{"title":"Youth Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug (ATOD) use rates in a municipal youth and family master plan","authors":"David Tataw","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to determine if community-wide activities in the Pomona Youth and Family Master Plan (PYFMP) might have influenced youth ATOD use changes in Pomona and in comparison to the US national jurisdiction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An integrated framework encompassing social cognitive theory and the risk and protective factors approach guided the study using a pre-post quasi-experimental design and z-test analysis. Same-group and independent group comparisons within and across school grades, intervention years, and jurisdictions were conducted in a quasi-experimental design. The baseline (2005–06) and follow-up (2009–10) samples were as follows: Pomona sample was 3967(2005–06) and 2693(2009–10); and for the US, the samples were 122,243(2005–06) and 101,141(2009–10). Contemporary and context-sensitive evaluation paradigms shape the study's design, plan of analysis, and results interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Within the five years under study, overall youth ATOD use trends in Pomona, particularly in comparison with US trends, showed a slow, but clear and positive shift.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>Though PYFMP interventions might have positively impacted ATOD use among Pomona Youth, the pace of change was slow. Future studies should examine the following factors not investigated in this study: specific community-level factors that might have influenced individual youth ATOD use; the effect of underlying socioeconomic and resource factors on youth ATOD use; and the role of micro-level factors and interventions. Some evaluation lessons learned include involving evaluators in planning, being flexible with plans of analysis, and considering context when interpreting results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102693"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective
The purpose of this study was to determine if community-wide activities in the Pomona Youth and Family Master Plan (PYFMP) might have influenced youth ATOD use changes in Pomona and in comparison to the US national jurisdiction.
Methods
An integrated framework encompassing social cognitive theory and the risk and protective factors approach guided the study using a pre-post quasi-experimental design and z-test analysis. Same-group and independent group comparisons within and across school grades, intervention years, and jurisdictions were conducted in a quasi-experimental design. The baseline (2005–06) and follow-up (2009–10) samples were as follows: Pomona sample was 3967(2005–06) and 2693(2009–10); and for the US, the samples were 122,243(2005–06) and 101,141(2009–10). Contemporary and context-sensitive evaluation paradigms shape the study's design, plan of analysis, and results interpretation.
Results
Within the five years under study, overall youth ATOD use trends in Pomona, particularly in comparison with US trends, showed a slow, but clear and positive shift.
Discussion and conclusion
Though PYFMP interventions might have positively impacted ATOD use among Pomona Youth, the pace of change was slow. Future studies should examine the following factors not investigated in this study: specific community-level factors that might have influenced individual youth ATOD use; the effect of underlying socioeconomic and resource factors on youth ATOD use; and the role of micro-level factors and interventions. Some evaluation lessons learned include involving evaluators in planning, being flexible with plans of analysis, and considering context when interpreting results.
期刊介绍:
Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.