PolyCheck: A hybrid model for predicting polypharmacy-induced adverse drug reactions in tuberculosis treatment using heterogenous drug-target-ADR networks

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ahmad Tamim Ghafari , Yuslina Zakaria , Mizaton Hazizul Hasan , Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed , Qand Agha Nazari
{"title":"PolyCheck: A hybrid model for predicting polypharmacy-induced adverse drug reactions in tuberculosis treatment using heterogenous drug-target-ADR networks","authors":"Ahmad Tamim Ghafari ,&nbsp;Yuslina Zakaria ,&nbsp;Mizaton Hazizul Hasan ,&nbsp;Abu Bakar Abdul Majeed ,&nbsp;Qand Agha Nazari","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2025.108393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Polypharmacy during tuberculosis (TB) treatment, particularly in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM), significantly increases the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to complex drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Existing computational methods primarily focus on pairwise drug interactions, often failing to capture the multifactorial nature of ADRs in polypharmacy contexts. To address this gap, we developed PolyCheck, a hybrid predictive model that integrates network-based and rule-based methods to identify potential ADRs arising from multi-drug regimens. We constructed a heterogeneous Drug–Target–ADR interaction network comprising first-line anti-TB and antidiabetic drugs, their targets, and associated ADRs. The Random Walk with Restart (RWR) algorithm was employed to rank ADR nodes, and a rule-based layer further refined predictions by incorporating the biological relevance of Drug–Target–ADR associations. Evaluation using cross-validation and case-based testing demonstrated strong predictive performance, with accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUPRC values of 0.70, 0.74, 0.92, 0.81, and 0.74, respectively. PolyCheck offers a scalable and interpretable approach for predicting ADRs in complex treatment regimens and can support safer, individualized TB therapy in patients with comorbid conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 108393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871925008135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polypharmacy during tuberculosis (TB) treatment, particularly in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM), significantly increases the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to complex drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Existing computational methods primarily focus on pairwise drug interactions, often failing to capture the multifactorial nature of ADRs in polypharmacy contexts. To address this gap, we developed PolyCheck, a hybrid predictive model that integrates network-based and rule-based methods to identify potential ADRs arising from multi-drug regimens. We constructed a heterogeneous Drug–Target–ADR interaction network comprising first-line anti-TB and antidiabetic drugs, their targets, and associated ADRs. The Random Walk with Restart (RWR) algorithm was employed to rank ADR nodes, and a rule-based layer further refined predictions by incorporating the biological relevance of Drug–Target–ADR associations. Evaluation using cross-validation and case-based testing demonstrated strong predictive performance, with accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUPRC values of 0.70, 0.74, 0.92, 0.81, and 0.74, respectively. PolyCheck offers a scalable and interpretable approach for predicting ADRs in complex treatment regimens and can support safer, individualized TB therapy in patients with comorbid conditions.
PolyCheck:一个混合模型,用于预测结核治疗中使用异质药物-靶点-不良反应网络的多种药物引起的药物不良反应。
在结核病(TB)治疗期间,特别是在患有糖尿病(DM)等合并症的患者中,由于复杂的药物相互作用(ddi),多种药物治疗显著增加了药物不良反应(adr)的风险。现有的计算方法主要集中在药物的成对相互作用上,往往无法捕捉到多药环境下adr的多因素性质。为了解决这一差距,我们开发了PolyCheck,这是一种混合预测模型,集成了基于网络和基于规则的方法,以识别多种药物方案引起的潜在不良反应。我们构建了一个异质性的药物-靶点- adr相互作用网络,包括一线抗结核和抗糖尿病药物、它们的靶点和相关的adr。采用随机行走与重启(RWR)算法对ADR节点进行排序,并通过纳入药物-靶点-ADR关联的生物学相关性,基于规则的层进一步改进了预测。交叉验证和基于案例的检验显示了较强的预测性能,准确率、精密度、召回率、f1评分和AUPRC值分别为0.70、0.74、0.92、0.81和0.74。PolyCheck为预测复杂治疗方案中的不良反应提供了一种可扩展和可解释的方法,并可支持对合并症患者进行更安全、个性化的结核病治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信