Fast Chargers. For EV charging load forecasts, curriculum learning produces consistent, but modest, gains, with improved up to 2.4% with ANN models on DC Fast Chargers and 1.6-2.1% improvements across different neural network architectures. This comprehensive analysis across different charger types, user groups, vehicle models, temperatures, and temporal patterns makes CL a superior approach to enhancing EV charging infrastructure management and grid stability.
CLEVER:一种利用课程学习方法提高电动汽车充电时间和负荷预测的新方法
尽管电动汽车(EV)充电预测模型取得了进步,但现有方法仍受到复杂充电模式的困扰。课程学习(CL)是一种类似于人类自然学习过程的训练方法,通过不同的模式引入训练样本,从而有效地构建学习过程。虽然CL已经成功应用于其他领域,但其在电动汽车充电预测中的应用尚未得到开发。在本研究中,首次利用CL在电动汽车充电持续时间和充电负荷预测两方面改进了电动汽车充电行为预测。提出了一种基于特征的课程学习方法smart (curriculum learning EV chargER),用于预测充电时段负荷和持续时间。CLEVER采用了一种先进的数据分层机制,根据温度变化、电荷状态变化和时间模式计算的复杂性指标,逐步引入训练样本。该方法将CL策略与分阶段调度机制集成在四个神经网络架构上:ANN、DNN、LSTM和GRU。所获得的性能表现出显著的提高,其中基于gru的电动汽车充电持续时间预测的平均绝对误差降低了20.9%,基于dnn的充电负荷预测的平均绝对误差提高了2.2%。smart方法在预测电动汽车充电持续时间方面显示出相当大的改进,在一级充电器上使用GRU模型的平均绝对误差减少了23.0%,在直流快速充电器上使用DNN模型的平均绝对误差减少了近20.7%。对于电动汽车充电负荷预测,课程学习产生了一致但适度的收益,在直流快速充电器上使用人工神经网络模型可提高2.4%,在不同的神经网络架构上可提高1.6-2.1%。这种对不同充电器类型、用户群体、车辆型号、温度和时间模式的综合分析使CL成为增强电动汽车充电基础设施管理和电网稳定性的优越方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信