The potential of quality control in structural safety: A case study on shear resistance models without shear reinforcement

ce/papers Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1002/cepa.3314
Jan Philip Schulze-Ardey, Til Lux, Tânia Feiri, Josef Hegger, Martin Claßen, Marcus Ricker
{"title":"The potential of quality control in structural safety: A case study on shear resistance models without shear reinforcement","authors":"Jan Philip Schulze-Ardey,&nbsp;Til Lux,&nbsp;Tânia Feiri,&nbsp;Josef Hegger,&nbsp;Martin Claßen,&nbsp;Marcus Ricker","doi":"10.1002/cepa.3314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Normally, quality control strategies are used to verify whether a produced structural building material complies with the specified properties. In general, quality control has a favourable effect on the outgoing distributions of material and geometric properties of incoming inspected batches. Previous studies concerning concrete compressive strength demonstrated that this effect could influence the reliability level of concrete structures. Such benefits can be quantified by using Bayesian statistics in combination with reliability-based techniques such as First or Second Order Reliability Methods (Level II methods) or simulation methods as Crude Monte Carlo or Monte Carlo methods with variance reduction (Level III methods). Presented as a case study, this paper aims to illustrate the influence of quality control on the structural safety of a steel reinforced beam verified for shear resistance without shear reinforcement according to DIN EN 1992-1-1+NA. The positive results on the structural safety of beams highlight the relevance of considering quality control information in safety assessments and their potential to unlock structural safety margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":100223,"journal":{"name":"ce/papers","volume":"8 3-4","pages":"437-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cepa.3314","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ce/papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cepa.3314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Normally, quality control strategies are used to verify whether a produced structural building material complies with the specified properties. In general, quality control has a favourable effect on the outgoing distributions of material and geometric properties of incoming inspected batches. Previous studies concerning concrete compressive strength demonstrated that this effect could influence the reliability level of concrete structures. Such benefits can be quantified by using Bayesian statistics in combination with reliability-based techniques such as First or Second Order Reliability Methods (Level II methods) or simulation methods as Crude Monte Carlo or Monte Carlo methods with variance reduction (Level III methods). Presented as a case study, this paper aims to illustrate the influence of quality control on the structural safety of a steel reinforced beam verified for shear resistance without shear reinforcement according to DIN EN 1992-1-1+NA. The positive results on the structural safety of beams highlight the relevance of considering quality control information in safety assessments and their potential to unlock structural safety margins.

结构安全质量控制的潜力:以不加剪力加固的抗剪模型为例
通常,质量控制策略用于验证生产的结构建筑材料是否符合规定的性能。一般来说,质量控制对出料分布和进料检验批次的几何特性有良好的影响。以往关于混凝土抗压强度的研究表明,这种效应会影响混凝土结构的可靠度水平。这些好处可以通过贝叶斯统计与基于可靠性的技术(如一阶或二阶可靠性方法(二级方法))或模拟方法(如粗糙蒙特卡罗方法或蒙特卡罗方法与方差缩减(三级方法))相结合来量化。作为一个案例研究,本文旨在说明质量控制对按DIN EN 1992-1-1+NA验证的无剪力加固钢配筋梁结构安全的影响。梁结构安全的积极结果突出了在安全评估中考虑质量控制信息的相关性,以及它们解锁结构安全边际的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信