PolyCheck: A hybrid model for predicting polypharmacy-induced adverse drug reactions in tuberculosis treatment using heterogenous drug-target-ADR networks
Ahmad Tamim Ghafari , Yuslina Zakaria , Mizaton Hazizul Hasan , Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed , Qand Agha Nazari
{"title":"PolyCheck: A hybrid model for predicting polypharmacy-induced adverse drug reactions in tuberculosis treatment using heterogenous drug-target-ADR networks","authors":"Ahmad Tamim Ghafari , Yuslina Zakaria , Mizaton Hazizul Hasan , Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed , Qand Agha Nazari","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2025.108393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Polypharmacy during tuberculosis (TB) treatment, particularly in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM), significantly increases the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to complex drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Existing computational methods primarily focus on pairwise drug interactions, often failing to capture the multifactorial nature of ADRs in polypharmacy contexts. To address this gap, we developed PolyCheck, a hybrid predictive model that integrates network-based and rule-based methods to identify potential ADRs arising from multi-drug regimens. We constructed a heterogeneous Drug–Target–ADR interaction network comprising first-line anti-TB and antidiabetic drugs, their targets, and associated ADRs. The Random Walk with Restart (RWR) algorithm was employed to rank ADR nodes, and a rule-based layer further refined predictions by incorporating the biological relevance of Drug–Target–ADR associations. Evaluation using cross-validation and case-based testing demonstrated strong predictive performance, with accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUPRC values of 0.70, 0.74, 0.92, 0.81, and 0.74, respectively. PolyCheck offers a scalable and interpretable approach for predicting ADRs in complex treatment regimens and can support safer, individualized TB therapy in patients with comorbid conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 108393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871925008135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Polypharmacy during tuberculosis (TB) treatment, particularly in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM), significantly increases the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to complex drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Existing computational methods primarily focus on pairwise drug interactions, often failing to capture the multifactorial nature of ADRs in polypharmacy contexts. To address this gap, we developed PolyCheck, a hybrid predictive model that integrates network-based and rule-based methods to identify potential ADRs arising from multi-drug regimens. We constructed a heterogeneous Drug–Target–ADR interaction network comprising first-line anti-TB and antidiabetic drugs, their targets, and associated ADRs. The Random Walk with Restart (RWR) algorithm was employed to rank ADR nodes, and a rule-based layer further refined predictions by incorporating the biological relevance of Drug–Target–ADR associations. Evaluation using cross-validation and case-based testing demonstrated strong predictive performance, with accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUPRC values of 0.70, 0.74, 0.92, 0.81, and 0.74, respectively. PolyCheck offers a scalable and interpretable approach for predicting ADRs in complex treatment regimens and can support safer, individualized TB therapy in patients with comorbid conditions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.