FELACS: Federated learning with adaptive client selection for IoT DDoS attack detection

IF 5.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Mulualem Bitew Anley, Pasquale Coscia, Angelo Genovese, Vincenzo Piuri
{"title":"FELACS: Federated learning with adaptive client selection for IoT DDoS attack detection","authors":"Mulualem Bitew Anley,&nbsp;Pasquale Coscia,&nbsp;Angelo Genovese,&nbsp;Vincenzo Piuri","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2025.104642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks pose a significant threat to network security by overwhelming systems with malicious traffic, leading to service disruptions and potential data breaches. The traditional centralized machine learning (ML) methods for detecting DDoS attacks in Internet of Things (IoT) environments raise privacy and security concerns due to their collection and distribution of data to a central entity that may not be trusted to perform model training. Federated learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving solution that enables distributed collaboration by training a model only on local clients, without data exchanges, where the central entity only performs global model aggregation. However, the current practice of random client selection, combined with the statistical heterogeneity of client data and the device heterogeneity encountered in IoT environments, requires many training rounds to reach optimal accuracy, increasing the imposed computational overhead. To address these challenges, we propose a multiobjective optimization-based FL with adaptive client selection (FELACS) approach that maximizes client importance scores while satisfying resource, performance, and data diversity constraints. Experiments are carried out on the CIC-IDS2018, CIC-DDoS2019, BoT-IoT, and CIC-IoT2023 datasets, demonstrating that FELACS improves upon the accuracy of the existing approaches while exhibiting increased convergence speed when training a model in an FL scenario, hence reducing the number of communication rounds required to achieve the target accuracy, making it highly effective for performing IoT-based DDoS attack detection in FL scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51004,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Security","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 104642"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404825003311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks pose a significant threat to network security by overwhelming systems with malicious traffic, leading to service disruptions and potential data breaches. The traditional centralized machine learning (ML) methods for detecting DDoS attacks in Internet of Things (IoT) environments raise privacy and security concerns due to their collection and distribution of data to a central entity that may not be trusted to perform model training. Federated learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving solution that enables distributed collaboration by training a model only on local clients, without data exchanges, where the central entity only performs global model aggregation. However, the current practice of random client selection, combined with the statistical heterogeneity of client data and the device heterogeneity encountered in IoT environments, requires many training rounds to reach optimal accuracy, increasing the imposed computational overhead. To address these challenges, we propose a multiobjective optimization-based FL with adaptive client selection (FELACS) approach that maximizes client importance scores while satisfying resource, performance, and data diversity constraints. Experiments are carried out on the CIC-IDS2018, CIC-DDoS2019, BoT-IoT, and CIC-IoT2023 datasets, demonstrating that FELACS improves upon the accuracy of the existing approaches while exhibiting increased convergence speed when training a model in an FL scenario, hence reducing the number of communication rounds required to achieve the target accuracy, making it highly effective for performing IoT-based DDoS attack detection in FL scenarios.
FELACS:用于物联网DDoS攻击检测的具有自适应客户端选择的联邦学习
分布式拒绝服务(DDoS)攻击通过恶意流量淹没系统,导致服务中断和潜在的数据泄露,对网络安全构成重大威胁。用于检测物联网(IoT)环境中DDoS攻击的传统集中式机器学习(ML)方法引起了隐私和安全问题,因为它们将数据收集和分发给可能不受信任的中央实体来执行模型训练。联邦学习(FL)提供了一种保护隐私的解决方案,它通过仅在本地客户机上训练模型而不进行数据交换来实现分布式协作,其中中心实体仅执行全局模型聚合。然而,目前随机客户端选择的做法,再加上客户端数据的统计异质性和物联网环境中遇到的设备异质性,需要多次训练才能达到最佳精度,从而增加了计算开销。为了应对这些挑战,我们提出了一种基于多目标优化的自适应客户选择(FELACS)方法,该方法在满足资源、性能和数据多样性约束的同时最大化客户重要性得分。在CIC-IDS2018、CIC-DDoS2019、BoT-IoT和CIC-IoT2023数据集上进行的实验表明,FELACS提高了现有方法的准确性,同时在FL场景下训练模型时表现出更快的收敛速度,从而减少了实现目标精度所需的通信轮数,使其在FL场景下执行基于物联网的DDoS攻击检测非常有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Security
Computers & Security 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
365
审稿时长
10.7 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Security is the most respected technical journal in the IT security field. With its high-profile editorial board and informative regular features and columns, the journal is essential reading for IT security professionals around the world. Computers & Security provides you with a unique blend of leading edge research and sound practical management advice. It is aimed at the professional involved with computer security, audit, control and data integrity in all sectors - industry, commerce and academia. Recognized worldwide as THE primary source of reference for applied research and technical expertise it is your first step to fully secure systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信