Safety and justice conflicts in the age of connected and automated vehicles: perceptions of pedestrians and car drivers

IF 4.4 2区工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2025.103355

Laura Martínez-Buelvas , Andry Rakotonirainy , Deanna Grant-Smith , Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios

{"title":"Safety and justice conflicts in the age of connected and automated vehicles: perceptions of pedestrians and car drivers","authors":"Laura Martínez-Buelvas , Andry Rakotonirainy , Deanna Grant-Smith , Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.103355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) are an emerging technology expected to improve safety, efficiency, and accessibility outcomes for all road users. However, comprehensive and multi-group analyses of the technology still need to be undertaken by the government, car manufacturers, and researchers, particularly around social aspects such as justice and safety value disparities. This study explores car drivers’ and pedestrians’ perceptions of safety and justice in the current transport system and how the deployment of CAVs might disrupt them. Interviews were conducted with 30 participants in Australia, a car-dependent country. The participants were 18 car drivers and 12 pedestrians aged between 18 and 79. Participants predominantly identified as either pedestrians or car drivers, though some occasionally used the other mode. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, organised, and analysed using a reflexive thematic analysis. Three main themes were identified: (1) independence, (2) the transport system as a safety problem, and (3) the transport system as a justice problem. The analysis indicated that most participants preferred their current mode of transport due to perceived benefits and enjoyment. Car drivers often highlighted flexibility and independence, while pedestrians valued walkability and convenience. However, both groups expressed concerns about safety and justice in the current transport system, particularly regarding limited accessibility for people with disabilities and inadequate public transport. Finally, while both participants broadly supported the introduction of CAVs, many, especially pedestrians, expressed concerns about their potential to exacerbate existing disadvantages for vulnerable road users. This research finds that greater emphasis should be placed on increasing research on and planning for the impact of CAVs to ensure vulnerable groups’ concerns are addressed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103355"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825003109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) are an emerging technology expected to improve safety, efficiency, and accessibility outcomes for all road users. However, comprehensive and multi-group analyses of the technology still need to be undertaken by the government, car manufacturers, and researchers, particularly around social aspects such as justice and safety value disparities. This study explores car drivers’ and pedestrians’ perceptions of safety and justice in the current transport system and how the deployment of CAVs might disrupt them. Interviews were conducted with 30 participants in Australia, a car-dependent country. The participants were 18 car drivers and 12 pedestrians aged between 18 and 79. Participants predominantly identified as either pedestrians or car drivers, though some occasionally used the other mode. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, organised, and analysed using a reflexive thematic analysis. Three main themes were identified: (1) independence, (2) the transport system as a safety problem, and (3) the transport system as a justice problem. The analysis indicated that most participants preferred their current mode of transport due to perceived benefits and enjoyment. Car drivers often highlighted flexibility and independence, while pedestrians valued walkability and convenience. However, both groups expressed concerns about safety and justice in the current transport system, particularly regarding limited accessibility for people with disabilities and inadequate public transport. Finally, while both participants broadly supported the introduction of CAVs, many, especially pedestrians, expressed concerns about their potential to exacerbate existing disadvantages for vulnerable road users. This research finds that greater emphasis should be placed on increasing research on and planning for the impact of CAVs to ensure vulnerable groups’ concerns are addressed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

互联和自动驾驶汽车时代的安全和正义冲突：行人和汽车司机的看法

联网和自动驾驶汽车（cav）是一项新兴技术，有望提高所有道路使用者的安全性、效率和可达性。然而，政府、汽车制造商和研究人员仍然需要对这项技术进行全面和多群体的分析，特别是在司法和安全价值差异等社会方面。本研究探讨了当前交通系统中汽车司机和行人对安全和正义的看法，以及自动驾驶汽车的部署可能会如何破坏它们。在澳大利亚这个依赖汽车的国家，对30名参与者进行了采访。参与者是18名汽车司机和12名行人，年龄在18岁至79岁之间。参与者主要被认为是行人或汽车司机，尽管偶尔也有人使用另一种模式。访谈记录、转录、组织，并使用反身性主题分析进行分析。确定了三个主要主题：(1)独立性，(2)运输系统是一个安全问题，(3)运输系统是一个正义问题。分析显示，大多数参与者更喜欢他们目前的交通方式，因为他们认为这是一种好处和享受。汽车司机通常强调灵活性和独立性，而行人则看重步行性和便利性。然而，这两个团体都对目前运输系统的安全和公正表示关切，特别是残疾人的无障碍设施有限和公共交通设施不足。最后，虽然两位与会者都广泛支持引入自动驾驶汽车，但许多人，特别是行人，担心自动驾驶汽车可能会加剧弱势道路使用者的现有不利条件。本研究发现，应更加重视增加对cav影响的研究和规划，以确保弱势群体的关注得到解决。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Multiple-

CiteScore

7.60

自引率

14.60%

发文量

239

审稿时长

71 days

期刊介绍： Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.