Facilitating fitness for wheelchair users: exploring safety and usability of a standing active arm passive leg exercise device.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Katherine Toy, Rae Lee, Johanne Mattie, James J Laskin, W Ben Mortenson, Jaimie Borisoff
{"title":"Facilitating fitness for wheelchair users: exploring safety and usability of a standing active arm passive leg exercise device.","authors":"Katherine Toy, Rae Lee, Johanne Mattie, James J Laskin, W Ben Mortenson, Jaimie Borisoff","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2552407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exercising upright can promote rehabilitation and reduce the risk of cardiorespiratory and musculoskeletal complications from prolonged sitting. Seated Active Arm Passive Leg Exercise (AAPLE) offers cardiovascular benefits; however, no commercially available device currently enables fully supported, upright AAPLE. The AAPLEwalk device transitions wheelchair users from sitting to standing, facilitating gait-like movements at varying intensities. An iterative development process incorporating user feedback refined the design from version 1 (v1) to version 2 (v2), which had yet to be formally evaluated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>(1) To assess the perceptions of non-disabled users and wheelchair users regarding the safety, usability, and functionality of AAPLEwalk<sup>™</sup> v2. (2) To compare user experiences between v1 and v2 among a sub-sample who tested both.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants were fitted to the AAPLEwalk. Before wheelchair users, non-disabled users initially tested the device to ensure skin and pressure safety. We explored comfort, usability, and design modifications through informal discussions, formal semi-structured interviews, and measured System Usability Scale (SUS) scores. RESULTS<b>:</b> Fourteen non-disabled and six wheelchair users participated. Respectively, average SUS scores were 70 (non-disabled) and 72 (wheelchair), ranking in the 50th and 80th percentiles. Three themes emerged: (1) A good workout, (2) Feeling secure, (3) Maximizing independence. Users reported physical, mental, and emotional benefits, finding AAPLEwalk v2 safe, comfortable, and feasible for independent use with practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AAPLEwalk appears to be a promising device for enabling upright APPLE for wheelchair users. Future research should assess the device's physiological impact and long-term fitness benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2552407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Exercising upright can promote rehabilitation and reduce the risk of cardiorespiratory and musculoskeletal complications from prolonged sitting. Seated Active Arm Passive Leg Exercise (AAPLE) offers cardiovascular benefits; however, no commercially available device currently enables fully supported, upright AAPLE. The AAPLEwalk device transitions wheelchair users from sitting to standing, facilitating gait-like movements at varying intensities. An iterative development process incorporating user feedback refined the design from version 1 (v1) to version 2 (v2), which had yet to be formally evaluated.

Purpose: (1) To assess the perceptions of non-disabled users and wheelchair users regarding the safety, usability, and functionality of AAPLEwalk v2. (2) To compare user experiences between v1 and v2 among a sub-sample who tested both.

Materials and methods: Participants were fitted to the AAPLEwalk. Before wheelchair users, non-disabled users initially tested the device to ensure skin and pressure safety. We explored comfort, usability, and design modifications through informal discussions, formal semi-structured interviews, and measured System Usability Scale (SUS) scores. RESULTS: Fourteen non-disabled and six wheelchair users participated. Respectively, average SUS scores were 70 (non-disabled) and 72 (wheelchair), ranking in the 50th and 80th percentiles. Three themes emerged: (1) A good workout, (2) Feeling secure, (3) Maximizing independence. Users reported physical, mental, and emotional benefits, finding AAPLEwalk v2 safe, comfortable, and feasible for independent use with practice.

Conclusion: The AAPLEwalk appears to be a promising device for enabling upright APPLE for wheelchair users. Future research should assess the device's physiological impact and long-term fitness benefits.

促进轮椅使用者的健康:探索一种站立式主动手臂被动腿部运动装置的安全性和可用性。
简介:直立运动可以促进康复,减少长时间坐着引起的心肺和肌肉骨骼并发症的风险。坐式主动臂被动腿部运动(aple)对心血管有益;然而,目前还没有商用设备能够完全支持直立式AAPLE。aplewalk设备将轮椅使用者从坐到站,促进不同强度的步态运动。结合用户反馈的迭代开发过程将设计从版本1 (v1)细化到版本2 (v2),这还需要正式评估。目的:(1)评估非残疾用户和轮椅用户对AAPLEwalk™v2的安全性、可用性和功能的看法。(2)在测试了两者的子样本中比较v1和v2之间的用户体验。材料和方法:参与者适合aplewalk。在使用轮椅之前,非残疾用户首先测试了该设备,以确保皮肤和压力的安全。我们通过非正式讨论、正式的半结构化访谈和测量系统可用性量表(SUS)分数来探索舒适度、可用性和设计修改。结果:14名非残疾人和6名轮椅使用者参与。平均SUS得分分别为70分(非残疾人)和72分(轮椅),分别位于第50和第80百分位。出现了三个主题:(1)良好的锻炼;(2)安全感;(3)最大限度地提高独立性。用户报告了身体、精神和情感上的好处,发现AAPLEwalk v2安全、舒适,并且可以独立使用。结论:aplewalk似乎是一种很有前途的设备,可以为轮椅使用者提供直立的APPLE。未来的研究应该评估该设备的生理影响和长期健身益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信