Thresholds for minimum clinically important difference, minimal important change and patient acceptable symptom state for the ACL-RSI and the K-SES in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Ramana Piussi, Jakob Lindskog, Rebecca Hamrin Senorski, Roland Thomeé, Kristian Samuelsson, Eric Hamrin Senorski
{"title":"Thresholds for minimum clinically important difference, minimal important change and patient acceptable symptom state for the ACL-RSI and the K-SES in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.","authors":"Ramana Piussi, Jakob Lindskog, Rebecca Hamrin Senorski, Roland Thomeé, Kristian Samuelsson, Eric Hamrin Senorski","doi":"10.1002/ksa.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to calculate and provide Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds, Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID), and Minimal Important Change (MIC) values for the ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale and the Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (K-SES) in patients treated with ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were extracted from a rehabilitation specific registry, Project ACL. The registry prospectively collects patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PASS, MCID and MIC were calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and anchor-based methods. Calculations were made for patients who completed the ACL-RSI and K-SES<sub>18</sub> at follow-up points 4 (K-SES<sub>18</sub> only), 8, 12 and 18 months post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 704 patients aged 15-50 year, who underwent ACL reconstruction were included. The PASS thresholds increased over time, with AUC values indicating acceptable discrimination at all follow-ups, especially at 18 months. The MCID values ranged from 1.6-4.1 for the K-SES<sub>18</sub> and 13.6-30.4 for the ACL-RSI. The MIC values varied between follow-ups, with negative or near-zero values observed at certain intervals, particularly for K-SES<sub>18</sub> future.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PASS, MCID and MIC values for the K-SES<sub>18</sub> and the ACL-RSI vary over time. Practical thresholds are provided for clinicians to better interpret scores and to determine if meaningful improvements have been achieved.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to calculate and provide Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds, Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID), and Minimal Important Change (MIC) values for the ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale and the Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (K-SES) in patients treated with ACL reconstruction.
Method: Data were extracted from a rehabilitation specific registry, Project ACL. The registry prospectively collects patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PASS, MCID and MIC were calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and anchor-based methods. Calculations were made for patients who completed the ACL-RSI and K-SES18 at follow-up points 4 (K-SES18 only), 8, 12 and 18 months post-surgery.
Results: A total of 704 patients aged 15-50 year, who underwent ACL reconstruction were included. The PASS thresholds increased over time, with AUC values indicating acceptable discrimination at all follow-ups, especially at 18 months. The MCID values ranged from 1.6-4.1 for the K-SES18 and 13.6-30.4 for the ACL-RSI. The MIC values varied between follow-ups, with negative or near-zero values observed at certain intervals, particularly for K-SES18 future.
Conclusion: The PASS, MCID and MIC values for the K-SES18 and the ACL-RSI vary over time. Practical thresholds are provided for clinicians to better interpret scores and to determine if meaningful improvements have been achieved.